- Oct 20, 2019
- 2,003
- 9,488
Well, in this image the improvement is highly evident than the other one, in the definition aspect. But the image seems to lose some three dimensionality, looks too plastic. To be fair, I think that you used a bad shot for the other one, even in the 720p frame her face looks unfocused, a bit blurry.- for the slightly blurry effect in 4k : i have the same effect on my 1440p screen, 1440p pictures appear sharper and that's pretty normal I suppose. But but the fact that it has the same effect on your screen (I assume you got a 4k screen), surprises me.
- My screen doesn't support HDR, i just adjusted the contrast a little bit.
- I disagree with you with the "no definition improvement", here is another example: I took one of the last renders of the game without noise particules
View attachment 722131
You can't say that just the noise was removed (original picture in attachment)
- For the rest, i agree that 4k details required a large screen to be seen, that's why i doubted the usefullness of 4k compared to 1440p which seems to be a good compromise in my opinion
No, my TV isn't RGBW. When you watch something in HDR looks very impressive, brutal, something that you can't see in my 37" 1080p TV. But if you watch something in 2K (1440p) you can't notice the differences compared to something in 4k. Why? Because of the size of the TV. You aren't watchching a 4K image in full size. The size of the TV is lower than the size of the 4K image. Unless, you see both 2k and 4k images at 200%. Then, the differences are evident.Because IT IS an AI upscale from a noisy, low quality 720p render, and yeah, the skin or walls textures are still horrible, but overall the result is quite impressive.
Are you talking about RGBW screens? It's a well known 'scam', so you fooked up buying one of these TV's.
Eeee, huge BS. 4k is 4k. As long as the PPI is no higher than the human eye can see at a certain distance, you are good (not wasting anything). 60" @ 4k means pitiful 73 ppi.
4K is about resolution, nothing more, it means 3840 × 2160, that's it.
For example, look at the following images in 4k and 2k, if you watch both in my 47" 4k TV, you don't notice the differences.
4k:
View attachment 724519
1440p:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I'm using my 1080p TV right now. If I select seeing the 4k image in its real size, this is what I see: (A big part of the image goes out of the screen)
4K:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
1440p:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Then you can notice the differences between a 4k and a 1440p image. What I'm saying is that if you want to perceive this same differences at 100%, you need a 4k TV above 60".
Now, F4iunyl3x if I compare this 4k image to your 4k image, both at their real size:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You can notice the huge differences in definition, your 4k image is even below than the 1440p image that I shared here. That's why I said none of your images correspond to those resolutions.
*For real size I mean what I see in my 1080p screen when the image is at 100%.
Edit: I didn't notice that the forum didn't allow me to upload the sample image in 4K, the original resolution is 5000x2160, and was converted automatically to a lower resolution. It seems that you can't surpass 3840 here.
I changed 2k for 1440p, some user here adviced me of my mistake.
Last edited: