Unreal Engine Wild Life [2024.12.13 Full Build 1] [Adeptus Steve]

[hakarlman]

Brother in Christ are you legitimately trying to argue Wild Life is literally just a gallery with clips of sex? The entire sandbox mode doesn't exist? The content created using sandbox tools doesn't exist? The WIP story mode doesn't exist?

I get people being impatient and tired of waiting, but come on now. If it was just a scene viewer like you're claiming I honesty question the sanity of some people that keep returning to this thread that chooses to follow this game instead of just watching porn somewhere else.

Being disingenuous doesn't make the game progress any faster. If folks are shitting on devs, atleast make it about actual problems with the game currently and not made up bs. It's one thing to not like sandbox, but to try to act like it doesn't exist to make it seem like the game has less content/features overall makes your argument weak, especially when there are people posting user made content using sandbox in this very thread every few days. Hell there's even a community server specifically for sharing sandbox content.

If some of you guys are to the point you have to create issues to justify raging at the game, maybe it's time to take a step back and look at other games for a while.

Sandbox is indeed a Scene Viewer, because 99% of the functionality is in EDIT MODE, that means you're constructing a scene, and when you finish constructing the scene, you VIEW it by exiting edit mode. The entire premise is built around creating a scene, then viewing it; hence, a scene viewer; Sandbox is indeed still a Scene Viewer.

In order for it to be a sandbox, it needs basic gameplay features. I would list them, but I've done it so many times in the past 3-4 years, and ICCH_HOW just ignores it and instead adds really bizarre niche features; trying to force everyone to code, but you can't code and jack off at the same time, and he doesn't understand that. He never bothers adding basic gameplay features that would appeal to 99% of players who just want to jack off. Adeptus Steve can't even figure out how to create a basic system so the sex animations are not baked into the furniture;

EDIT: Here are the basic gameplay features, this is the core.
WILD LIFE DEVS: if you want to prevent baking furniture into a sex animation, do this:
1. Streamline Character Data Types into one type
[Play Mode]
2. Posses Max; invite Maya and Bol into a party.
3. Universal Pose Menu shows available sex animations based upon the state of the party and the NPC's
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and they are all standing around, the universal pose menu will show animations based upon their STANDING state,and whether or not an NPC is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER within the party. They already have most of this functionality done with the Add Character data type
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and you press E on a bed Furniture, it needs to check to see if an NPC in a party is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER, if Max and Maya are PARTICIPANTS, then pressing E on bed furniture will result in max & maya sitting on the bed as a paired animation prelude, then the universal pose menu shows all available compatible sex animations for that bed based on max & maya skeletal pairing. Meanwhile, BOL is set to OBSERVER, so he will stand and watch the action. This sets the stage for rapid partner swapping. If you possess BOL, it will show all available animations based upon his SOLO OBSERVER state, so he can smoke, jack off, dance, whatever. IF you possess Maya, and she's sitting on a bed with Max in a paired animation, it shows all compatible bed sex animations. If you possess BOL again, the universal pose menu shows all animations compatible with BOL being solo. Get it? If ICCH_HOW & Adeptus Steve could take 2 minutes to just read and comprehend this, they'll see it's a very, very efficient, basic gameplay system; based on the design from other porn game products. I'm not just pulling this shit out of my ass, like ICCH_HOW constantly does, my advice is based on hard data.

The above is an example of basic gameplay, if the game was open source, I could add the above features for FREE. I could then perform mouse and key optimization, so you can do things as fast as possible with ONE HAND, so your other hand can play with your dick or vagina, lol.

 

[lg123]

Sandbox is indeed a Scene Viewer, because 99% of the functionality is in EDIT MODE, that means you're constructing a scene, and when you finish constructing the scene, you VIEW it by exiting edit mode. The entire premise is built around creating a scene, then viewing it; hence, a scene viewer; Sandbox is indeed still a Scene Viewer.

In order for it to be a sandbox, it needs basic gameplay features. I would list them, but I've done it so many times in the past 3-4 years, and ICCH_HOW just ignores it and instead adds really bizarre niche features; trying to force everyone to code, but you can't code and jack off at the same time, and he doesn't understand that. He never bothers adding basic gameplay features that would appeal to 99% of players who just want to jack off. Adeptus Steve can't even figure out how to create a basic system so the sex animations are not baked into the furniture;

EDIT: Here are the basic gameplay features, this is the core.
WILD LIFE DEVS: if you want to prevent baking furniture into a sex animation, do this:
1. Streamline Character Data Types into one type
[Play Mode]
2. Posses Max; invite Maya and Bol into a party.
3. Universal Pose Menu shows available sex animations based upon the state of the party and the NPC's
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and they are all standing around, the universal pose menu will show animations based upon their STANDING state,and whether or not an NPC is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER within the party. They already have most of this functionality done with the Add Character data type
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and you press E on a bed Furniture, it needs to check to see if an NPC in a party is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER, if Max and Maya are PARTICIPANTS, then pressing E on bed furniture will result in max & maya sitting on the bed as a paired animation prelude, then the universal pose menu shows all available compatible sex animations for that bed based on max & maya skeletal pairing. Meanwhile, BOL is set to OBSERVER, so he will stand and watch the action. This sets the stage for rapid partner swapping. If you possess BOL, it will show all available animations based upon his SOLO OBSERVER state, so he can smoke, jack off, dance, whatever. IF you possess Maya, and she's sitting on a bed with Max in a paired animation, it shows all compatible bed sex animations. If you possess BOL again, the universal pose menu shows all animations compatible with BOL being solo. Get it? If ICCH_HOW & Adeptus Steve could take 2 minutes to just read and comprehend this, they'll see it's a very, very efficient, basic gameplay system; based on the design from other porn game products. I'm not just pulling this shit out of my ass, like ICCH_HOW constantly does, my advice is based on hard data.

The above is an example of basic gameplay, if the game was open source, I could add the above features for FREE. I could then perform mouse and key optimization, so you can do things as fast as possible with ONE HAND, so your other hand can play with your dick or vagina, lol.

I think ostim from skyrim does a system similar? Been a while.

Anyway, this thread has turned fairly disheartening overall. Its getting almost personal to some people and that should be the queue for users to step away for a few months (years) and move on. I would hazard a guess that steve would rather not take certain peoples money if it means less of... whatever this thread has become.

example;

Get it? If ICCH_HOW & Adeptus Steve could take 2 minutes to just read and comprehend this, they'll see it's a very, very efficient, basic gameplay system

From the outside looking in, everything is very easy and efficient. I imagine if you had some how pulled off reverse engineering the demo, you might look at what you're saying here and realizing you're off the mark... or you could be right, only steve knows. Point is though, you and I don't know how this is all stitched together, and whether or not its held on with paper clips, or that they're working on "under the hood" stuff now so that implementing features/gameplay/animations that all work together take far less time - building up to streamline future production.

I'm seeing some new names point out what I've stated as shortcomings in wildlife and if 2024 ends up looking like 2022 and 23 level of development, I'd expect that to continue.

 

[SortaLewd]

Sandbox is indeed a Scene Viewer, because 99% of the functionality is in EDIT MODE, that means you're constructing a scene, and when you finish constructing the scene, you VIEW it by exiting edit mode. The entire premise is built around creating a scene, then viewing it; hence, a scene viewer; Sandbox is indeed still a Scene Viewer.

In order for it to be a sandbox, it needs basic gameplay features. I would list them, but I've done it so many times in the past 3-4 years, and ICCH_HOW just ignores it and instead adds really bizarre niche features; trying to force everyone to code, but you can't code and jack off at the same time, and he doesn't understand that. He never bothers adding basic gameplay features that would appeal to 99% of players who just want to jack off. Adeptus Steve can't even figure out how to create a basic system so the sex animations are not baked into the furniture;

EDIT: Here are the basic gameplay features, this is the core.
WILD LIFE DEVS: if you want to prevent baking furniture into a sex animation, do this:
1. Streamline Character Data Types into one type
[Play Mode]
2. Posses Max; invite Maya and Bol into a party.
3. Universal Pose Menu shows available sex animations based upon the state of the party and the NPC's
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and they are all standing around, the universal pose menu will show animations based upon their STANDING state,and whether or not an NPC is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER within the party. They already have most of this functionality done with the Add Character data type
- Example, if Max, Maya and Bol are in a party, and you press E on a bed Furniture, it needs to check to see if an NPC in a party is set to PARTICIPANT or OBSERVER, if Max and Maya are PARTICIPANTS, then pressing E on bed furniture will result in max & maya sitting on the bed as a paired animation prelude, then the universal pose menu shows all available compatible sex animations for that bed based on max & maya skeletal pairing. Meanwhile, BOL is set to OBSERVER, so he will stand and watch the action. This sets the stage for rapid partner swapping. If you possess BOL, it will show all available animations based upon his SOLO OBSERVER state, so he can smoke, jack off, dance, whatever. IF you possess Maya, and she's sitting on a bed with Max in a paired animation, it shows all compatible bed sex animations. If you possess BOL again, the universal pose menu shows all animations compatible with BOL being solo. Get it? If ICCH_HOW & Adeptus Steve could take 2 minutes to just read and comprehend this, they'll see it's a very, very efficient, basic gameplay system; based on the design from other porn game products. I'm not just pulling this shit out of my ass, like ICCH_HOW constantly does, my advice is based on hard data.

The above is an example of basic gameplay, if the game was open source, I could add the above features for FREE. I could then perform mouse and key optimization, so you can do things as fast as possible with ONE HAND, so your other hand can play with your dick or vagina, lol.

Honestly it sounds like you're missing the point of sandbox. What you're saying is the equivalent of booting up a blank scene in Virt-a-mate and expecting content to be laid out for you. That isn't how it works, it has to be made and put together first. In sandbox you start off with a clean slate(unless you're downloading someone else's scene much like VaM) and you shape the scene how you want it yourself. It isn't Minecraft creator mode where you're essentially playing base game with everything freely available, you literally make the content yourself. There are examples of that here and in the sandbox channels talking about how to approach and incorporate different things into scenes to give it more life, just like how there are hundreds of plugins and discussions in VaM to give scenes life.

That doesn't change sandbox into a "viewer" either. Another older game that comes to mind is the sandbox mode in Playstation's Little Big Planet. Sandbox worked very similar there as well. Would you also call that scene viewer?

 

[SortaLewd]

Are you legitimately trying to argue Wild Life is more than "just a gallery with clips of sex"?


What do you think majority of people do in this so called "sandbox" mode? They just watch "clips of sex" then close the so called sandbox mode and the game.

And what "sandbox mode" does anyway? Why is it even called a sandbox? I've played games that had "sandbox" modes that allowed me to freely do whatever the fuck I wanted to do in the game. What does "sandbox mode" do in this so called game? It allows you to walk(WOHOOO!), it allows you to put different clothes on characters(OMG BEST GAEM EVR!!!!11!!) and it allows you to place sex animations here and there(TOOOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN A 3D ANIMATION VIEWER). Oh and it also allows you to put down a few assets and light sources so you can pretend you are playing a very shitty version of minecraft. And you call this "content"? If this is called content the first version of minecraft actually had more sandbox content than this game BY FAR. And by first I really mean it, alpha, beta, demo, early access or whatever they were called at that time.


"story mode" was a WIP from the beginning of this project, it is still a WIP. Even after 7+ years of development time it might as well not even exist anymore and nothing of value would be lost.


These so called "content" aren't even worth spending more than 10 minutes playing them. Actually "playing" might be the wrong word. It is more like watching an interactive movie game made by sony except waay more shittier.

I'm on mobile so cant section things properly so will just speak in a blurb and elaborate later if needed.

Yes, WL is more than a gallery where you essentially watch mp4s. Again, being disingenuous helps no one. It doesn't propel the game forward. It doesn't make the devs work faster. It doesnt benefit anyone whatsoever. The devs alone have shared a few example sandbox builds of their own just messing around with things, one being a recreation of Pong and another being a N64 Mario map you could playthrough.

Now, normally I wouldnt fault you for not knowing this because they were shared in the discord server where it could have been missed easily, but you post enough in this thread to have seen the kinds of things people share made from sandbox, so you're likely aware of some of the things it's capable of. You're just downplaying the work that has gone into Sandbox to make it seem like the devs have been playing with Patron money all these years with nothing to show for it.


Sandbox is called sandbox because it's literally a sandbox. You know, like the box full of sand that mainly children play with to construct sand structures and whatnot? Same idea here. Sandbox starts off with a flatbed of sand/clean slate and users construct whatever they want.

Open world sandboxing is also a thing obviously, but it's different from a sandbox.

You have also been told this, but Sandbox took priority over the story mode for a while, but now the story mode is the main focus. There were patreon posts about this, posts from the devs about this, members sharing this info aswell, but you will likely continue complaining about it so pointless to go back and forth on that.

And lastly, people can feel however they want about the various pieces of usermade content. The point is sandbox is serving its purpose by allowing people to make said content and share it with others.

 

[hakarlman]

Your statements are conflicting. Let's simplify.

That isn't how it works, it has to be made and put together first.

1. Yes. For example, you control Max and invite NPC to a party; putting a group together.
2. Then in EDIT MODE, you would drag out a Bed Furniture Prop.
3. In PLAY MODE, You can press E on the bed, to use it for sex animations.

In sandbox you start off with a clean slate(unless you're downloading someone else's scene much like VaM) and you shape the scene how you want it yourself.

Yes, in my post, this is exactly what I explained. You drag out a bed furniture prop in EDIT MODE, then IN PLAY MODE, you can run the character to the bed, press E on it to have solo or paired sex animations on the bed. This eliminates the problem of baking furniture into a sex animation. This is a true sandbox when you can actually play it.

Yes It isn't Minecraft creator mode where you're essentially playing base game with everything freely available, you literally make the content yourself.

In gaming, it's popular to control a character and press E on furniture to trigger animations, and to be presented with a list of sex animations based upon that sitting state.

This is basic gameplay, and basic gameplay can reach the widest possible audience, because it's simple and fast to get to the sex.

There are examples of that here and in the sandbox channels talking about how to approach and incorporate different things into scenes to give it more life, just like how there are hundreds of plugins and discussions in VaM to give scenes life.

That doesn't change sandbox into a "viewer" either. Another older game that comes to mind is the sandbox mode in Playstation's Little Big Planet. Sandbox worked very similar there as well. Would you also call that scene viewer?

I want basic gameplay. You're trying to argue that Sandbox shouldn't have basic gameplay, but I strongly disagree.

BASIC GAMEPLAY
[EDIT MODE]
1. Add Max, Add Maya
2. Add Bed Furniture Prop
[PLAY MODE]
3. Posesss Max
4. Invite Maya to Party.
5. Press E on Bed.
6. Choose bed sex animations from universal pose menu.

See, how easy that is? That's basic gameplay, it allows players to quickly get to the fapping without the need for CODING, which you seem to be advocating for. This basic gameplay makes all the sex animations more accessible in the simplest possible manner, instead of the complex nightmare the sandbox; scene viewer, currently is.

ICCH_HOW and Adeptus Steve don't understand basic gameplay + accessibility, and they don't realize people are using their product jack off; hence why there is no click/key optimization of any kind, so fapping, while trying to get what you want done, is extremely tedious with a bloated click count.

If the game was open source, I'd fix all this. You'd still have what you want, I'd get what I want, which is just basic gameplay, lol. This is why I playfully make fun of them, because they have no clue what they're doing with the sandbox, I've never seen anyone neglect basic gameplay so severely after so many years, it's nuts.

In "sandbox", Maya literally cannot sit in a god damn chair through basic gameplay after all these years, do you know how insane that is?

 

[SortaLewd]

Your statements are conflicting. Let's simplify.



1. Yes. For example, you control Max and invite NPC to a party; putting a group together.
2. Then in EDIT MODE, you would drag out a Bed Furniture Prop.
3. In PLAY MODE, You can press E on the bed, to use it for sex animations.



Yes, in my post, this is exactly what I explained. You drag out a bed furniture prop in EDIT MODE, then IN PLAY MODE, you can run the character to the bed, press E on it to have solo or paired sex animations on the bed. This eliminates the problem of baking furniture into a sex animation. This is a true sandbox when you can actually play it.



In gaming, it's popular to control a character and press E on furniture to trigger animations, and to be presented with a list of sex animations based upon that sitting state.

This is basic gameplay, and basic gameplay can reach the widest possible audience, because it's simple and fast to get to the sex.



I want basic gameplay. You're trying to argue that Sandbox shouldn't have basic gameplay, but I strongly disagree.

BASIC GAMEPLAY
[EDIT MODE]
1. Add Max, Add Maya
2. Add Bed Furniture Prop
[PLAY MODE]
3. Posesss Max
4. Invite Maya to Party.
5. Press E on Bed.
6. Choose bed sex animations from universal pose menu.

See, how easy that is? That's basic gameplay, it allows players to quickly get to the fapping without the need for CODING, which you seem to be advocating for. This basic gameplay makes all the sex animations more accessible in the simplest possible manner, instead of the complex nightmare the sandbox; scene viewer, currently is.

ICCH_HOW and Adeptus Steve don't understand basic gameplay + accessibility, and they don't realize people are using their product jack off; hence why there is no click/key optimization of any kind, so fapping, while trying to get what you want done, is extremely tedious with a bloated click count.

If the game was open source, I'd fix all this. You'd still have what you want, I'd get what I want, which is just basic gameplay, lol. This is why I playfully make fun of them, because they have no clue what they're doing with the sandbox, I've never seen anyone neglect basic gameplay so severely after so many years, it's nuts.

In "sandbox", Maya literally cannot sit in a god damn chair through basic gameplay after all these years, do you know how insane that is?

You're still missing the point of Sandbox. Sandbox doesn't exist to provide you mechanics that doesn't normally exist otherwise. You absolutely can make them yourself though, you're just refusing to do so hence me saying you're missing the point of Sandbox. It's there to create and share usermade content. You want x,y,z? The Sandbox tools are there for you make such things. You want to be able to summon furniture props and be able to trigger animations? The sandbox tools literally let's you do this, and you can also make custom animations for furniture props to your liking. You want content that can easily be played with one hand? Make it. Again, that's what Sandbox is. You make the content you want.

It's not that I'm advocating for making things difficult, it's that you're entirely missing the point and as a result suggesting things that conflict with how sandbox functions. You're putting the cart before the horse. You want to place a bed, interact with the bed, and get a selection of sex animations for the bed prop but you dont want to be the one to make any of it. That defeats the purpose of sandbox. You make things yourself or download what someone else made. It's not up to the devs to go changing how they create animations because you don't want to use sandbox like anyone else that put effort into learning the tools to make what they want.

Look at Virt-A-Mate(VaM) for example. There's all kinds of interactive scenes you can download and play with, but guess what? Those very scenes with all those interactions, animations, customization options, and whatnot started off as a blank scene and someone had to make and put together everything before the scene became the final product that was published and downloadable. Same concept with Wild Life sandbox.


Also I dont get your point about not being able to sit in chairs. How is that a priority in a wip porn game? What do I lose or gain by being able to or not being able to sit in a chair in the game's current state? The last thing we need is a situation like Star Citizen where devs put a bunch of time into meaningless things that have no current function in the game at the moment.

 

[Purple_Heart]

Bro out here in tears typing essays over an unfinished porn game, cant get more retarded than that. Maybe go out once in a while

Still continuing with random insults, in defense of a scam nonetheless. Go touch grass like I've said before, it may help you calm down and allow you to think using your brain instead of your dick.

 

[Purple_Heart]

You're just downplaying the work that has gone into Sandbox to make it seem like the devs have been playing with Patron money all these years with nothing to show for it.

Am I really downplaying it though? How many hours you've actually played the sandbox mode? Played is the keyword here. Pretending you are a level designer or something like that doesn't count as playing. All other games I've seen that have sandbox mode actually lets you play them beyond just "create scene/build whatever".

I can provide you a lot of example games from multiple genres, building/simulation games(ex. simcity), tower defense games(ex. the riftbreaker), action/adventure games(ex. no mans sky), games that are literally defined as a sandbox(ex. minecraft) and even gmod which is less of a game and more of a scene creator/viewer very similar to WL yet they all actually let you play the damn thing. Compare any of those games to WL and you'll quickly realize this isn't a sandbox, it is just a scene viewer labeled as sandbox.

Sandbox is called sandbox because it's literally a sandbox. You know, like the box full of sand that mainly children play with to construct sand structures and whatnot? Same idea here.

Play you say? Ok, so just call me when you can play "open world rpg" in this so called sandbox mode similar to how you can play any other game's sandbox mode, okay? I don't expect your call anytime soon, infact I don't expect you to call me ever because considering the development time of this game either we would be dead of old age or it will be stuck in development hell and eventually abandoned forever after milking patreon cows for years.

You have also been told this, but Sandbox took priority over the story mode for a while, but now the story mode is the main focus.

Okay brother in christ, lets forget everything that has happened with this game so far and just focus on the current thing "story mode is the priority NOW". Which begs the question, why wasn't it priority BEFORE?

This is the part where you're gonna say "but it was, story mode/map has been reworked for sextillionth time before" and I am gonna say "but why tho?". This is the question that should be asked for every single update. They "upgraded" to unreal engine 5 but why tho? They remade map again but why tho? They added sandbox but why tho? They added ability to play pong in sandbox but why tho? They added a bunch of new sex animations even though this "game" already has more animations than needed to actually develop the game but why tho?

Don't you STILL get it? It is almost as if they are doing anything but actually developing the game. They probably don't want to finish this game because that would mean end of precious monthly patreon income. You can't be this dumb/blind whatever to NOT see/recognize the pattern of some seriously bad management. You have to be able to understand this all even if you think this isn't a scam but it was all series of bad coincidences/bad decisions/whatever you want to call it.

And lastly, people can feel however they want about the various pieces of usermade content. The point is sandbox is serving its purpose by allowing people to make said content and share it with others.

Missing the point. The point of any game. The literal definition of a game. It should be made to be P L A Y E D, not W A T C H E D. Even fucking illusion games have a game side to them that allows you to P L A Y it and you know what? They call the other side S T U D I O mode and it is even a different executable from the game because there is nothing to P L A Y there. Does this ring any bells?

 

[hersheyscookies]

Is there Is anyway to make skeleton Shey-futa using a Bob skeleton? She Is lack of positions and I wonder If there Is any mod or way to make Shey-futa using a more positions than now :/

Bump!

This would be awesome!
Even if it's a version of Shey-Futa without the pussy so she could fit perfectly on a male skeleton about her height. As the game currently is, there are so few futa positions.
Damn, it wouldn't be so hard to just get all the respective positions from female Shey into Shey-Futa either, would it? Same body.... Just a cock dangling up and down as she gets fucked by the Minotaurs, Lions and etc.
Futas need more love on Wildlife.

 

[SortaLewd]

Am I really downplaying it though? How many hours you've actually played the sandbox mode? Played is the keyword here. Pretending you are a level designer or something like that doesn't count as playing. All other games I've seen that have sandbox mode actually lets you play them beyond just "create scene/build whatever".

I can provide you a lot of example games from multiple genres, building/simulation games(ex. simcity), tower defense games(ex. the riftbreaker), action/adventure games(ex. no mans sky), games that are literally defined as a sandbox(ex. minecraft) and even gmod which is less of a game and more of a scene creator/viewer very similar to WL yet they all actually let you play the damn thing. Compare any of those games to WL and you'll quickly realize this isn't a sandbox, it is just a scene viewer labeled as sandbox.



Play you say? Ok, so just call me when you can play "open world rpg" in this so called sandbox mode similar to how you can play any other game's sandbox mode, okay? I don't expect your call anytime soon, infact I don't expect you to call me ever because considering the development time of this game either we would be dead of old age or it will be stuck in development hell and eventually abandoned forever after milking patreon cows for years.


Okay brother in christ, lets forget everything that has happened with this game so far and just focus on the current thing "story mode is the priority NOW". Which begs the question, why wasn't it priority BEFORE?

This is the part where you're gonna say "but it was, story mode/map has been reworked for sextillionth time before" and I am gonna say "but why tho?". This is the question that should be asked for every single update. They "upgraded" to unreal engine 5 but why tho? They remade map again but why tho? They added sandbox but why tho? They added ability to play pong in sandbox but why tho? They added a bunch of new sex animations even though this "game" already has more animations than needed to actually develop the game but why tho?

Don't you STILL get it? It is almost as if they are doing anything but actually developing the game. They probably don't want to finish this game because that would mean end of precious monthly patreon income. You can't be this dumb/blind whatever to NOT see/recognize the pattern of some seriously bad management. You have to be able to understand this all even if you think this isn't a scam but it was all series of bad coincidences/bad decisions/whatever you want to call it.


Missing the point. The point of any game. The literal definition of a game. It should be made to be P L A Y E D, not W A T C H E D. Even fucking illusion games have a game side to them that allows you to P L A Y it and you know what? They call the other side S T U D I O mode and it is even a different executable from the game because there is nothing to P L A Y there. Does this ring any bells?

Yes, you are downplaying the work that went into Sandbox. Maybe you forget, but all the previous builds are still on Patreon, and old patch notes are still listed on Patreon and in the changelog on the first page of this thread. Meaning you can literally go back and view the progress and see all the new functionality come into Sandbox over the years all the way till now. It isn't hidden.


As for you trying to make a distinction between building and active gameplay(as in the other genres that make up a game other than sandbox/building), time spent in sandbox is still part of playing the game. Maybe you personally view it differently, but if I boot up Fallout 4 for example and spend 3 hours doing nothing but sitting in workshop building a base, that's still playing the game. Something else to consider thats very obvious; the game isn't complete. WL still lacks a lot of functionality as far as combat or survival elements or whatever. No matter how much you complain, the game isn't going to magically finalize within the hour, or tomorrow, or next month. Throwing tantrums because the devs aren't prioritizing what you wish they did or because they aren't working at the pace you think they should won't change that.

Also it's interesting that you even try to make a distinction between sandbox and active gameplay in the first place. When people play Minecraft even while in creator mode, no one goes and say, "yeah man I'm in minecraft but I'm not playing right now, I'm just building some stuff".

The story wasnt the priority before because Sandbox was. Sandbox has been in this game as far back as 2016 iirc when it was just the map on the beach. Back then it lacked all the newer functionality obviously, but sandbox isn't new it wasn't just added within the last few years. All your "but whys" would be answered if you just listened to people explaining to you or you just read the patreon posts. It honestly seems like you're so dead set on believing you're right and this game is a scam you have no intention of reading any of the info on the history of this game and it makes my curious why are you even here then? According to you this is just a scene viewer with no content and is clearly a scam being milked by the devs... why are you still so invested? What keeps you coming back to an empty game as you essentially claim it to be?

Btw is Illusion deciding to separate the creator from the main gameplay supposed to have some kind of significance? Thats just how they chose to go about it. Just so you know, Home Together is another porn game that does it similar to Wild Life.

 

[SortaLewd]

Bump!

This would be awesome!
Even if it's a version of Shey-Futa without the pussy so she could fit perfectly on a male skeleton about her height. As the game currently is, there are so few futa positions.
Damn, it wouldn't be so hard to just get all the respective positions from female Shey into Shey-Futa either, would it? Same body.... Just a cock dangling up and down as she gets fucked by the Minotaurs, Lions and etc.
Futas need more love on Wildlife.

One of the devs showed what happens when you slap a skeleton from character onto another character it wasnt designed for and essentially it deforms the character and turns them into eldritch beings. Doesnt work properly.

 

[Purple_Heart]

if I boot up Fallout 4 for example and spend 3 hours doing nothing but sitting in workshop building a base, that's still playing the game.

Yes, because fallout 4 is a GAME. The things you build in it have direct gameplay value because they change how you PLAY the GAME.

No matter how much you complain, the game isn't going to magically finalize within the hour, or tomorrow, or next month.

Who said I am complaining because I think doing that would "magically finalize within the hour, or tomorrow, or next month."?

Throwing tantrums because the devs aren't prioritizing what you wish they did

Replying to bootl- ahem fanboys and shutting down their ridicilous excuses isn't the same as "throwing tantrums".

or because they aren't working at the pace you think they should won't change that.

Name 10 games that took more than 7 years to develop and still came out as a good game. Without googling, just from your memory. I bet you cannot do it. It isn't just what "I" think. Now, by all means go ahead and do use google, research and see what others think about this matter, see what others think about games that are stuck in development hell for years(whether intentional or not doesn't even matter at this point). And after witnessing the results of your own research come talk to me again about what "I" and only "I" think.

All your "but whys" would be answered if you just listened to people explaining to you or you just read the patreon posts.

Yeah let me read all those excuses about how being able to play pong in a porn game matters more than implementing rpg mechanics to a game that claims to be an open world rpg Maybe some people fell for those crappy excuses but I sure as fuck won't be falling for them. I have been playing porn games and games in general long enough to know the difference between legit problems with development and crappy excuses that are only there to prolong it.

It honestly seems like you're so dead set on believing you're right and this game is a scam

According to you this is just a scene viewer with no content and is clearly a scam being milked by the devs... why are you still so invested?

Oh man, the game would surely magically improve instantly if no people criticized it and everyone praised it instead

What keeps you coming back to an empty game as you essentially claim it to be?

I know damn well this game will never came out as promised, if it ever comes out(big if). Your answer is bootlickers and their pathetic excuse posts. Ever noticed how almost all of my posts in this thread are replies to other posts? No? Well, now you know.

Just so you know, Home Together is another porn game that does it similar to Wild Life.

Yes, very similar indeed. No gameplay, only sex animation viewer. Difference: only one of those claims to be an open world rpg.

 

[JRGrass1414]

Does anybody know how to set up an event sequence with a single transformer?

I figured out how to make a prop move from point A to point B in a straight line.

But I would like it to do the following: move from point A to point B, then turn 90 degrees, then move from point B to point C. I would assume I have to set up 3 actions in a sequence. I can do it with 3 different props and 3 corresponding transformers, but can it be done with a single transformer+prop?

Alternatively, would it be easier if I set up 3 transformer+prop and just make the first disappear right when the second one appears on turn action and then the second disappear when the third appears?

 

[GerP1]

Damn. This catboy is mad.

 

[GerP1]

Does anybody know how to set up an event sequence with a single transformer?

I figured out how to make a prop move from point A to point B in a straight line.

But I would like it to do the following: move from point A to point B, then turn 90 degrees, then move from point B to point C. I would assume I have to set up 3 actions in a sequence. I can do it with 3 different props and 3 corresponding transformers, but can it be done with a single transformer+prop?

Alternatively, would it be easier if I set up 3 transformer+prop and just make the first disappear right when the second one appears on turn action and then the second disappear when the third appears?

View attachment 3350310

You need to use either camera path or several transformer blocks. However I would just wait at this point to make something complex like that. We are getting animation sequence system in future update:

You must be registered to see the links

Basically keyframe animation system as far as I understand.

But in theory you could alter single transformer block by grouping it up (so it's master is not the game world);
- in set option value field you write trigger names and EndLocation/StartLocation coordinates and on reached end triggers 2nd changed coordinates. to change coordinates infinitely as many time as you want im not sure. Maybe with delay blocks...
- after this is set you need to have in reached end triggers in order: StartLocation (with coordinates block is at the first reached end)->Set To Start->EndLocation- (with coordinates where block is supposed to travel next)>Move to end->

 

[SortaLewd]

Yes, because fallout 4 is a GAME. The things you build in it have direct gameplay value because they change how you PLAY the GAME.

And who are you to say there's no gameplay value in sandbox? If it took priority and people clearly appreciated what was added then that tells you it was valued. You personally just dislike it. I really don't see how you're failing to realize this. You're throwing tantrums as if the devs worked on Sandbox and decided to abandon the rest of the planned features when that isn't the case.

Who said I am complaining because I think doing that would "magically finalize within the hour, or tomorrow, or next month."?

Then what exactly are you hoping to accomplish here? What is the end goal with your tantrums?

Replying to bootl- ahem fanboys and shutting down their ridicilous excuses isn't the same as "throwing tantrums".

What exactly are you shutting down? People telling you pretty much what the devs themselves have said? What is gained by doing so? Again, if you think this is a scam and the devs are so scummy, what keeps you coming back?

Name 10 games that took more than 7 years to develop and still came out as a good game. Without googling, just from your memory. I bet you cannot do it. It isn't just what "I" think. Now, by all means go ahead and do use google, research and see what others think about this matter, see what others think about games that are stuck in development hell for years(whether intentional or not doesn't even matter at this point). And after witnessing the results of your own research come talk to me again about what "I" and only "I" think.

For one, I can't because I don't obsess over video game development time. I play games, if there's a game I don't like I don't keep tabs on it. If there's a game I'm interested in I don't do a countdown until it gets here, there are other games to play in the meantime. The only time I do somewhat actively keep track of games is if I've personally put money in and the developers have done something shady since - for example Project Helius' Fallen Doll. Two, even if I did keep track of development time, what do you gain to prove by my going off memory alone? Like what are you actually trying to cook here? You lost me with this one.

Yeah let me read all those excuses about how being able to play pong in a porn game matters more than implementing rpg mechanics to a game that claims to be an open world rpg Maybe some people fell for those crappy excuses but I sure as fuck won't be falling for them. I have been playing porn games and games in general long enough to know the difference between legit problems with development and crappy excuses that are only there to prolong it.

I'm not sure if you're intentionally being obtuse here or what, but Pong and N64 Mario being made in Sandbox are two examples specifically from the devs to showcase and give ideas of what the Sandbox tools are capable of. I'm not sure how you took what I said and turned it into this.

View attachment 3350240
View attachment 3350241

If you shifted the red box a bit more to the left you'd also see where it says Creating Wild Life
Keyword being Creating


it's almost as if it isn't a finished product and all mechanics aren't in

Oh man, the game would surely magically improve instantly if no people criticized it and everyone praised it instead

I mean, critique is good, but what you are doing isn't critiquing. In all the replies to me so far you literally have not critiqued a single issue with the current state of the game that can be fixed in the short term. You're literally just throwing tantrums. You aren't saying anything constructive. You say, "well the game hasn't made any progress, it's just a mp4 viewer" so I tell you of the Sandbox, some of the things the devs have shown using the Sandbox tools, and where you can find other Sandbox creations made by the community, then you go on to dismiss the Sandbox's capabilities, " pong in a porn game matters more than implementing rpg mechanics to a game that claims to be an open world rpg".

If we're being real you aren't here to critique, you're just complaining for the sake of complaining. You've acknowledged that your complaining won't change anything in the short term yet you're still going to continue doing it despite there being no benefit to it. You're still going to continue downplaying any progress the game has made despite there being a tab full of changelogs listing everything added in the previous patches over the years on the first page of this thread.

You're just using "critique" to justify your tantrum throwing and raging.

I know damn well this game will never came out as promised, if it ever comes out(big if). Your answer is bootlickers and their pathetic excuse posts. Ever noticed how almost all of my posts in this thread are replies to other posts? No? Well, now you know.

No, because I don't visit this thread often. The times I have visited this thread and seen you posting comments it's always the same deal. If there are bootlickers here you're just as dedicated to this game as they are because everytime I see you posting it's complaining about something, and I do mean complaining not critiquing.

Yes, very similar indeed. No gameplay, only sex animation viewer. Difference: only one of those claims to be an open world rpg.

Honestly it sounds like EA/WIP games just aren't for you, which is fair, not everyone should get into these kinds of games either. The fact of the matter is that a lot of people just don't have the patience required to be involved in a game still in development. I still remember people claiming Baldur's Gate 3 was a scam and would never be completed while it was in Early Access because it was delayed and the devs only showed a portion of act 1 the entirety of the EA up until release.

 

[Purple_Heart]

You're throwing tantrums as if the devs worked on Sandbox and decided to abandon the rest of the planned features when that isn't the case.

Sure, not abandoned, just postponed until heat death of universe. But it is all forgotten because they started working on it again now, after all those years, right?

Then what exactly are you hoping to accomplish here? What is the end goal with your tantrums?

What is the "endgoal" for someone who can't stop praising a game that is not even halfway finished, does not have any gameplay, does not have a resemblance to an actual rpg even after 7+ years of dev time? What are YOU hoping to accomplish here by asking me this question but not the others? Does writing "omg best gaem evr!!!!" fix things in short term or even long term, in your opinion?

If you shifted the red box a bit more to the left you'd also see where it says Creating Wild Life
Keyword being Creating

View attachment 3350381
it's almost as if it isn't a finished product and all mechanics aren't in

... for more than 7 years. Yeah, "creating". More like stalling or milking.
Speaking of creating for long times, did you check what people think about that? In your last post you specifically said "I" was the one who thinks like that so I told you to check it yourself.

If we're being real you aren't here to critique, you're just complaining for the sake of complaining.

That is your opinion, you may see me as complaining. In reality I am merely responding to replies like these in the same kind: "omg best game evr!!11111", "absolutely nothing is wrong here", "yeah games really do take billions of dollars of budget and trillions of years to develop!!!!". I bet you don't see any problems with those posts though, those are something positive and this thread should be absolutely filled with them, right?

For one, I can't because I don't obsess over video game development time.

I didn't know knowledge and experience meant obsession, thanks, fellow obsessed pirate.

Two, even if I did keep track of development time, what do you gain to prove by my going off memory alone? Like what are you actually trying to cook here? You lost me with this one.

Nevermind, I just realized you are too smart to understand my point.

No, because I don't visit this thread often. The times I have visited this thread and seen you posting comments it's always the same deal

Funny you should say that, I experience the samething in opposite form, every time I visit this thread yet another person calls this so called game best game ever and attacks anyone who dares to talk about in any negative way.

Honestly it sounds like EA/WIP games just aren't for you, which is fair, not everyone should get into these kinds of games either.

No, I've played my fair share of early access games. I've even participated in still ongoing open beta of broken arrow just a few days ago. But those are games, not scams. All of them eventually released finished game and none of them took 4+ years leave early access/patreon/whatever.

I still remember people claiming Baldur's Gate 3 was a scam and would never be completed while it was in Early Access because it was delayed and the devs only showed a portion of act 1 the entirety of the EA up until release.

How long did it stay in early access and please do not compare it to WL's development. I fear you might accidentally realize this game is a scam. I don't want that, stay in denial please.

 

[Purple_Heart]

I check this thread maybe twice a week

Why are you lying though?

"may help you to calm down" Ok Mr. Third Worlder crying over an essentially free porn game, making you write 100+ messages (each in the size of entire light novels) in this thread alone, idk but you seem heavily mentally retarded - should visit a doc, like seriously. I'm 100% sure you're also suicidal irl.
Keep spamming this thread with your 0 IQ takes, makes this thread bigger and more people buy/play this "scam" game, making you go mentally ill even harder haha

WOMP WOMP

Keep spamming random lies and insults, I am sure it will do you good.

 

[SortaLewd]

Sure, not abandoned, just postponed until heat death of universe. But it is all forgotten because they started working on it again now, after all those years, right?

What do you mean forgotten? They made multiple Patreon posts explaining the reason they switched full focus to Sandbox for a while. I'm pretty sure Steve has probably explained it here as well.

What is the "endgoal" for someone who can't stop praising a game that is not even halfway finished, does not have any gameplay, does not have a resemblance to an actual rpg even after 7+ years of dev time? What are YOU hoping to accomplish here by asking me this question but not the others? Does writing "omg best gaem evr!!!!" fix things in short term or even long term, in your opinion?

I believe blind praise and rampant complaining/bickering are equally unnecessary, but if given the option of someone being peaceful and someone continuously being negative, it's not surprising people will eventually get annoyed by the same people always being negative. Especially when their complaints aren't constructive, is disingenuous, and in general just tantrum throwing. This isn't specifically aimed at you, but you do fit the bill here going by your replies to be honest.

... for more than 7 years. Yeah, "creating". More like stalling or milking.
Speaking of creating for long times, did you check what people think about that? In your last post you specifically said "I" was the one who thinks like that so I told you to check it yourself.

Check what? I'm not sure what you mean. If you're referring to people being tired of waiting, that isn't anything new with open development games. It literally happens with just about every EA game regardless of how long it actually stays in EA. There will always be someone that believes the devs are slacking, trying to milk supporters, or every other possible reason to paint the devs as shady.

That is your opinion, you may see me as complaining. In reality I am merely responding to replies like these in the same kind: "omg best game evr!!11111", "absolutely nothing is wrong here", "yeah games really do take billions of dollars of budget and trillions of years to develop!!!!". I bet you don't see any problems with those posts though, those are something positive and this thread should be absolutely filled with them, right?

I said it in a previous reply, but I don't think there's anything wrong with critiquing the game. If you search my post history in this thread you'd see i've critiqued it myself, but when the same people are always visiting the thread to only bicker without offering anything constructive, most of the time those people are just trying to be killjoys. "I don't like (X) so you shouldn't like it either". Like I said, Fallen Doll was the game I kept tabs on every now and then despite disliking the devs and I was the person being a killjoy for a while, and even though I personally just accepted I don't like the direction the game is going or the developer, I still try to be fair when leaving comments answering or helping others every now and then, so it's easy to see the same kind of behavior in others doing the same things I did with Fallen Doll always being negative.

No, I've played my fair share of early access games. I've even participated in still ongoing open beta of broken arrow just a few days ago. But those are games, not scams. All of them eventually released finished game and none of them took 4+ years leave early access/patreon/whatever.

I can't help but to imagine you believe all developers should be able to develop and complete their games regardless of their team size, the genre of game they're making, the issues they might face, or any obstruction/roadblock that pops up for them. In your mind all EA devs get (2-3 years?) and if the game isn't done by then it's immediately a scam, regardless of how much progress they made and regardless of whether they're consistently updating or not.

How long did it stay in early access and please do not compare it to WL's development. I fear you might accidentally realize this game is a scam. I don't want that, stay in denial please.

It'd be silly to compare both these games' journeys through EA as they're completely different genres and face way different challenges. BG3 went into EA in 2020, so it was in EA for 3 years. I think you've come to the conclusion that because I find tantrum throwing annoying I'm somehow invested in this game to the point I need to be in denial about something. I said it in the post before this but there are so many games to play, and so many porn games on this site. It makes no sense to get caught up on a single one. No i'm not invested in this game. I do wish the devs the best as I see the potential, but that doesn't mean i'm blind to issues or feel the need to be in denial about anything related to this game.

 

[koshmar163]

Does anybody know how to set up an event sequence with a single transformer?

I figured out how to make a prop move from point A to point B in a straight line.

But I would like it to do the following: move from point A to point B, then turn 90 degrees, then move from point B to point C. I would assume I have to set up 3 actions in a sequence. I can do it with 3 different props and 3 corresponding transformers, but can it be done with a single transformer+prop?

Alternatively, would it be easier if I set up 3 transformer+prop and just make the first disappear right when the second one appears on turn action and then the second disappear when the third appears?

View attachment 3350310

You will need 3 transformers. The first transformer is from A to B (in my case its Transformer_013). The second transformer starts where 1 ended and turn on 90 degrees (in my case its Transformer_014). The third transformer starts where second one ended and goes to C (in my case its Transformer_015).

Here is example