CREATE and FUCK your own AI GIRLFRIEND TRY FOR FREE
x

Collection Video Wildeer Studio Collection [2023-11-16] [WildeerStudio]

4.60 star(s) 15 Votes

Icekatana

Active Member
Jul 9, 2017
530
1,980
I get that the animation has no sound and I also get that Wilddeer not only takes way too long to produce content, but also makes bullshit, fake excuses as to why it's taking too long. I'd never give this guy my money, he's borderline a con-artist. I also wasn't all that interested in Gatekeeper before part 4, I never even understood why the series originally got people so excited. I'm the furthest thing from a Wilddeer fan. However, after checking out the newest release...


People complaining about the quality of the animation in part 4 have room-temp IQs. The comments on it in this thread make absolutely no sense to me - "too many fades to black" or "animating isn't his thing" - are you guys on fentanyl? Sniff too many sharpies in elementary school? Staring at the sun for fun in your free time? Smashing your head into your bro's head pretending to be a fucking Pachycephalosaurus and giving yourself CTE? It's 30+ minutes of top tier work. If you think this is anything less than A-tier animation quality, you are objectively retarded. Sorry, just the truth.

No idea what drugs you guys are smoking to think part 4 doesn't slap but I don't want any of it, that's not the good kush.
I don't think he's necessarily bad at animating, but he certainly isn't much above average. Consider that good animators show the transitions and not just a fade to black with the next loop. Also consider the pace at which he works. Good animators get high quality shit done in a fraction of the time. How many times has Wildeer posted stuff about him not being able to figure out fluids or some other problem?

I think that his end result is usually good, and often fappable, but one animation per year does not a good animator make. Don't forget that he also slows the animations down to make them look better/smoother and to inflate the run time.

He's really good at lighting and has made a sexy as fuck model. His animating skills are not his strong suit.
 

xxxDreamZzz

Newbie
Oct 29, 2022
97
155
I don't think he's necessarily bad at animating, but he certainly isn't much above average. Consider that good animators show the transitions and not just a fade to black with the next loop. Also consider the pace at which he works. Good animators get high quality shit done in a fraction of the time. How many times has Wildeer posted stuff about him not being able to figure out fluids or some other problem?

I think that his end result is usually good, and often fappable, but one animation per year does not a good animator make. Don't forget that he also slows the animations down to make them look better/smoother and to inflate the run time.

He's really good at lighting and has made a sexy as fuck model. His animating skills are not his strong suit.
On a technical level he's very good. However, he is also the posterboy for why most directors/animators/musicians/etc. need good editors and producers. Storytellers that know how to cut out the waste and make a film/track seem like it's longer than it is. This opus should be edited down to 16-18 minutes... 20 tops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noonwraith

AREALJERK

Newbie
Feb 23, 2019
15
43
Say what you will about Wildeer, but his work is clearly, indubitably better than "average" and also undoubtedly better than "isn't much above average." Dude is an upper echelon content creator - who has his faults on multiple levels, sure - but questioning the quality of the content output itself is absolutely absurd. My guess is Icekatana faps to the same top 15 to 20 NSFW 3D content creators as the rest of us, and so their perception of the actual quality of work across this so-called industry in its entirety is wildly skewed. Which still isn't an excuse.

I mean, what the fuck are we doing here?

Also, the time it takes between animations isn't even relevant. You can say someone is fast at good animations, but taking a long time between good animations doesn't change the fact that those animations are, you know, good.

All that being said... it's definitely bogus how long it takes Wildeer to create these (admittedly banger) videos. Bordering on suspicious for sure. No doubt about that.
 
Last edited:

claralover

Engaged Member
Nov 2, 2017
2,817
7,270
Say what you will about Wildeer, but his work is clearly, indubitably better than "average" and also undoubtedly better than "isn't much above average." Dude is an upper echelon content creator - who has his faults on multiple levels, sure - but questioning the quality of the content output itself is absolutely absurd. My guess is Icekatana faps to the same top 15 to 20 NSFW 3D content creators as the rest of us, and so their perception of the actual quality of work across this so-called industry in its entirety is wildly skewed. Which still isn't an excuse.

I mean, what the fuck are we doing here?

Also, the time it takes between animations isn't even relevant. You can say someone is fast at good animations, but taking a long time between good animations doesn't change the fact that those animations are, you know, good.

All that being said... it's definitely bogus how long it takes Wildeer to create these (admittedly banger) videos. Bordering on suspicious for sure. No doubt about that.
his only saving grace is the quality of his models, his animations themselves are nothing special
 

RaidenZ

Active Member
Aug 11, 2020
647
1,839
my feedback for part 4:
+very hot thematically
+exceptional models, lighting and image quality
+anal AND vaginal
+cumflation
+very long with a respectable amount of individual scenes

-took an eternity to make
-10s animated loops stretched out to several minutes with different camera angles. a bit too repetitive.
-fairly tame and uninspiring expressions especially during the cumflation
-many of the camera angles hiding the main part of the action being dragged out for way to long. lowkey kills your boner at times
-too long overall. yes it may seem weird to complain about "more" content but similar to p3 you could have trimmed down the lenght probably by half without cutting away a single animation.

and in general the transition between the anal and vaginal scene was very strange its almost comedic. the scene is great tho you just wonder how the fuck she ended up there.


Theres certainly better animators out there but not many filling this nieche and this has probably been Wildeers best work so far. A bit of faith is restored and im looking forward to p5 more than i did towards p4 after seeing how p3 turned out.
 

EdGuy69

Member
Jun 28, 2022
228
538
my feedback for part 4:
+very hot thematically
+exceptional models, lighting and image quality
+anal AND vaginal
+cumflation
+very long with a respectable amount of individual scenes

-took an eternity to make
-10s animated loops stretched out to several minutes with different camera angles. a bit too repetitive.
-fairly tame and uninspiring expressions especially during the cumflation
-many of the camera angles hiding the main part of the action being dragged out for way to long. lowkey kills your boner at times
-too long overall. yes it may seem weird to complain about "more" content but similar to p3 you could have trimmed down the lenght probably by half without cutting away a single animation.

and in general the transition between the anal and vaginal scene was very strange its almost comedic. the scene is great tho you just wonder how the fuck she ended up there.


Theres certainly better animators out there but not many filling this nieche and this has probably been Wildeers best work so far. A bit of faith is restored and im looking forward to p5 more than i did towards p4 after seeing how p3 turned out.
My guy. How could this video "kill your boner at times"? You're jacking off too often :KEK:
Also the word "comedic" is a stretch larger than Lara's asshole.
 

EdGuy69

Member
Jun 28, 2022
228
538
I genuinely had a good chuckle at her being completely tied to the wall out of nowhere. theres no way she got into that position on her own
Fair enough. I didn't pay much attention to the coomer sorcery. Had to check to see wth you're talking about, lmao.
 

Icekatana

Active Member
Jul 9, 2017
530
1,980
Say what you will about Wildeer, but his work is clearly, indubitably better than "average" and also undoubtedly better than "isn't much above average." Dude is an upper echelon content creator - who has his faults on multiple levels, sure - but questioning the quality of the content output itself is absolutely absurd. My guess is Icekatana faps to the same top 15 to 20 NSFW 3D content creators as the rest of us, and so their perception of the actual quality of work across this so-called industry in its entirety is wildly skewed. Which still isn't an excuse.

I mean, what the fuck are we doing here?

Also, the time it takes between animations isn't even relevant. You can say someone is fast at good animations, but taking a long time between good animations doesn't change the fact that those animations are, you know, good.

All that being said... it's definitely bogus how long it takes Wildeer to create these (admittedly banger) videos. Bordering on suspicious for sure. No doubt about that.
I assure you, it is not absurd. I'm also not comfortable with you guessing what I fap to.

Samus popcorn (finalizer14).gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BitterLollipop
4.60 star(s) 15 Votes