- Dec 22, 2017
- 902
- 895
The Size is only because its the "Full" Game with all Content that is so far released
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,550
Not really. The update is very shot.
Not bad but short.
I'd wait for more updates. So maybe come back in a year or so...
- Sep 28, 2021
- 1,608
- 1,557
It's an adequate word. Devs usually have a vision for how the game should be, which may or may not include something againsts patreon's tos. Sadly they have to abandon that vision and release censored stuff.
It is silly that fiction is so heavily regulated.
The truth is the only person who knows if those characters will have scenes is BD himself. It's mind-blowing to see so many people in this thread who think he would publicly say he's going to break Patreon's rules.
Especially since most of them are quoting an interview he did where he mentions they would only have scenes if an "evil modder" put them in. It's like they think BD doesn't know what that really means and who's "modding" all those other games when a lot of the games from other devs he's promoted in the past had incest as one of the main themes...
So in the end, it's all up to BD what he plans to do or not to do with those characters because he's obviously going to deny anything that could put his Patreon page at risk when discussing the game. Especially when that's how some other devs have gotten in trouble with Patreon in the past.
Unfortunately, with how slow the game has been progressing in the past two years we might never find out anyway...
Last edited:
I don't think romancing both Harper and Natalie will violate patreons tos. Since romancing both Jamie and Elizabeth doesn't. He should be fine as long as he doesn't do anything sexual with both at the same time.
- Nov 29, 2020
- 139
- 216
Nah that is wrong he said that Stuff which is NOT YET in the Game will be censored in the DITLO Stuff.
In this case Harpers Nudes. Harper will be romanceable/Nude later on.
What the hell is DITLO?
- Nov 6, 2017
- 770
- 1,260
You are better off not knowing... for real this game is such a shitshow now.
Well took almost a year for 300 something renders, so maybe one year is not enoughI'd wait for more updates. So maybe come back in a year or so...
whens the next update? With the rest of the renders
- May 19, 2018
- 104
- 647
Probably not gonna happen, I give this one 6-8 months before the abandoned tag.
- Jan 4, 2020
- 1,693
- 2,305
- Mar 28, 2017
- 12,304
- 16,919
- Nov 18, 2017
- 1,035
- 2,369
Agreed. Nice to see more and more people bring it up.
Had a bunch raging followers bitch at me when I mentioned it a while back.
- Mar 28, 2017
- 12,304
- 16,919
You are way too generous to left him keep the right one.
- Oct 23, 2016
- 4,519
- 13,533
Honestly, I'm tired of people rolling out the "it's Patreon's fault excuse."
Patreon's rules were a problem for devs for like the first two months after they started implementing them.
Yes, there was a second sweep where they went after some of the less intelligent approaches, but apart from that tons of successful games have worked their way around the Patreon rules for years.
Patches by evil modders, setting your relationships in game, extra-editions released on other sites etc..
The games who actually changed their content and/or have no patches have no real excuse, apart from either laziness or not giving a fuck.
There was content Braindrop clearly hinted at, then never delivered on, his white knights bend themselves backwards 180° degrees to claim it was never intended to be in the game, while the rest of us are laughing our asses off, over these silly attempts at deflection.
This isn't directed at you personally, it was just the latest post reminding me of that tired defence.
And honestly, it is just one of many reasons to be disappointed with this game, the teasing, the speed of progress both in story and game development, the weak writing, the story, the godforsaken duck faces all girls have, including some so extreme it borders on deformities.
I'm just glad that people finally seem to wake up to things being wrong with WVM.