- Jun 3, 2017
- 994
- 1,534
I guess it boils down to two things:Ah! Now we're getting into the meat of it. Why?
1) (Axiom) Nice guys want more out of a relationship than just sex.
2) (Observation) When relationships involve more than just sex, jealousy is inevitable.
Clearly, I'm projecting my observation here. Regardless of his intentions, I expect the achievement of his desire to have lots of gratuitous sex to end in heartache, if not catastrophe, so I can't see him as a nice guy. And that's not even considering things like accidental pregnancy or transmission of STDs.
To put it another way, I wouldn't want my hypothetical daughter involved with a guy who I knew was having lots of gratuitous sex.
The only real assumption is that polyamory/polygamy is generally unsustainable and emotionally unhealthy. This isn't a moral/ethical position, but a consequence of my understanding of human nature.I'm not sure I understand this part of what you said. Can you unpack some of the assumptions behind it?
But a situation with a very high ratio of women to men is outside of my experience, so in that context I could more easily entertain the idea polyamory. Same in any fictional universe where most of the major characters are female.
Edit: Forgot to respond to this from your earlier post.
I don't really understand the distinction of route vs branch.But if you treat MC Choices as alternate routes, rather than branches in the narrative, suddenly the "extra work" becomes less of a waste and more part of the appeal.
Last edited: