- Feb 26, 2021
- 1,288
- 2,781
I've made this point, purely based on the system itself. I've made no negative (or positive) statements about these developers. Human nature being what it is, we do things mostly on financial incentive. Money is what we need to eat, provide housing, take care of our loved one's, etc. It's why with a project like these, games, I prefer to to offer financial incentive for finished projects.So, because you've seen some devs behave like assholes, does that automatically mean that every dev is going to be one?
I've met a few con-men, it doesn't mean that I automatically assume every person I meet is one.
So we agree then. Considering how many people expect a finished game from these projects, I don't think many people go into sponsoring a project with an attitude that they don't care whether the game is finished or not. It would appear that most people view these patron payments like an investment into a finished product. Like perhaps a Kickstarter campaign.Of course it doesn't offer incentive to finish projects. It never claimed to, that's not what a patron does.
It's why people get irritated if it looks like all their money went to nothing (an unfinished game) and it's also why, if folks have been donating for a while, they may be reluctant to pull out of a project. They don't want to see something they invested in fail.