it has been noted that your listing was intended as opinion, not fact, an assessment wherewith i find myself in agreement, for its character is conjectural, stacking supposition on supposition, building not a house on sand but a castle in the sky, therefore its concluding proposition, if assented to, remains speculative and whether it is true we know not.
to the supposition that women constitute the predominant consumer base of netorare fiction, which eaudecologne has answered already with valid objections, i reply that this suffers from a conceptual inclarity. your listing produced asymmetrical reference classes, wherein one group of people are characterised by their gender alone, whereas the other groups, however, find their characterisation in more specific interests or identities, although they are assigned to the other predominant gender explicitly or implicitly, thus like is not compared with like. one may say that this presents women who engage with netorare as if they would be an indifferentiated mass, more statistically problematic is that the listing leaves up in the air whether the alleged majority is relative or absolute. to clarify that point, if we are to suppose that women comprise 47% of netorare consumers and men 53%, this would be a remarkable achievement of approximate gender parity for netorare, however it would be quite improper to assert that women make up the largest category, because this would have been achieved through arbitrary and irregular assignment of reference classes. if we must suppose, on the other hand, that some women are subsumed under another category, such as gooners, which is possible at the least, unlike closeted men which exclude women by definition, one must speak of a fatal inclarity. finally, if you do contend that women are an absolute majority, which appears implausible, your claim by default must bear a particularly heavy burden of proof, which neither the weaker nor the stronger achieve by my estimation, whilst under that premise a further breakdown into subcategories within the female gender would be even more apposite and instructive.
neither am i positive that closeted men, whether they be homosexual or bisexual or pansexual, constitute the second largest category of netorare consumers. for to be in the closet means that one is not open in regards sexual orientation to others, either one's relations or the wider world, it does not mean that one lies to oneself. why many closeted men would have to resort to sissification narratives, which are often subordinate to heterosexual narratives in the same product, in netorare, when they are in the privacy of their home, using their computer in private, unless one assumes that they must necessarily share their computers, which appears to be unwarranted, is unresolved in your argument? are they not free to be engrossed in the same pornography in private as their homosexual, bisexual or pansexual fellows out of the closet? this hypothesis is severely wanting in not only empirical evidence, which your other suppositions need as well, but also of a plausible mechanism.
as for your statement that the gender of most consumers of netorare is not definitely known and that most do not post, therefore that a majority of netorarists may be female indeed, this is correct, but this reeks of a counsel of despair, whereby an unproven and contested hypothesis is salvaged by invoking another, as if one is saving the appearances; one cannot reach an objective conclusion thereby.
surely they'd wanna voice their opinions about ntr like guys do so much. this just doesn't make much sense and women who wanna get off on cheating probably gonna read their novel where heroine gets saved from her boring marriage by a 6'7 billionaire vampire misogynist
