- Jun 10, 2018
- 6,263
- 22,263
LOOOL, wait let me check that... Yep, fits perfectlyLOOOOOOOOL HI SILVER.
But seriously, his registration date is kind of a hint.
LOOOL, wait let me check that... Yep, fits perfectlyLOOOOOOOOL HI SILVER.
But seriously, his registration date is kind of a hint.
Yeesh, oops. I'll delete that image. But I did find some outfits looking similar to Ashley's in game. I won't post any more images just to be safe. But I searched "college uniform"Unfortunately, the kids in this pic are high schoolers, not university students. In Australia, “secondary college” is just our fancy way of saying high school. So these three are probably 16-17 year olds.
First i had doubts! now after recheck it, i'm sure of it hahaLOOOL, wait let me check that... Yep, fits perfectly
I am not being funny butYeesh, oops. I'll delete that image. But I did find some outfits looking similar to Ashley's in game. I won't post any more images just to be safe. But I searched "college uniform"
Ashley is in college. The top is her school clothes. The bottom is a "slutty schoolgirl" outfit. Every character has multiple outfits, and the bottom one is just for sex.I am not being funny but
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
She seems like a school girl to me in those two pictures.
Well you could always say that these outfits are stylized anime outfits, which isn't even far away from the truth.Ashley is in college. The top is her school clothes. The bottom is a "slutty schoolgirl" outfit. Every character has multiple outfits, and the bottom one is just for sex.
I do have Honey Select and it is not me that you have to convince. I do care either way, but I am not Patreon.Ashley is in college. The top is her school clothes. The bottom is a "slutty schoolgirl" outfit. Every character has multiple outfits, and the bottom one is just for sex.
omg i'm gonna miss ashley for that, but in future will you keep using renp'y or you gonna change your system like VN maker by enterbrain since he easyly rummage your contents and change it to their own if i were you i will change the system to better one, the one that can support better encryption and protection against hijackersRe modelling Ashley will not be possible for me. There's just way too much CGs in the game, it would take me a whole month or two to do. The easiest solution (if Patreon does say all sexual content with Ashley needs to be out of the game) would be to skip over all sexual content with Ashley, but keep her story.
A full engine transfer would be even harder, haha.omg i'm gonna miss ashley for that, but in future will you keep using renp'y or you gonna change your system like VN maker by enterbrain since he easyly rummage your contents and change it to their own if i were you i will change the system to better one, the one that can support better encryption and protection against hijackers
You must be registered to see the links
what you never heard of youtube? lolSo they just ban people randomly based of random reports not bothering to check if reports are true or false? Do you know if this ever happened in practice(someone getting falsely and permanently banned based of false report/s)?
I would have agreed with you until giochi deliberately falsely report Runey, if you know anything about Patreon then you would know that Patreon had engaged in bans of creators in the past for no-seemingly legal reason other than an arbitrary virtue signaling guidelines. But that's ok, site dictates their own rule even if the rules are retarded.all I said was some making too much fuss about it which I believe to be true and then made some points which I am not sure if you got.
Patreon == Youtube? Based On what standards?what you never heard of youtube? lol
This is just not true. Youtube is using a mix of things, not just AI. Patreon is not comparable in size to likes of youtube and facebook, neither by amount of content nor number of creators nor number of regular users and certainly not by number of reports it gets. I don't agree with this mentality of "guilty unless proven otherwise" or "guilty by association", seems some of you are trying to fight this injustice that started happening to some yet you align yourself with the same type of mentality that caused the injustice in the first place. I've just checked Patreons TOS, seems they say they review reports manually. So are they directly lying? Considering all variables at hand I think that is unlikely and I think they do in fact review content manually.I would have agreed with you until giochi deliberately falsely report Runey, if you know anything about Patreon then you would know that Patreon had engaged in bans of creators in the past for no-seemingly legal reason other than an arbitrary virtue signaling guidelines. But that's ok, site dictates their own rule even if the rules are retarded.
Also, no tech companies manually verify contents anymore, not Youtube, not Tumblr, not Kickstarter certainly not Patreon cus they don't pull the massive amount of money as others do. Still, Patreon has tens of thousands of creators that are active every day putting out new content, any sane San Francisco tech company would do what Mountain View or San Jose companies would do, give all that work to algorithms instead of hiring hundreds if not thousands of workers. I'm not sure if this is deliberate naivety or just naivety.
You're right, I will likely not get banned. They specifically told me to "remove this type content from your page" and "Content glorifying sexual violence cannot be funded by or linked to or from your creator page in any way." (Not sure if this part is the automated part, because there's also no sexual violence).Patreon == Youtube? Based On what standards?
This is just not true. Youtube is using a mix of things, not just AI. Patreon is not comparable in size to likes of youtube and facebook, neither by amount of content nor number of creators nor number of regular users and certainly not by number of reports it gets. I don't agree with this mentality of "guilty unless proven otherwise" or "guilty by association", seems some of you are trying to fight this injustice that started happening to some yet you align yourself with the same type of mentality that caused the injustice in the first place. I've just checked Patreons TOS, seems they say they review reports manually. So are they directly lying? Considering all variables at hand I think that is unlikely and I think they do in fact review content manually.
If Runey has a disclaimer in his game that all characters are 18+ and context of the game supports this and that is how they actually look like regardless of type of school uniform, then I think he has nothing to worry about. I can agree they you can never know with site that has "Trust and Safety Team", I guess we will see what happens. If Runey does get banned for this or gets forced to change the content, it would definitely set a new precedent for Patreon and not a good one, still I believe Runey will not get banned.
YouTuber Law did a pretty good vulgarization of that subject. And the case of the ban of Sargon.This happens with too many companies... Take Roblox for instance: Pewdiepie is banned there because he is unwanted.
Reality is that ToS is more of a guideline to grant you more chances to stay in that platform but if they decide they do not want you there, you could even be a saint with kitten posters but they would ban you regardless with no questions asked.
I've been thinking about it recently, and I think Patreon takes too little of our money.This happens with too many companies... Take Roblox for instance: Pewdiepie is banned there because he is unwanted.
Reality is that ToS is more of a guideline to grant you more chances to stay in that platform but if they decide they do not want you there, you could even be a saint with kitten posters but they would ban you regardless with no questions asked.