if he did that we would have already an update on day 20, so I´m glad i´m waiting 5 months to have a very good update than a buggy one
Right ...
But there usually is a limit for most users.
Compare it to for instance the AAA title Cyberpunk 2077 where the update 1.5 was a step in the right direction but by many considered too little and way too late.
Exceptions are few and far between.
Examples are X4 or No Man's Sky which both turned out good after bad launches. Both after extensive updates with extensive waiting times.
For things like this game, an update usually brings new content to an early access title. So it is way more lenient in that regard.
But still the longer the waiting time the less inclined the users to still stick around when the update drops.
A dev can vastly extend that time by keeping the users in the loop about what happens.
What I'm saying is yes good updates take time, but there is a threshold for the length an update can take before users on mass turn away from a product.
Regardless of when the update drops and what it's contents are expect the usual "I waited X month for
this?" whines pop up here.