CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

Fan Art A Wife And Mother Fan Art

4.60 star(s) 11 Votes
Oct 9, 2023
76
338
These are simply stunning. This technology is going to revolutionize everything, in 5 to 10 years anyone with a quality system and the skill will be able to create a full game or even a movie in their own home. Actors, celebrities, studios and production companies will slowly lose importance as this continues to improve. I think that we will have a different completed AI version of AWAM before L+P can even finish his 10-15 year project.
 

tubitvdishi2

Member
Apr 10, 2021
425
3,546
can u share ur pc specs? btw i got rtx 3050 ti 4gb am i able to run this ?
Cant run SD on my potato PC... im using RUNDIFFUSION to run Comfyui through Pinokio with controlnet and IP-Adapter for Sofia face and style. For checkpoint: I am using Juggernaut XL.

Rundiffusion:

I will be upgrading to 8gb GPU laptop during Christmas sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xyz30032004

Oliver Wendell Homely

Active Member
May 9, 2020
679
2,474
These are simply stunning. This technology is going to revolutionize everything, in 5 to 10 years anyone with a quality system and the skill will be able to create a full game or even a movie in their own home. Actors, celebrities, studios and production companies will slowly lose importance as this continues to improve. I think that we will have a different completed AI version of AWAM before L+P can even finish his 10-15 year project.
The 1981 Michael Crichton movie "Looker" was actually prescient. If you haven't seen it, check it out. The looker "gun" technology in the film is still not real, I don't think, but the core idea of the movie is very plausible, even if the technology behind the story didn't develop as the movie shows.
 
Oct 9, 2023
76
338
The problem with private parts is that -- The new model FLUX is not really good at it, and if i use a LORA for nudity then i am risking the change in her facial feature too. :unsure:
Is there a model that creates actual sex yet? I've seen nudity and some shots with celebs showing them covered in cum but no BJ, sex etc. Is the AI not programmed yet for actual sexual situations?
 

tubitvdishi2

Member
Apr 10, 2021
425
3,546
Is there a model that creates actual sex yet? I've seen nudity and some shots with celebs showing them covered in cum but no BJ, sex etc. Is the AI not programmed yet for actual sexual situations?
As far as I know, if you're using a specific character model/Lora or just swapping face with insightface model... then it's actually difficult. If you want random characters to be put through sexual/nude ideas then that could be done.....
 

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
208
613
With all of its faults. It gets the lighting correct every damn time.... Flux is still improving - give it one more year and it'll be awesome.
I respectively disagree.
All I can see is overdone rim light and highlights as they always look flashy and overall tonal changes based on the background tone. No bounce light, no tonal variation dependant on temperature, no light diffusion.
Everything is oversaturated and without any variation in saturation.


Here is an example. On top of obvious anatomical problems like her butcheek muscle reaching middle of her leg, you have plastic skin and for some reason warm shadow colours in the middle of the night.
The highlights are overdone so she looks like she is all greasy and you should only have warm tones in the close proximity to the warm light sources. These should then shift into cool tones as the distance increases. Also not enough shadow for such weak light sources. Like I said looks like a simple ochre filter was applied to the whole thing.
Also, no highlights whatsoever on the most reflective thing in the picture - water.
I can go on, but it looks flashy so most people will not even notice.

1728474331804.png
 

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
I respectively disagree.
All I can see is overdone rim light and highlights as they always look flashy and overall tonal changes based on the background tone. No bounce light, no tonal variation dependant on temperature, no light diffusion.
Everything is oversaturated and without any variation in saturation.


Here is an example. On top of obvious anatomical problems like her butcheek muscle reaching middle of her leg, you have plastic skin and for some reason warm shadow colours in the middle of the night.
The highlights are overdone so she looks like she is all greasy and you should only have warm tones in the close proximity to the warm light sources. These should then shift into cool tones as the distance increases. Also not enough shadow for such weak light sources. Like I said looks like a simple ochre filter was applied to the whole thing.
Also, no highlights whatsoever on the most reflective thing in the picture - water.
I can go on, but it looks flashy so most people will not even notice.

View attachment 4114661
lmao speaking like someone who knows 0 about the subject.

You do realize there are different loras, checkpoints, styletransfers, embedding, hypernetoworks, loras, controlnets, VAEs, DoRAs, diffusion models, ipadapters, upscalers and first of all the possibility for endless prompting, right?

On top of that you have like 5 good base models in which you can work on and that have been exponentially getting better.

Dude sees an image probably done with a simple prompt on top of rundiffusion which isnt even a local stable diffusion where you have endless possibilities and is like "yeah AI Art is bad, despite these images being better than 99% of the renders in this thread and infinitely better than the monstruosity I have on my avatar that I call art".

Seriously? :KEK:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mars88 and p_l_a
4.60 star(s) 11 Votes