Cartageno

Devoted Member
Dec 1, 2019
8,903
15,028
No, not really. Total ascent for a flight from New York to Cape Town is about the same height as a flight from New York to Chicago -- about 11 km. The extra fuel load for the flight to Cape Town is significant, but the extra fuel burned to reach your cruising height is not. And that is the point the MC is focused on -- fuel to ascent.

Could the MC just be wrong and confidently misinforming Cait? Sure! But, since I'm playing him, he's not. Or if he is, I'll be very disappointed. He's not a teen and has been through higher education.

It's sort of like when he's describing baking powder to Rae. He didn't know what baking powder was (starch and baking soda FWIW) but... just read the effing label.
Probably an issue with which side of the pond you are on but when I said "short domestic hop" I didn't mean NY-Chicago but Paris-Lyon, London-Manchester, Hamburg-Berlin, where you do not reach full travel height.

And since we're both picking nits: yes, the extra fuel for the ascent of a longer flight does not really matter but it is there and the statement as such stays correct ;) But as I said that certainly is not what was meant. MC isn't a flight engineer and him getting facts and/or terms wrong should not be that surprising.

I mean in a way I know how you feel, I had it in a different game myself and decided to do a fake outrage post over there. These things may happen in movies too, and when you see it you can't unsee it. And while it doesn't really matter for the story as a whole there is a certain amount of disappointment when a dev starts getting technical and then getting it wrong.

That being said, by applying Occam's razor I would still argue that it is more likely that this is a mistake by the dev and/or the MC instead of a subtle hint of the state of Earth technology to be used to assess later story elements by.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Master of Puppets

sillyrobot

Engaged Member
Apr 22, 2019
2,254
1,963
Probably an issue with which side of the pond you are on but when I said "short domestic hop" I didn't mean NY-Chicago but Paris-Lyon, London-Manchester, Hamburg-Berlin, where you do not reach full travel height.

And since we're both picking nits: yes, the extra fuel for the ascent of a longer flight does not really matter but it is there and the statement as such stays correct ;) But as I said that certainly is not what was meant. MC isn't a flight engineer and him getting facts and/or terms wrong should not be that surprising.

I mean in a way I know how you feel, I had it in a different game myself and decided to do a fake outrage post over there. These things may happen in movies too, and when you see it you can't unsee it. And while it doesn't really matter for the story as a whole there is a certain amount of disappointment when a dev starts getting technical and then getting it wrong.

That being said, by applying Occam's razor I would still argue that it is more likely that this is a mistake by the dev and/or the MC instead of a subtle hint of the state of Earth technology to be used to assess later story elements by.
Probably, but I can hope. I simply sat back and went. "Hmm, the determining factor is ascent fuel. What mode of transport could he be describing since the dev was deliberately vague by skipping everything but that final line. Obviously, air+. Balloons, helicopters, and commercial planes all fail to fit the basics. Sub-orbital hops fit. Orbital starts to fail again and interplanetary fails because the fuel (for us) becomes highly non-linear and "we" don't go anywhere, we send sensor probes."

Sub-orbital hops gets talked about every ~20 years or so when the new generation discovers them and thinks they're cool because well, they're a cool thought exercise.

Do I think it'll ever matter? No.
 

whichone

Forum Fanatic
Jan 3, 2018
4,915
10,328
MC: "Remember, the further you go, the more fuel you need, the more fuel you burn on ascent."

The only transport that fits is ballisic re-rentry.
Isn't re-entry a form of descent, not ascent?
We travel down to a planet's surface from space, not up.

Regardless, MC is not an astronaut. Perhaps he just used layman's terms to describe something complex to someone who knows less than he does.
Cait has probably never even seen an aeroplane, never mind understand how space travel works (which I also doubt MC understands the intricacies of).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Master of Puppets

sillyrobot

Engaged Member
Apr 22, 2019
2,254
1,963
Isn't re-entry a form of descent, not ascent?
We travel down to a planet's surface, not up.

Regardless, MC is not an astronaut. Perhaps he just used layman's terms to describe something complex to someone who knows less than he does.
Cait has probably never even seen an aeroplane, never mind understand how space travel works (which I also doubt MC understands the intricacies of).
Descent typically takes almost no fuel. The fuel is spent going up.

Cait almost certainly hasn't seen anything other than drawings of flying sail ships.
 

sillyrobot

Engaged Member
Apr 22, 2019
2,254
1,963
Exactly.
So "ballistic re-entry" (descent) doesn't seem to fit at all, when he's specifically talking about "ascent", along with fuel costs of the journey.

Have to ask, how are you determining this?
AFAIK, the only craft to successfully land on Venus were the USSR's Venera (7-14) & Vega (1 & 2).
NASA have only done fly-bys & orbiters, to the best of my knowledge.
I don't believe that the USSR shared information about anything, never mind how much fuel they used.
Sub-orbital re-entry pretty much assumes going up because it isn't a stable position to hold.

Venera 7 was launched by a Molniya 8K78M with thrusts of 220,000 lbs x 120 seconds, 220,000 lbs x 320 seconds, 65,000 lbs x 330 seconds, and 14,000 lbs x 340 seconds.

Voyager 2 was launched with a Titan-Centaur. This rocket has thrusts of 500,000x150 seconds, 100,000 x 200 seconds, and 15,000 lbs x 470 seconds, and 15,000 lbs x 42 seconds.
 

sillyrobot

Engaged Member
Apr 22, 2019
2,254
1,963
I simply asked how you knew how much fuel it used, as the USSR didn't release much info back then, if any.
You've given me rocket specs, which tells me nothing of how much fuel they actually used.
Do you not know?
Voyager 2 left Earth with 104kg of hydrazine, I have no idea how much fuel any of the Venera lander craft carried.

Ballistic re-entry uses drag, to slow the descent pulled by gravity.
I do not see how\why anyone would assume they were "going up".
Particularly not when assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.
Using assumption as a basis for anything in space exploration seems pretty crazy.
*eye roll* The type of fuel isn't anywhere near as important as thrust-seconds, but if you really want to know, all four stages used LOX/Kerosene totaling ~150 T of propellant.
 

WindIsHowling

Active Member
Aug 5, 2017
579
649
Downloading the Win compressed version from any source stops at about 140mb for some reason... I've never seen anything like it, is the file corrupted? (Also, downloaded another game from a shared source to check, not my disk or anything that's full)
 
Oct 10, 2019
363
459
I did not expect to find a discussion about rocket science here of all places.
Anyway since I had to restart the game because of loosing my saves I had the opportunity to revisit many parts of the game I did not remember as well before, so I just wanted to share my opinions about some things,
the game in general is really good, I cannot call it perfect, because nothing can really be, but it is definitely well made, it has a compelling narrative and relatively likeable characters, they have personality and are mostly coherent to those, they have motivations and goals and fit thogheter well, now as for some more detailed descriptions I should probably put them in a spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 

Laar

New Member
Jul 17, 2019
3
0
I ran into a problem after editing the save files on the mobile version of the game,i can't pick the yes option on the "this save was created on a different device" prompt
 

Master of Puppets

Conversation Conqueror
Oct 5, 2017
7,599
10,167
I dont have a problem with harlots, but all story with this one annoying as fuck. After MC and Liryel went to her world, all arc with her reunion with aunt was pure dissapointment. Aunt was made instantly from brothel whore to badass woman (made those 3 who degraded her like piece of shit, suffer in the dungeon thinking that their were responsible for niece disappearence). She was responsible for her niece almost being gangraped because of her lifestyle which lead to this situation and she didnt even felt sorry or bad about it, just worried where Liryel was. No sorry, no remorse, nothing.

And then main part, I know that MC is stranger for her, but trying to threat/intimidate man who have outstanding magical abillities and who saved her niece from death/gangrape or all at once? And he kept niece safe and good for a long time after. Where was MC self respect during cellar threatening and questioning incident? Why didnt he confronted this arrogant attitude from a prostitute who were responsible for this mess from the start? He was silently listening to her threat attempts and general daring to presure man who fixed her total fuckup. Oh, and one more thing, as a man who had experience with prostitutes, I can tell that harlot-badass woman charachter even more "fantasy" then magic itself)
  • She was never a whore, so there was no transformation. In her first appearance she was a clearly powerful woman having fun with a bunch of dumb himbos.
  • Why would she think her "lifestyle" had anything to do with Lyriel's disappearance after she was done with interrogating the three dipshits and finding out that they had nothing to do with it?
  • She doesn't know that the MC saved her from death, when he met her he was an absolute moron and didn't tell her, refused to give her a straight answer on anything. All she knows is that this mysterious magician kidnapped Lyriel and is refusing to explain himself. This is the problem that I have with her events, that the normally smart and levelheaded MC turns into a total macho moron for no apparent reason.
  • You think that it's a problem having a strong female character in a game with Rae and Naomi? Riiiiight...
 

Dxdxs

Member
Jan 11, 2023
131
115
  • She was never a whore, so there was no transformation. In her first appearance she was a clearly powerful woman having fun with a bunch of dumb himbos.
  • Why would she think her "lifestyle" had anything to do with Lyriel's disappearance after she was done with interrogating the three dipshits and finding out that they had nothing to do with it?
  • She doesn't know that the MC saved her from death, when he met her he was an absolute moron and didn't tell her, refused to give her a straight answer on anything. All she knows is that this mysterious magician kidnapped Lyriel and is refusing to explain himself. This is the problem that I have with her events, that the normally smart and levelheaded MC turns into a total macho moron for no apparent reason.
  • You think that it's a problem having a strong female character in a game with Rae and Naomi? Riiiiight...
Attacking the person as your counter argument is not cool at all, and it doesn't make your point any stronger, on the contrary. Finally, it just makes you look like a dumbass.
 

drifter139

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2019
1,952
1,959
  • She was never a whore, so there was no transformation. In her first appearance she was a clearly powerful woman having fun with a bunch of dumb himbos.
  • Why would she think her "lifestyle" had anything to do with Lyriel's disappearance after she was done with interrogating the three dipshits and finding out that they had nothing to do with it?
  • She doesn't know that the MC saved her from death, when he met her he was an absolute moron and didn't tell her, refused to give her a straight answer on anything. All she knows is that this mysterious magician kidnapped Lyriel and is refusing to explain himself. This is the problem that I have with her events, that the normally smart and levelheaded MC turns into a total macho moron for no apparent reason.
  • You think that it's a problem having a strong female character in a game with Rae and Naomi? Riiiiight...
I wanna offer some advice: do NOT feed the trolls
 
4.70 star(s) 343 Votes