Both statements are true... the voting cycle became more complex because we have 3 lists now.
1st List is what Chyos intends to addt to the game
2nd List is voted on Discord as in which order the Items of that list are added up to vote for Patreon
3rd List is the actual voteing list on Patreon.
For the 2nd and 3rd lists the votes are carried over so eventually even a hardly voted Option is added to the Patreon list... that's the theory, but in practice the Discord votes hardly represent the opinion of the mayority of the Patreon supporters which causes alot of friction with both the different factions and the Dev himself.
And let's not start about the voteing mess includeing the Bonus scenes.
Thank you!
This is the clear and thorough explanation of the voting system that I was looking for.
Sorry, but I will not discuss something serious when one of the arguments is disrespecting what a partner said, even if you think he is on a drunk state.
I don't want to start a flame war so this will be my
last response to you on this topic.
I feel
compelled to reply to your statement because it's a bad faith attempt to paint me as a bad actor.
First, I didn't "disrespect what a partner said" in my previous post. I merely described his explanation of the voting system as "haphazardly put-together and very confusing but well-meaning."
Which is true!
After reading
this explanation of how the voting system works, a lot of people who are completely unfamiliar with the system would be left confused and with even more questions.
Compare it with
Evangelion-01's much clearer explanation
here and it's plain as day that I'm not just "disrespecting what a partner said."
I mean, is this the standard now? If a "partner" does something poorly and then someone who isn't a "partner" says that what they did was done poorly, is that "non-partner" now "disrespecting what a partner [has done]?"
In addition, if my intent was truly to "disrespect what a partner said" then I wouldn't have commended his attempted explanation by calling it "well-meaning," now would I?
Second, you make it seem as if I'm just assuming that he's drunk from completely out-of-the-blue.
But that's not the case!
The reason I called him a "drunk poster" is because he himself
literally admitted to being drunk in this
post.
When you openly admit that you're currently drunk and then someone else, in response, says that you're drunk, is that someone else insulting you? Is that someone else now "disrespecting" you?
In addition:
If you are drunk while dancing, are you not a "drunk dancer?"
If you are drunk while driving, are you not a "drunk driver?"
And if you are drunk while posting, are you not a "drunk poster?"
In the end, I really go out of my way to treat people online with respect - even when they really don't deserve it.
So I don't take kindly to people making false accusations of me doing the opposite.
Now with that in mind, I have nothing more to say about the topic.
Have a nice day.
