You sound like a pastor speaking from the pulpit to his congregation or to his flock of sheep.
![Wink ;) ;)]()
What
Dr.Fapalot is trying to tell you is that L&P should be open to constructive criticism. And I mean really constructive. That kind of criticism is incredibly important to everyone. And if you think that
Dr.Fapalot is not supportive of him in what he is doing, you are also wrong. He has been a legend for a long time!
We need to be able to express our thoughts about the game in the form of criticism or ideas, don't we? I share his ideas/story for the most part, but every now and then we have different opinions. But that's not important. It's about the conversation about it. And if L&P sticks to his story...time will tell if he was right or not.
Believe me, my friend, I understand you, and moreover, I agree to some extent with the criticism that is being expressed against L&P. I know that the doctor supports L&P and it certainly deserves respect.
But I am paying attention to the reaction of the community to L&P's managerial mistakes in determining the timing of the project, I am trying to focus the attention of society on the fact that the reaction was as critical and uncompromising as possible! He was called a liar and many other negative things were expressed in his address. I think it was the reaction of the community that led to the fact that he closed himself from the dialogue.
It was proposed to shorten routes, remove some unnecessary characters from the story, and so on.
But no one wanted to listen to L&P when he made modest attempts to explain to the whole public the motives for making his decisions. When he explained the difficulty of attracting outside help and so on, everyone laughed at his explanations and criticized every point.
By the way, I was called his lawyer for trying to support L&P, many people were also rude to me. I remember all this well.
That's why I say that I understand him, I also understand the reasons why he is not susceptible to criticism in his address, for him the implementation of the entire project is much more expensive than communicating with any of us.