VN Ren'Py A Wife and Mother [P2 v0.225 + P1 v0.152] [Lust & Passion]

3.20 star(s) 560 Votes
Discussion Reviews (560)
tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
OZtheW1ZARD said:
Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
Click to expand...
I found your calculation formula. So I deleted my post.

OZtheW1ZARD said:
Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
Click to expand...
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.

Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.

So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
 
OZtheW1ZARD

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
223
737
208
tofhdns said:
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.

Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.

So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
Click to expand...
No, calculation is correct. Year on year % difference in the render count.
Also the graph confirms it.

1718967213905.png

Feel free to share your findings together with methodology if you disagree.
 
S

sphynks80

Member
Dec 9, 2017
200
362
243
I have noticed a trend in the Anglo-Saxon world to count, for example, the number of words contained in a text, or as in this case, the number of renders contained in an upgrade. This attention to a purely quantitative aspect is funny for someone who does not belong to your culture. But if the quality is high, how many renders are included in an upgrade, what does it matter? Well, the world is beautiful because it is varied...
 
  • Yay, update!
Reactions: 1879
hmc15

hmc15

Active Member
Apr 4, 2019
608
1,108
331
alicesp said:
The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
Click to expand...
Simultaneously the boys have become literal men.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: alicesp
tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
OZtheW1ZARD said:
You know it is. Why are you asking?
You know it is the same as 1646/100=1883/X right?)
Click to expand...
This is the relative ratio you calculated.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100"
And the result is 12.58%.

This is the decline rate I calculated.
"=(1646-1883)/1646*100"
And the result is 14.39%.

And I included 760 in the above calculation (for your benefit), but again, that is a January 2024 figure so it should not be included in the above calculation.
 
palmtrees89

palmtrees89

Engaged Member
Jul 3, 2021
2,227
14,075
637
OZtheW1ZARD said:
Go argue with the person who provided the numbers.
Click to expand...
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);

2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022

Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;

2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022

Now you guys can continue ... :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: RCC14, tofhdns and OZtheW1ZARD
OZtheW1ZARD

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
223
737
208
palmtrees89 said:
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);

2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022

Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;

2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022

Now you guys can continue ... :p
Click to expand...
Thanks :) I know, right? :D

To be honest I wasn't sure about including those 700ish renders in 2023, but since these were allegedly done in 2023 and only came out in 2024 because of some rework or something, and you have included them yourself, I decided to follow your numbers (y)
 
A

Anteron

Engaged Member
Jun 17, 2023
3,741
4,289
396
alicesp said:
The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
Click to expand...
Or she'll have disappeared, as not born yet.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1879 and alicesp
H

hzjujk

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2020
1,914
8,208
678
Scarlet56 said:
When AWAM is over, some of us may be.....dead.
Others will have changed their mentality, will have made a life for themselves.
Those who will be lucky enough to see AWAM completed have not yet been born.
Sad truth.
Click to expand...
Your bad luck! L&P and I plan to live forever!
Poor mortal!
Yes, yes, not everyone is blessed and has to post their misfortune here in this thread.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: ClubbaWang, Kickjaw65 and nexer
OZtheW1ZARD

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
223
737
208
tofhdns said:
This is the relative ratio you calculated.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100"
And the result is 12.58%.

This is the decline rate I calculated.
"=(1646-1883)/1646*100"
And the result is 14.39%.
Click to expand...
On a side note and this is not an attack.

Why did you decide to calculate decline rate for a pair of values? I understand doing this for all the years combined, but even then you are examining just the decline rate and not the actual decline value?

What I have done is to calculate by what % the following year changed in comparison to the previous one.
 
S

S.t.s

Member
Mar 4, 2018
355
352
248
Please someone help, in the Christian and Dylan scene, when Ellie comes down the stairs, goes back up and doesn't look at them, what should I have done in the past?
 
tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
OZtheW1ZARD said:
On a side note and this is not an attack.

Why did you decide to calculate decline rate for a pair of values? I understand doing this for all the years combined, but even then you are examining just the decline rate and not the actual decline value?

What I have done is to calculate by what % the following year changed in comparison to the previous one.
Click to expand...
Literally, it is to see the rate of decline by year.
(From the beginning of the debate, the main point was that “L&P’s workload is decreasing.”)

palmtrees89 calculated with the same formula before I published mine.
This means that this formula fits this situation.

This is the formula I used:
The value of "=(100-80)/100*100" is 20%.
I can present this and explain to people that it's a 20% decrease.

This is the formula you used:
The value of "=(100/80*100)-100" is 25%.
How would you explain this to people?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OZtheW1ZARD
OZtheW1ZARD

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
223
737
208
tofhdns said:
Literally, it is to see the rate of decline by year.
(From the beginning of the debate, the main point was that “L&P’s workload is decreasing.”)

palmtrees89 calculated with the same formula before I published mine.
This means that this formula is universal.

This is the formula I used:
The value of "=(100-80)/100*100" is 20%.
I can present this and explain to people that it's a 20% decrease.

This is the formula you used.
The value of "=(100/80*100)-100" is 25%.
How would you explain this to people?
Click to expand...
but applying it for just one year gives you very inaccurate value, plus it measures what is the rate of change and not the value of the rate itself. This is a bit like acceleration and speed in Physics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevensteve00
tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
OZtheW1ZARD said:
but applying it for just one year gives you very inaccurate value, plus it measures what is the rate of change and not the value of the rate itself. This is a bit like acceleration and speed in Physics.
Click to expand...
It decreased from 100 to 80, and the decrease is 20%.
Very simple.

If you calculate with your formula you get 25%.
Again, to claim your formula you need to be able to explain 25%.

If you fail to explain this, your formula is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
3.20 star(s) 560 Votes