- Feb 20, 2025
- 69
- 60
damnThe world would be different if women were loved for their intelligence
Why does it seem like so many devs are averse to impregnation? (Thread is NOT about implementing pregnancy in games)
- Thread starter JoeTheMC84
- Start date
You somehow made me say breeders with a hard B in my head.
- Jan 4, 2019
- 298
- 633
Yeah, around 10 billions on the planet already, good job uncontrollably throwing more into this world to suffer and compete with each other for a limited resources and opportunities. Literally animals who don't think about the consequences and care only about their desire to spread their seed.
Last edited:
Jesus HK Christ.The world would be different if women were loved for their intelligence
Pregnant sex is actually really good. Does anyone know games focused on that or with lots of that?
- Jan 4, 2019
- 298
- 633
Disclaimer: I just research people behavior and motivations for fun, so don't take my comments as a "personal attack" or "kink-shaming".
One can't just throw away thousands of years of evolution making us value a specific features in a looks\body\behavior, which often correlate with overall health in body or mind, which is vital for our life / survival strategy. Same with the women and what they like in men.The world would be different if women were loved for their intelligence
I knew that something was wrong with you (on subconscious level) in another thread and that my shared strong dislike of both NTR and impreg / pregnancy fetishes has something in common. The only reason I engaged in a conversation with you was that you seemed to be more intelligent than other brain-dead people (just like in a message above) who write about it like a zombies or drooling animals (preg? PREG! when preg? WHERE PREG; i need preg pls)
Last edited:
- Nov 2, 2017
- 1,609
- 1,811
I mean I wouldn't even deny that something is wrong.
It is what it is though.Then again I can discern for myself fetishes or kinks I want to pursue in AVGs and how to behave like a normal human being in discussions or IRL even.
For example I really don't get the fascination about armpit licking or massive bushes on woman. I shake my head and move on if I found something that looked intriguing but notice that this stuff is in it. I tried to start a discussion once about this in a games thread and people got hysterical let me tell you xD
Unfortunately sometimes I just don't sound cohesive because I am bad in explaining things. English is not my native language after all
No offense taken. At the end of the day everyone is allowed to like anything. It is how you behave around it....I guess.
Also it is interesting to engage in conversation with people who really don't like your kink....IF the other side want to engage with it as well and not only throw insults around.
But I see that the thread is derailing more and more so i will stop posting here. Maybe we will find each other on other threads again.
Take care man
Last edited:
For the same reason there aren't any STI's in games. Have a lot of sex without any of the consequences.
- Dec 1, 2021
- 1,732
- 7,308
I guess despite even adding a "Please Read First," addition to the OP some folks still don't get the point of the thread,
I get why full pregnancy isn't in some games.
My question is why, unlike STDs, devs (at least it seems to me) go out of their way to have dialogue explaining why they aren't even willing to let the player head cannon that it might one day happen. Why can't devs, like they do with STDs, just let it go and let players fill in the justification, like they do with STDs?
I hope that clears it up.
- Nov 20, 2017
- 6,174
- 14,635
Suprise, suprise.I guess despite even adding a "Please Read First," addition to the OP some folks still don't get the point of the thread,
If the solution was that easy, the zone would be much less "funnier" than it is.
Most people (like 99.99%) don't want any STDs in a game and most of them are completely fine it the game happens in happy wicked land where STDs are only there if does add something to game and not at randomly like in RL.
Yet with pregancy, impregnation, creampies and all the things, it is different. Some want it to have, some don't want it to have and some don't care. As the causal relatiionship between those (and condoms and morning after pill) is given, to avoid it some devs may result to the "I'm on the pill", "Pull it out" whatever talk. Where the ones on the other side of the spectrum goes for the "I want to breed you" approach.
And as well all aware of the some of the zoners here, they will go into the thread of game and for sure write: I creampie her, she say she's pregnant according to a test, yet you utterly useless dev only added 3 sentence for that. That doesn't cut your milker, add more content for that!
So, I assume, some devs wanted to be 120% sure that all their players know that it will never happen and that it is a toddler free zone.
Yes, a toddler-free zone as opposed to a free toddler zone.
It's all about the niche the game is for and is enjoyed by.
- Jul 13, 2021
- 531
- 1,847
Personally, I think the OP is reading a bit much into the reason why a lot of devs don't add the possibility of pregnancy.
For one, it's just not everyone's kink, and if the devs don't like some kink, the chances that they add it to their game are slim.
Also, unless you want to be *really* cheap about it (which is often criticized by preg fans), you need to carefully build your game story around it. If it's an adventure game, does it make sense for the female lead to go around beating the shit out of people while pregnant? It might be realistic at some stages of the story, but there are plenty of times where the dev would have to be like "nuh-uh you cannot get preg here because... reasons" so that it doesn't clash with the plot.
I'm not a fan of the kink, but I have enjoyed a few games which have pregnancy as an important aspect of the game's progress. The game Monster Girl 1000 is a good example, and pregnancy makes perfect sense there because it's the initial premise of the game. I personally think pregnancy stuff is not something that can be thoughtlessly added like some other kinks, because it makes or breaks the story of a game.
For one, it's just not everyone's kink, and if the devs don't like some kink, the chances that they add it to their game are slim.
Also, unless you want to be *really* cheap about it (which is often criticized by preg fans), you need to carefully build your game story around it. If it's an adventure game, does it make sense for the female lead to go around beating the shit out of people while pregnant? It might be realistic at some stages of the story, but there are plenty of times where the dev would have to be like "nuh-uh you cannot get preg here because... reasons" so that it doesn't clash with the plot.
I'm not a fan of the kink, but I have enjoyed a few games which have pregnancy as an important aspect of the game's progress. The game Monster Girl 1000 is a good example, and pregnancy makes perfect sense there because it's the initial premise of the game. I personally think pregnancy stuff is not something that can be thoughtlessly added like some other kinks, because it makes or breaks the story of a game.
Maybe im the strange one but its exactly that risk with the consequences of pregnancy that gets me going. And for the risky sex fetish to work, the stuff OP complains about is partly needed, cause (ideally F) MC freaking out about it is part of the fantasy.
- Jan 6, 2020
- 142
- 285
What's wrong? I left my friend when I found out she was pregnant and I don't regret anything.
- Jan 4, 2019
- 298
- 633
Yet they write about it as if it's everyone's kink and as if it should be everywhere
Just look, today I just opened a thread where I wrote yesterday and (surprise!) there's yet another message about this:
https://f95zone.to/threads/the-libido-enigma-ch-8-broiler_x.196951/post-16511527
It looks:
1) retarded as fuck:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
2) annoying as fuck (imagine everyone asked for his specific fetish everywhere and tried to promote it):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
People still be doing it even after this.I guess despite even adding a "Please Read First," addition to the OP some folks still don't get the point of the thread,
I get why full pregnancy isn't in some games.
My question is why, unlike STDs, devs (at least it seems to me) go out of their way to have dialogue explaining why they aren't even willing to let the player head cannon that it might one day happen. Why can't devs, like they do with STDs, just let it go and let players fill in the justification, like they do with STDs?
I hope that clears it up.
Time for a new guide "So, you want to reply in a F95Zone thread."
- Nov 20, 2017
- 6,174
- 14,635
And this would be read more often than the general rules? Surely, you don't believe it?People still be doing it even after this.
- Dec 1, 2021
- 1,732
- 7,308
- Jul 13, 2021
- 531
- 1,847
In my defense, I'm retarded, so expecting me to read literally the first paragraph of the OP in big ass font is kind of asking a lot. With that, I rest my casePeople still be doing it even after this.
Jokes and my stupidity aside, while the approach of "just don't mention it and let people imagine it" might seem fine at first glance, I don't think it works that well in practice? I guess it could work if the story takes place in a very short time frame, in which there isn't time to notice the belly changes, but otherwise it wouldn't make sense imo.
To me, unless the story actively uses pregnancy as a plot device or mechanic, it makes sense that it is often explicitly disregarded as never happening, because having kids is often seen as the end of "total freedom" and the start of "serious responsibility". In other words, maybe gooners and gooner devs are just averse to responsibility?
As for STDs, my guess is diseases are those things in stories that you can easily just assume they'll never happen unless used as a plot device, while impregnation is often seen as inevitable if done enough times.