- Jul 17, 2017
- 265
- 770
Whats wrong with that?Exactly what I was thinking, just auctioning off the decision to the highest bidder.
Whats wrong with that?Exactly what I was thinking, just auctioning off the decision to the highest bidder.
Instead of having a clear and consistent vision, it will just be a disjointed mess determined by whoever gives them the most money. If they want to do something like that just make animations on rule34 or something.Whats wrong with that?
Dev, the first minigame is idiotic af. Ignoring how annoying the "spam random keys" design for a minigame is, you made it so a person playing has to turn on caps lock BECAUSE ONLY CAPITALIZED LETTERS COUNT. That is beyond fucking stupid.
If you want a reason for not doing bullshit like this, beyond just people like myself being pissed off, consider this:
Games have quit moments (Stuff such as story elements or game features features that annoy a player into quitting the game.). Your goal as a dev is (with some exceptions ofcourse) to reduce those to a minimum. Please do.
Ffs why do I see people bitching about the minigames? It's not even hard, don't take a long time, YOU CAN DISABLE THEM IF YOU USED LIKE 1% OF YOUR BRAIN (and no, you don't have to use caps lock for it) YOU are beyond stupid if you can't deal with them. Thank you for coming to my ted talk.Dev, the first minigame is idiotic af. Ignoring how annoying the "spam random keys" design for a minigame is, you made it so a person playing has to turn on caps lock BECAUSE ONLY CAPITALIZED LETTERS COUNT. That is beyond fucking stupid.
If you want a reason for not doing bullshit like this, beyond just people like myself being pissed off, consider this:
Games have quit moments (Stuff such as story elements or game features features that annoy a player into quitting the game.). Your goal as a dev is (with some exceptions ofcourse) to reduce those to a minimum. Please do.
Instead of having a clear and consistent vision, it will just be a disjointed mess determined by whoever gives them the most money. If they want to do something like that just make animations on rule34 or something.
People want to know what the dev has planned so they can decide whether to support them or not. Everyone in my signature were upfront in the very beginning about what will and won't be in their avn and have stayed true to that so far.
Any specific kinks = anything I get a boatload of money to add. Seriously, are they incapable of giving a straight answer?
I don't had the impression you need one.Walkthrough?>??
There will be Harem and fetishes will be optional. Not that hard to understandAny specific kinks = anything I get a boatload of money to add. Seriously, are they incapable of giving a straight answer?
The fact that they won't say tells they either don't know and are making it up as they go along or don't want to alienate potential supporters. This shit is why people get pissed when these fucking devs add shit that people didn't sign up for in the beginning. They don't need to hide it like its classified information.There will be Harem and fetishes will be optional. Not that hard to understand