- Mar 1, 2019
- 525
- 4,427
I respect your right to keep proprietary information to yourself, and I would never ask you to release your e-mails. That would be inappropriate. All I am asking for is two pieces of information: from who and when. Thank you for confirming that it was L&P although the time frame remains a mystery.I have published this list here before. And also then I mentioned that I received it from him by mail. And of course I will not reveal my mails or my knowledge here in this forum. The forum used to be interesting and it was cool to exchange info. But since a few months there are almost only haters, morons, know-it-alls, who think they know everything about AWAM and L&P and tell the same crap day in, day out. So I read through this with a grin and think to myself... wtf!![]()
I think that this forum is still interesting, however, what I am seeing is a lack of critical thinking in some (only some) of the members. This is why I am asking for the two pieces of critical information. It is the method of discussion I am driving for not a castigation of any individuals.
You are right to question the environment, because when we abandon the steps of critical thinking the discussion devolves into an emotional or irrational discussion. When this happens the impression we get from the dialogue is anger, ill thought out discourse and pontification. I for one have a lot to learn from those who are closer to the source than I am. This is precisely why I am now asking for source evidence to cut through the irrelevancies you describe when we dialogue without it.
This is why I am asking again...are you willing to share when this information was received?