Hmm .... this dialogue don't match .. think of it this way even in faithful path, Ana doubt her husband as of now And gave David an opportunity to prove his innocence. Her heart is already broken of whatever she heard from others about David. She doesn't trust David but she gave an opportunity to him to prove his innocence in front of Ana as she already saw pics. So until David provide any proof, she'll be rude. Take it this way if Alexia said that she is being approached by David to Ana, David will be untrustworthy until he prove that whatever Alexia told is wrong. In real world guys has to go through that even when they're framed for false accusations. They're being punished for the crimes they didn't do for years. That's how laws are. Guilty until proven right. Alexia bf doesn't just told Ana, he gave proof to Ana, that's how David was framed. If David give some proof besides whatever he say, he'll be faithful then.Issue I have is the dialogue to stat in the 3rd chapter. i play the keep the marriage path in all the wife corruption/ntr games first. The stats i made sure was setup at its best points to have a faithful path. heres where my problem comes in. 3 dialogue points in the chapter match the stats we choose. but 3 major ones don't.
dialogue/stats match
1. elbows Chris when he gets touchy
2. David kisses her and she at first resist but then returns the kiss
3. she threatens to tell David if Chris doesn't leave the bathroom.
dialogue/stats don't match
1. when he comes in the room to go to bed she is hostile and rude
2. texting to jake on the phone and texting while in the bed with husband
3. Dreaming of other men and being turned on by it while admitting it wasn't her husband.
These don't help believe that there is a faithful path. Due to the inconsistency of those dialogue, she doesn't talk or act like the stat setup of a wife that doesn't believe her husband possibly didn't cheat.
Just my opinion.
About Jake and other guys well it's her personal perspective about other guys beside David storyline. They're in confusing part from Ana's perspective until Ana deny them going ahead. They can/cannot be the person of interest for Ana. So that's why dialogues are that way for the time being. Just an example if I ask a gamer personally don't like Marvin, Ana will still be given an option to masturbate thinking about Marvin because of his approach towards Ana. But going ahead Ana might get an option to turn him down if she don't like Marvin.