i am waiting for free version..if not...good luck milking people of money
- Thread starter Liturgy
- Start date
I think creating your own engine can set you up for disappointment. You are aware of how much extra effort went into it, but the players are just here for the content. And new engines are usually buggier than existing ones, so probably you must continue to work on improving the engine instead of building content.
I do respect the effort though. It is a cool engine and I thought it worked surprisingly well. It was nice being able to hold ctrl to skip text like a renpy game. The texting interface was interesting. I am glad to see someone trying new things instead of just delivering another poorly designed twine game. I do hope you continue your efforts as I can see this becoming a solid game once there is more to it.
Just right now is closer to demo in terms of what is available. And it is disappointing to play demo and get message "you must pay to experience properly." At this stage in game lifespan, intention should be to impress players so once they are finished with available content, they may pay to support you creating more. Once you have a solid base game, maybe then you pivot to "subscriber only" events, as players can enjoy what is available then decide to pay for extra.
I think I'll have to wait for someone to share the code or for the content to be released in the next version, nothing against it, the game has everything to be perfect but the locked content discourages many players.
- Oct 8, 2018
- 602
- 1,257
Checking if the code isn't "Normal Supporter" and if so then showing the "Wrong code" popup is certainly a choice. Though I do recommend the initial flash in of the logo to be toned down as, well, flashing in white on a dark screen is kinda not good.
Anyways
JavaScript:
game.premium = true
- May 28, 2018
- 442
- 467
- Oct 8, 2018
- 602
- 1,257