Quite honestly I do not comprehend how Animo is even compared in the slightest from a quality standpoint. Wildeer takes ages to complete anything but that is not what I am commenting on. I have checked Animos content but honestly it all looks like stuff done over 10 years ago. Just not worth a download, and don't get me started on quantity over quality.
Well, I guess you don't have professional linguistics knowledge. Undoubtedly means "without doubt", you can check any online dictionary. You don't need professional knowledge of something to lack doubts, often you will find that people lack doubts in many different scenarios that have nothing to do with professional formation. So, to your comment, I agree that I don't have proefssional knowledge on 3D animations, I can very well have a personal opinion on the matter which, as far as I understand the word "review" (in this occasion, means creating a critical appraisal of something) is what I just did. You will find that most professional reviewers in video games, cinema, books, etc. are not necessarily professionals in that field but have their own areas of expertise on which they ground their opinions and ideas. In this case, I am a professional sociologist specializing in sociology of videogames with published papers and so on, so I do have quite extensive knowledge on the matter. This means my review is right in any way? Not necesarily, that's the assumption of knowledge falacy, in which you clearly like to fall, so like any review mine is just my own opinion on the matter.
titties, everyone's got an ass
Can somebody translate what "professional" "professor" just wrote? I might be "misguided" again...
Tits:
Wouldnt bother about his reviews, because calling Wildeerps slowmotion loops high quality and making another review about a real animator and describing those anims as repetitive is... well, no comment.Can somebody translate what "professional" "professor" just wrote? I might be "misguided" again...
Ass4life!
LMAO found his review you refering to. Thats really funny
Is NOT an erogenous zone? You're doing it wrong. This isn't a war that can be won. Let's just agree that both T and A are awesome.Tits:
Ass:
- Sustain life
- Milk dispensers
- Don't need to sneak glances at them to see them, they are constantly in your peripheral view when talking to a girl
- Not everyone can have perfect tits or tits that just look good in general
- Is an errogenous zone
- Only shits and farts come out it
- You need to wait for a girl to be turned around to see them completely
- Anyone can get an ass that looks good, all it takes is doing some squats
- Is NOT an errogenous zone
So clearly tits are quantifiably better then ass.
Tell it to the cancerous woke mob.
