- Thread starter CobraSGT
- Start date
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
I also found the reason why you wrote that the figure for 2023 compared to 2022 was 12.5%.
Of course your was wrong.
You are complete trash.
You bastard cheater.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
AGINAIN IN BOLD, I USED NUMBERS PROVIDED BY THIS PERSON IN THIS POST:
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-v0-201-lust-passion.5944/post-14051756
Here is the screen capture:
I will walk you through my process step by step because you clearly do not understand. I will use 2019 - 2020 as an example:
2019 - 2480
2020 - 2328
We want to know how much % wise 2020 (2328) is when compared to 2020 (2480).
We can do that using this equation:
(2019/100% = 2020/X%) and solve for X.
We know the values for 2019 and 2020 so lets put these into the equation:
2480/100% = 2328/X%
X = 232800/2328
X = 93.87%
Now, to get the % difference we need to subtract the X% value from 100%:
% = 100 - 93.87 = 6.12% (6.1% when rounded down)
This is 2ndary level Maths.
Also, to challenge your method how can you have 16.1% for 2019 - 2020?
2019 = 2480 renders, 10% of that is 248 renders,
2020 = 2328 renders, 2480 - 2328 = 152
When you subtract 2019 - 2020 you will get 152 renders. The difference is way less than 248 renders needed to achieve 10%,
How the fuck did you get 16%? To achieve 16% you need the difference to be 372 renders!
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
I clearly said, “You are not doing anything on your own.”
And even if calculated based on the above data, the difference in 2019 compared to 2018 is not 7.3%.
If you don't want to be called an asshole, recalculate the data and apologize.
*And I “already” stated that I calculated from January 1st to December 31st.*
*The above data is not mine.*
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
You are correct, it is 7.6 and not 7.3. No idea what happened, must have mistyped a number or something.
I will get this updated and correct the massive 0.3 mistake.
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
You should also apologize for the incorrect numbers for 2019 compared to 2018.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
I said clearly, “Even if you calculate it based on the above data,” you are wrong. (12.5% ???)
So you owe me an apology.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
- Dec 9, 2020
- 147
- 385
You seem to be right. The problem is in growing discrepancy... Sophia is say ten years younger then she was at the beginning of the game. We are seven years older. Thus the age difference has increased to 17 years.
When she might experience her first extramarital affair (not counting HJs, BJs and Antonio), we would be by another 7-8 years older. Hope Sophia won't look younger than 20 (no, please do not assume she would be underage... though the tendency is clear and this way she might find common language with the sex ed kids). The age difference would be close to thirty.
When L&P finishes the game, we will be a bunch of old timers drooling over a barely legal Sophia. I can imagine this nice view.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
Her face is not getting younger guys, quite the opposite.
Her skin needs a bit of work to match the features. See below for details:
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-v0-201-lust-passion.5944/post-13988441
Her skin needs a bit of work to match the features. See below for details:
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-v0-201-lust-passion.5944/post-13988441
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
I found your calculation formula. So I deleted my post.
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.
Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.
So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
No, calculation is correct. Year on year % difference in the render count.
Also the graph confirms it.
Feel free to share your findings together with methodology if you disagree.
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
This is the formula that resulted in the 12.5% you mentioned.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100", that's right?
I have noticed a trend in the Anglo-Saxon world to count, for example, the number of words contained in a text, or as in this case, the number of renders contained in an upgrade. This attention to a purely quantitative aspect is funny for someone who does not belong to your culture. But if the quality is high, how many renders are included in an upgrade, what does it matter? Well, the world is beautiful because it is varied...
- Apr 4, 2019
- 548
- 923
- Aug 24, 2021
- 209
- 606
You know it is. Why are you asking?
You know it is the same as 1646/100=1883/X right?)
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,630
- 3,792
This is the relative ratio you calculated.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100"
And the result is 12.58%.
This is the decline rate I calculated.
"=(1646-1883)/1646*100"
And the result is 14.39%.
And I included 760 in the above calculation (for your benefit), but again, that is a January 2024 figure so it should not be included in the above calculation.
- Jul 3, 2021
- 1,831
- 11,380
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);
2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022
Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;
2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022
Now you guys can continue ...
