I always welcome a candid review of my work as it lends perspective from the audience. I do prefer being referred to as Jack instead of bro, however.
It is true that this story is ahead of its time for this genre. One might say avant-garde. I'm sure that you noted that the first two scenes were set rigidly in the AWAM world with the introduction of the first crossover characters. However, as the story progressed the crossover element creates a creature of its own anchored in a form of originality that probably could not be realized any other way. The story is also presented more like the movie "Sin City" telling multiple sub-plots at once rather than "Beverly Hills Cop" where Eddie Murphy appears in every scene. The distinction between the two movies speaks well to your point. If one enters the theatre expecting a fast-talking Murphy in "Sin City" many would find themselves culture shocked. Those with the Murphy expectation would not return for "Sin City II". I respect the varieties of tastes and expectations found in the audience. However, I am confident that you have not read my work in its entirety, and your opinion is based on a snippet of my presentation. I challenge you to read it all (not a hard thing, really), and return with your revised review. I would be more willing to receive your opines then.
In either case, I thank you for taking the time to speak to me. Oh! and by the way...which male character would you like to see with Sophia? Jack.
