Nope that's only the total current content, all the numbers together, not the progress tracker, all are progress trackers. I personally would take the 'art' as most realistic progress.The figure is for "Total content".
Do you know what the Progress Tracker is?
The one on the game'sYou must be registered to see the linksshows 58.4%:
View attachment 2667824
But, apparently, the one on their Discord has been updated more recently & shows 62%.
I'm having trouble with some of your maths. 0.6 released on the 30th of July last year with work on the current 0.7 version starting right after that. So your September value is a little off.Can you even count??
Thread was last updated September 3rd, 2022.
It's now June 1st, 2023. That's 2 days short of 9 months.
Not 10.
I'm astounded. How are you allowed on the internet unsupervised?
It's taken 9 months to reach 62%.
It's not rocket science to work out that 1/3 of that is 3 months per 20% x 2 (for the 38% remaining) gives 6 months.
Divide by 3, multiply by 2. Simple, very basic mathematics, which you failed at. Well done.
As they are both working & not in hospital, also as their new child is more likely to have settled into a routine, it stands to reason that the remaining 38% will go quicker, anyway.
Again, it's not rocket science.
It's funny, but don't take it too serious, de 58% is just alle the items counted together, not counting that some stuff takes longer, like arts works. And that the numbers constantly increase on both sides.I'm having trouble with some of your maths. 0.6 released on the 30th of July last year with work on the current 0.7 version starting right after that. So your September value is a little off.
Also the progress tracker on their website and patreon page has the total progress at 58% not 62%.
A minor difference but when your giving out to people about their poor maths you should really have your figures in order as well.
If they get the release out before November that'd be brilliant but personally I think it's going to take longer.
There is nothing wrong with my maths. You seem to be having trouble, full stop.I'm having trouble with some of your maths. 0.6 released on the 30th of July last year with work on the current 0.7 version starting right after that. So your September value is a little off.
Also the progress tracker on their website and patreon page has the total progress at 58% not 62%.
A minor difference but when your giving out to people about their poor maths you should really have your figures in order as well.
If they get the release out before November that'd be brilliant but personally I think it's going to take longer.
& the figure of 62%, where I clearly stated the Progress Tracker on their website was a little behind the one on their Discord.Thread was last updated September 3rd, 2022.
It's now June 1st, 2023. That's 2 days short of 9 months.
Reading helps.The one on the game'sYou must be registered to see the linksshows 58.4%
But, apparently, the one on their Discord has been updated more recently & shows 62%.
Your being very aggressive just because I pointed out a couple of discrepancies with how you made your prediction.There is nothing wrong with my maths. You seem to be having trouble, full stop.
You're disputing the date I gave, which I clearly stated I took from the OP's last update
& the figure of 62%, where I clearly stated the Progress Tracker on their website was a little behind the one on their Discord.
Reading helps.
As you can see from moskyx's post, directly below yours, it is 62%, precisely as I said.
My mathematics was perfectly sound, for the date I gave.
The date I gave was when 0.6.02, the latest update, was uploaded here.
It was officially released towards the end of August. You're quibbling over a few days.
The date you've provided is for 0.6. This is not the latest update. There have obviously been 2 subsequent updates, since then.
There was circa 2 months, after the date you gave, spent working on fixes.
Still, even if the date is a couple of days off, that doesn't make the maths wrong.
It's still Content % completed \ No. of months, to give average content completed per month, so far.
Then % remaining \ average % per month, to give an estimate of time remaining.
e.g. 80% completed has taken 8 months. 80 \ 8 = 10% per month, average.
20% remaining \ 10% per month on average = roughly 2 months remaining.
You're behaving like a child with all the immature name calling. I was wrong about the % on the tracker but you seem unwilling to admit any of your own mistakes.Yes. Because you didn't read, before running your ignorant mouth & making false accusations.
You claimed my maths was wrong. It was not.
You used the incorrect version, therefore the incorrect date. Not me, as you accused.
You got the % wrong. Not me, as you accused.
That categorically makes you a hypocrite.
btw - I think you mean "You're" (you are), not "Your" (possessive). If you don't even know which words you're using, there's not much hope here.
Yes, all predictions do need to be taken as moveable. That's why I clearly described it as a "rough estimate".
Again, read before running your mouth.
The method I described is the only way to get close to anything resembling accuracy.
Even the Progress Tracker is not totally reliable. The debug number will obviously increase, as more bugs are found.
Did you miss (not read, again) the part where they've had a new child & one of them (Chestnut) was also separately hospitalised, during that period?
Do you not think it stands to reason, given that both of them are now working on it & are likely to have their new child settled into something close to a routine, that the remaining 38% will actually go more quickly?
Their workforce being doubled obviously increases output productivity.
My mistake was thinking their progress tracker was up to date (normally they're very good for keeping this updated, I'm surprised it was wrong).There is nothing immature about pointing out your obvious lack of reading & comprehension (ignorance), or your blatant hypocrisy.
The three things you accused me of getting wrong, you were wrong about. Not me.
My maths was absolutely fine.
My date was a few days off from release date, but exactly correct for what I stated it as. Yours was 2 months off.
You even used the wrong version, 2 versions back, to calculate your date.
The % I stated was absolutely correct. Yours was not.
That makes your accusations the literal definition of hypocrisy.
You also claimed that they began work on 0.7 immediately after finishing 0.6.
As they subsequently released 0.6.01 & .02, over the following 2 months, this was obviously not correct, either.
What is my mistake? Other than discussing this with someone such as you.
Please do point it out.
Wow you really can't admit your even the slightest bit wrong. It was in their post on August 13th. "Chestnut and I are done with our break, have already started work on the 0.7 update".No. You made 3 mistakes:
1. You called my maths wrong, when it was absolutely correct.
2. You gave the date as being the release date of 0.6, yet they obviously developed and released 0.6.01 & .02 in the 2 months following that.
Which is why I gave the date following the release of 0.6.02, because that's when they could begin work on 0.7 in earnest.
I clearly stated the date as being when the "Thread Last Updated" & it is. Absolutely correct.
You claimed that work on 0.7 began on 30th July.
Now, in the dev post you've just provided, it's 13th August, 2 weeks after your date & they've just done 1st day of work on planning.
Do you like proving yourself wrong?
3. Then the Tracker, which I'd already pointed out the information you needed to get it right, yet you got it wrong & had the audacity to accuse me of doing so.
Well done.
Learn to spell FFS. Again, it's "you're", not "your".Wow you really can't admit your even the slightest bit wrong. It was in their post on August 13th. "Chestnut and I are done with our break, have already started work on the 0.7 update".
I think I'll take their word for when they started and not yours. I can't believe you actually believe they spent 2 months only doing bug fixes. Especially since Chestnut primarily does art and most bug fixes would be code related.
If you read the full weekly update from week 118 instead of throwing insults out left, right and centre you'd have seen Magicnuts released the 0.6.02 update that week and not in September. Maybe do a little research yourself before acting all high and mighty.Learn to spell FFS. Again, it's "you're", not "your".
They've done 1st day's work on planning on 13th August. That's the first day they've commited to 0.7.
You claimed it began on 30th July.
You were wrong & proved it yourself.
Same as you were wrong about everything else. Deal with it.
6.02 is the last update & it was released 2 months after the release of 0.6.
That is obviously when work on 0.7 could begin in earnest, which is why that's the date I worked with.
Doing 1 day's planning is starting. It does not mean that any further work was done, whilst 6.01 & .02 were produced.
No-one in their right mind is going to commit a shit ton of time to 0.7, when 0.6 has bugs that need fixing.
Stands to reason they'd fix the foundations, before building another layer on the house.
Entirely logical.
You now claim that spending 2 months doing 2 releases of bug-fixes is implausible.
So you obviously know how many bugs there were, what each bug was & how long it took to fix, right?
Do you fuck.
Chestnut was out of action for 2 periods, she gave birth & was hopsitalised in a separate incident.
So most bug fixes being code related means nothing at all, if the person who does the code is the only one able to work.
Everyone knows that, it's 42.The battle of the math gods. Soon they will find the answer what the meaning of life it, just by crossing numbers like swords.
Ya, It was a pretty pointless discussion. I wouldn't have chimed in with my 2 cents normally but I felt he was being unnecessarily rude to Mario Itsathree earlier.The battle of the math gods. Soon they will find the answer what the meaning of life it, just by crossing numbers like swords.
Ha ha, nicely done! Mr. Adams would delight.Everyone knows that, it's 42.