Ren'Py Whispers of Desire [v0.30] [Mr_Fable]

[TonyMurray]

How would you like a teasing route for Neil. So Sarah and Alex see that what Neil is upto. Hatch a plan together and to tease him. Lead him on and leave him hanging in the last moment.

Honestly? I wouldn't see the point in that. You'd get the "it's funny" part of it, but not much else, and I wouldn't see it as worth playing just for the "funny" side. The only way I could see it working and making some sense, which would be crucial, is if there was some reward to it, some tangible reason for them doing it. It can't be to tease him and leave him dangling just to teach him a lesson or something. Maybe it would need to be to build evidence against him to get Eva free from his manipulations, or to stop him going after other women. I think that would be too far too go though, given the actual premise of the game - you wouldn't want to build in all these offshoots that take you away from the actual story you're trying to tell.

You have options at every step of the way, and the way it's looking, regardless of path, you can still say yes or no to individual characters. So those like me, who just don't like Neil, can go down the "sharing" or "cheating" paths but still avoid Neil, and that's all we can ask for of a game like this.

The only thing I have to be careful of is "being nice". I had to redo my initial save as just being polite or even just "not being bitchy" gained me too much Neil relp, so I wasn't able to tell Vincent not to share at the end of the update. Being nice and polite doesn't have to mean I like someone and want to potentially do stuff with them later down the line.

 

[Mr Fable]

it is for NTS route or for 3-4 too?

I think it fits better for NTS. Not route 3 and 4. Just an idea I read somewhere. I think it was suggested in Pr0GamerJohnny s forum.

 

[Mr Fable]

Honestly? I wouldn't see the point in that. You'd get the "it's funny" part of it, but not much else, and I wouldn't see it as worth playing just for the "funny" side. The only way I could see it working and making some sense, which would be crucial, is if there was some reward to it, some tangible reason for them doing it. It can't be to tease him and leave him dangling just to teach him a lesson or something. Maybe it would need to be to build evidence against him to get Eva free from his manipulations, or to stop him going after other women. I think that would be too far too go though, given the actual premise of the game - you wouldn't want to build in all these offshoots that take you away from the actual story you're trying to tell.

You have options at every step of the way, and the way it's looking, regardless of path, you can still say yes or no to individual characters. So those like me, who just don't like Neil, can go down the "sharing" or "cheating" paths but still avoid Neil, and that's all we can ask for of a game like this.

Good idea

 

[Eleanorduval]

Love you interest in all the plot paths... but please do not over extend yourself to a stage where it is not fun to do anymore... Your game your ideas... we'll follow.

no need to worry about it unlike same dev he have the energy and motivation.

 

[Eleanorduval]

Good idea

Yep it is would be awsome that dr eva join team alex and sarah.Many people have evokate the possiblity.

 

[IHATESlowburnBluBallgames]

Frankly, I’d like to see Neil successfully manipulate the wife and take her to pound town via the Hershey Highway. I’m such a romantic.

 

[Joshy92]

Because there is no dirty, hung hobo in this game, I'll choose for Erik to be the couple's bull.

I just hope Erik has a big dick for my sweetheart to get stretched out properly on.

 

[Mr Fable]

Honestly? I wouldn't see the point in that. You'd get the "it's funny" part of it, but not much else, and I wouldn't see it as worth playing just for the "funny" side. The only way I could see it working and making some sense, which would be crucial, is if there was some reward to it, some tangible reason for them doing it. It can't be to tease him and leave him dangling just to teach him a lesson or something. Maybe it would need to be to build evidence against him to get Eva free from his manipulations, or to stop him going after other women. I think that would be too far too go though, given the actual premise of the game - you wouldn't want to build in all these offshoots that take you away from the actual story you're trying to tell.

You have options at every step of the way, and the way it's looking, regardless of path, you can still say yes or no to individual characters. So those like me, who just don't like Neil, can go down the "sharing" or "cheating" paths but still avoid Neil, and that's all we can ask for of a game like this.

The only thing I have to be careful of is "being nice". I had to redo my initial save as just being polite or even just "not being bitchy" gained me too much Neil relp, so I wasn't able to tell Vincent not to share at the end of the update. Being nice and polite doesn't have to mean I like someone and want to potentially do stuff with them later down the line.

Yes, maybe I should raise the limit for that option.

 

[Mr Fable]

Because there is no dirty, hung hobo in this game, I'll choose for Erik to be the couple's bull.

I just hope Erik has a big dick for my sweetheart to get stretched out properly on.

More characters are coming too.

 

[Joshy92]

Interesting. I'm pretty set on Erik for now so it'll have to be some really cool dude for me to have a different favourite.

 

[Mr Fable]

Love you interest in all the plot paths... but please do not over extend yourself to a stage where it is not fun to do anymore... Your game your ideas... we'll follow.

I will keep that in check, make sure it's not too much.

 

[Joshy92]

So I know the game like all games with sharing and NTR is about 'corruption' but I won't be seeing it that way as I play.

In my mind, Sarah & Alex are going to bring in other men to enhance their love making and to show Sarah that she is a beautiful woman who deserves to be worshipped.

 

[TonyMurray]

So I know the game like all games with sharing and NTR is about 'corruption' but I won't be seeing it that way as I play.

In my mind, Sarah & Alex are going to bring in other men to enhance their love making and to show Sarah that she is a beautiful woman who deserves to be worshipped.

Corruption versus sexual liberation (I'm not sure if "liberation" is the best word, but there you go). Corruption has negative connotations, but opening yourself to new experiences doesn't have to be in any way a negative thing. Dev said some stuff a while back (possibly on Patreon) about the loyal path, for instance. There would still be the opportunity to expand the couples' sexual horizons even if they didn't involve anyone else - fetishes don't always require corruption, and they don't always require additional players (and of course, bringing in additional players also doesn't require corruption).

 

[Eleanorduval]

Corruption versus sexual liberation (I'm not sure if "liberation" is the best word, but there you go). Corruption has negative connotations, but opening yourself to new experiences doesn't have to be in any way a negative thing. Dev said some stuff a while back (possibly on Patreon) about the loyal path, for instance. There would still be the opportunity to expand the couples' sexual horizons even if they didn't involve anyone else - fetishes don't always require corruption, and they don't always require additional players (and of course, bringing in additional players also doesn't require corruption).

Tony i guess u speaking about role playing?as long he keep fetish optional no problem.2nd about bring other people/new fetish,dev should respect certtain logic for every paths.Not every fetish are compatible with every paths keep it in mind.

 

[packard1928]

Seem that where the pol is now... It will take a couple more releases to get her to where she is open to someone else.

 

[TonyMurray]

Tony i guess u speaking about role playing?as long he keep fetish optional no problem.2nd about bring other people/new fetish,dev should respect certtain logic for every paths.Not every fetish are compatible with every paths keep it in mind.

Roleplay is a good example, yes. Some toys, bdsm, dress-up, breath play, urination... there are lots of fetishes at various ends of the "mild–hard" scale that are two-player activities (or even one-player activities), and they don't have to involve any corruption. If both players are fully on board, willing participants, then it's wholesome fun - even if some other people might find some of it disgusting or whatever!

 

[Joshy92]

Roleplay is a good example, yes. Some toys, bdsm, dress-up, breath play, urination... there are lots of fetishes at various ends of the "mild–hard" scale that are two-player activities (or even one-player activities), and they don't have to involve any corruption. If both players are fully on board, willing participants, then it's wholesome fun - even if some other people might find some of it disgusting or whatever!

That gives me a good idea for a role play scene. Alex could pretend to be a dirty hobo, and Sarah can pretend that he's knocking her up.

These games rarely have role-playing scenarios, so it could be interesting.

 

[Dealbreaker]

even if some other people might find some of it disgusting or whatever!

or just childish. When adults "play" sexual games, it's never just "playing" or they would be children. This goes together with the illusion that you can stop in the middle like in a poker game (even there you can't if its about money and you are in debt).

 

[Eleanorduval]

That gives me a good idea for a role play scene. Alex could pretend to be a dirty hobo, and Sarah can pretend that he's knocking her up.

These games rarely have role-playing scenarios, so it could be interesting.

Security get this men out of here!

 

[Eleanorduval]

Roleplay is a good example, yes. Some toys, bdsm, dress-up, breath play, urination... there are lots of fetishes at various ends of the "mild–hard" scale that are two-player activities (or even one-player activities), and they don't have to involve any corruption. If both players are fully on board, willing participants, then it's wholesome fun - even if some other people might find some of it disgusting or whatever!

hmm i think is was right to be scared of your creativity