CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

Sabertooth__

Well-Known Member
Sep 23, 2020
1,407
7,723
July 3.

View attachment 1573819



Who's the liar again? Preparing events for the update doesn't count for the dev cycle? Lmao



View attachment 1573820

Oh I had this one saved. Its from June 27 or something. It actually clearly says that he will start working on "Juliy 1st/2nd". Who's clearly lying after all?
Even L&P considers "preparing the events in his script" work as you can clearly see "I'll start working on the next update around July 1st/2nd".

And then on the 3rd he says "I will probably start with the scene creation".
He doesn't say "working on the next update" again. He specifically says which work inside the update he's going to start.

Apparently, even L&P agrees with me. Maybe, according to you, L&P did a dumb assumption about his own work? :ROFLMAO:

You're way out of your depth here, just be quiet because you keep getting schooled and I'm starting to feel second hand embarassment.
The most recent message counts, hope you know that. His work starts with seen creation always. Like even for this update, No scripting time was taken. Only once he starts scene creation, like it has always been.

Also the start date for the charts is taken based on the discussion with thread and Talcum Powder does try to keep the chart as objective as possible without being bais. So you can go on and on with your statements.

Other than that, Happy New Year.
 

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
The most recent message counts, hope you know that. His work starts with seen creation always. Like even for this update, No scripting time was taken. Only once he starts scene creation, like it has always been.

Other than that, Happy New Year.
It doesn't matter what we count here if THE DEV HIMSELF defines his work start on preparing the scenes, which he clearly does according to screenshots, hence why he says on June 27 that he'll start working on July 1/2 and then on July 3 and he says he's preparing the events for the new update and will "start scene creation". Preparing the script counts as work for the update. I consider it work, L&P considers it work too. It's quite simple. The only person not considering it work is you, because now that you see that you were wrong you don't want to admit. After all, I was being the liar and L&P "clearly said he starts working on 5th July", except he didn't, and I just showed you the screenshots you so wanted to see after I initially told you I was the one correcting you, with screenshots once again.

But look, the way you tone it down right after reading the posts from actual L&P defining his work start just says it all really. Don't bother admitting you were clearly wrong. Anyone reading those messages will see what's up.

Have a happy new year too, full of health. May we all live long enough to see the endings of AWAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toushiro

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
Here every update work is taken into consideration from his scene creation every update. The date agreed my majority members, used as reference for the entire cycle. What YOU believe is work is upto you.

Other than that Happy New Year.
I guess L&P is wrong then. I believe L&P starts working when he says he will start working, which on this case its clear that he started between July 1 and July 3.

Here it starts at scene creation because its when the visual chart with the 100%s comes along. It doesn't mean he only starts working there.
Unless you tell me that it is, in which case my next question is: how does the folder organizing time count as work to you if it doesn't show up on the %'s too? I guess those 5h/day that you're so pent up about don't mean anything considering we don't see them on any chart, right?

Either go by one logic or the other, don't shift whenever it suits you :)

Also, can you point out where he "clearly said" he would start working on 5th july? Your words.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Toushiro
Oct 18, 2019
157
335
Sabertooth__
It is strange, reading your responses, I feel a high intelligence and significant analytical ability, but when it comes to criticism, especially the author's specific blunders, you rush into a fight, defending his position, forgetting both reason and objectivity. Immediately and indisputably I declare that I can neither confirm nor refute anything by personal examples. for 1000 of my negative examples, you will give 1000 of yours - positive and vice versa.
Regarding the 2nd task, we must not forget that the raising of the dress was preceded by a conversation in class, i.e. rather small closed room and everyone heard this conversation. There was also a small conflict with Aiden's accomplice over the cap. If it had happened spontaneously, I agree that it would not have attracted such attention from the students. But everything was presented in a completely different way. Surely you understand this, but you do not want to agree with the obvious facts.
And I agree that the reality of the game is quite dynamic and can vary within reasonable limits, but the author increasingly goes beyond the reasonable limits of reality deformation, without presenting a convincing explanation of the reasons for what happened.
Those 3 reasons that he took as a basis from the beginning of the game:
1. My husband hasn't fucked me for a long time (three weeks).
2. I do this for the welfare of Dylan (family).
3. I drank and can't control myself. have already been used many times and their repeated applications cause a fair negative among users who tuned in to a beautiful erotic novel, but instead get a cheap porn comic strip (albeit a very high-quality drawn one).
 

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
Sabertooth__
It is strange, reading your responses, I feel a high intelligence and significant analytical ability, but when it comes to criticism, especially the author's specific blunders, you rush into a fight, defending his position, forgetting both reason and objectivity. Immediately and indisputably I declare that I can neither confirm nor refute anything by personal examples. for 1000 of my negative examples, you will give 1000 of yours - positive and vice versa.
Regarding the 2nd task, we must not forget that the raising of the dress was preceded by a conversation in class, i.e. rather small closed room and everyone heard this conversation. There was also a small conflict with Aiden's accomplice over the cap. If it had happened spontaneously, I agree that it would not have attracted such attention from the students. But everything was presented in a completely different way. Surely you understand this, but you do not want to agree with the obvious facts.
And I agree that the reality of the game is quite dynamic and can vary within reasonable limits, but the author increasingly goes beyond the reasonable limits of reality deformation, without presenting a convincing explanation of the reasons for what happened.
Those 3 reasons that he took as a basis from the beginning of the game:
1. My husband hasn't fucked me for a long time (three weeks).
2. I do this for the welfare of Dylan (family).
3. I drank and can't control myself. have already been used many times and their repeated applications cause a fair negative among users who tuned in to a beautiful erotic novel, but instead get a cheap porn comic strip (albeit a very high-quality drawn one).
Regarding the start of the game: I'm not sure for how long the idea of Liam being an MC was on L&P's mind so that might have influenced the story and some reason a little bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hzjujk

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
Exactly, I don't include it in the work cycle. But just because people assume he is roaming around during that time and doing nothing is the reason why he had to mention that he is not completely away from the game. Did I say you should include in his work cycle, no.

There are many more that he must be doing behind the scenes which directly or indirectly are related to this game but I don't include it. No one here does.
All that matters here to everyone is when one of the hundreds are started. That's it. His scripting or whatever it was related did not increase any of the 4 100's at all.

The onn time it did increase was after his scene creation. So that's when he works. Just like we did this time. Just like we did the time before that.

And this point bis right back at you. If it is not related to the percentage yet you consider it work then you should also consider his daz library organising as work and not say that he is taking a break. Acknowledge that he has been working all those days too.

It is either This Or the That. You decide.
If that's what he is actually doing then he is working on the game, it's a pain in the ass to organize Daz libraries but it should make you more efficient specially if you need to merge scenes, subsets, reuse props etc. My logic is the same for both things. Yours changes according to the wind. You bend over backwards and do some mental gymnastics, like you're doing here, to justitfy a clear mistep in your argument. If he's preparing a script for the update so he's clearly working on the update. Simple. It's like saying that the work of a movie is only shooting the scenes. Casting, Storyboard, Writing etc isn't. It's ridiculous.

I'm still waiting for you to quote L&P saying he would start "working" on the 5th. You said I was wrong and you called me a liar. Then I showed you screenshots from L&P himself to show you that you were the one lying once again and asked you (several times now) to show me where did L&P "clearly" said he was going to start working on the 5th.

You're still failing to produce that proof. Because it doesn't exist. You took it out of your ass and now either admit you were wrong and I wasn't lying (you were) or you do the mental gymnastics you're doing right now ;)

And the idea that Talcum is the one deciding when L&P considers what he is doing "work", is laughable. The dev cycle for L&P starts when he starts working on the update. In this case we had earlier info than usual. It's clear.
 
Last edited:

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
He said Monday which I would like to inform you is 5th July. His "working" is always starting on when his Creation begins.
That is written in the message. The proof you ask.
Whatever he does other than that, that does not affect the 4 indicators is not work taken into consideration.

He could write in his message someday. That on 2nd I will start looking for daz assets for the next update and I will start scene creation on 5th. Doesn't mean that his is new indicator of starting work. He has been doing it, he keeps doing. Just because he specifically mentions it once does mean I give special consideration to it.
lmao. He specifically says "I'm preparing the events in my script". To which events do you think he refers to? Sophia Soccer Coach DLC? It's clearly about the next update. Hence why in the next messages he presents you the events that will be on that update.
Seriously, the lenghts you go to... just looks sad at this point

It's like saying that the work of a movie is only shooting the scenes. Casting, Storyboard, Script etc isn't. It's ridiculous.
 

L&P's Father-in-Law

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2017
1,392
6,579
Then work is also getting the assets, imaging, organising the library for convenient use, making the cover. Even addressing his patrons, and the mails. As they all contribute to the making to ensuring L&P can continue his work.

At last Viper admits that L&P did not even take a break after every update and he is working each and everyday. Good to see you finally acknowledging work is more than the 4 percentages show and just because he doesn't include something in his indicator doesn't mean it is not work.

Finally some growth.
Wait, so NOW the percentages are the start of the work on the game? Lmao, make a decision buddy. For you, are they or are they not? If not, then you're saying he doesn't work outside of that. If yes, then you have to admit that the date of the scene creation is not the start of the dev cycle.
Which one is it buddy? Answer directly .

Just a note: the work you talk about, if it is for the update, it belongs to the dev cycle. Sourcing anything for the next update is part of the dev cycle of that update. It pains me that you don't know this. Once again you show a terrible lack of knowledge (just like when you said that batch render wasn't good without even knowing what it was, remember?)

And damn, your interpretation skills are really bad.
I didn't say I believe him and I didn't say he doesn't take breaks. Here are you lying again, smells desperate, 3rd time today, must be the new year. I specifically said:
" If that's what he is actually doing then he is working on the game"
It's quite easy to understand: if that's what he's doing, then he is working. If I believe he's doing that in those 2 weeks, that's another question and the answer is "no, I don't". 2 weeks organizing folders? Lmao.


Which brings another question for you buddy. Do you believe what L&P says? Then if yes, you must believe when he says "he is preparing the script" for the events of the next update.
Or don't you believe what L&P says?
Which one is it buddy? Answer directly .

Anyways, what you're doing right now is trying to change the subject to avoid the fact that you got caught lying twice (now three times). I was the one correcting you, like shown on screenshot.
Dev cycle started between July 1 and July 3, as shown on screenshot.

All you've shown so far is a bunch of lies and logical flaws in your arguments. I'm still waiting on L&P's screenshot "clearly" saying he was starting on the 5th. Your words.

Now I understand how you think you have more experience in school than the rest, you've been schooled nonstop today. :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:

bayrischman

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2021
1,039
1,111
Yeah, it is L&P's fault that he is a human and needs a break. That he has to organize his library like he mentioned in his message about what he does in the period that is referred to as complete break. Even KillJoys seemed to agree that would take time.
As for 3rd July that's your dumb assumption because L&P in his message clearly says that he starts working on 5th July which was also accepted as the actual start date on this thread. Now keep up your stupid arguments. I don't care.

I just wanted to show what a liar you are and that's done.
Goodbye, happy new year.
wow, in new year almost 3 hours just sabertooth. may someone disagree with sabertooth. or is the trat just for him.happy new year.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: BorgiaBou and roro

ancienregimele

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2017
1,930
6,377
When a woman sits down in a skirt, she must bring her legs together - this is nature. If she spread her legs, then this is either for the administration of natural needs or in order to correct something under her skirt (or take off).
I thought about this again & it could be that Sophia in the awkward position shown in the teaser is getting her balance adjusted on heels to lift her skirt, prior to removing her panties. Sometimes when women dressed like Sophia suddenly go into the hunkering posture they may wobble, or almost overbalance. When she gets a grip she'll bring her legs together. This only makes sense if there is a class full of students but still doesn't answer the questions as to why she doesn't do all this sitting in the chair, or if she's being observed by the pupil(s) to her left.

New Year Celebrations were non-existent & I'm completely sober. Checked into the thread to catch up, read the posts in depth & viewed the likes & facepalms count. (Mixed response as expected, whenever I say anything which some find controversial.. more in the months to come but only if the situation warrants it).

All the best for 2022.
 

nexer

Forum Fanatic
Feb 5, 2019
4,598
18,604
After the scene with Bennett in the restaurant, I think if Sophia had to take her panties off, she used the same "technique". She'd sit on the chair behind the desk and take off her panties. EoS. After that, she'd have Aiden lick them, eat them, .... whatever.

"Accident" is the key word and hence Sophia's position. What is "accident"? A wide movement and the skirt rises.
1641039515778.png
Skirt over butt, and in Sophie's position, a tight skirt, once past the 90º angle, you don't know where it stops.

And we got this
1641039577187.png
 
Last edited:

Dunav

Member
Apr 12, 2019
218
674
For me this game at the begging was really good, very realistic and very sexy. But at the time AWAM become very popular and the developer started to earn lots of money he become very confuse how to update his game. He started to add more and more story based contend in the game, than after few months the game already started to look like never ending story. It was good at some point because that means he got many ideas how to keep the story going, but because of that the progress got slower and slower. I hope this year he will found a way to get his work more organized and actually finish the first part of AWAM instead of leaving it behind and do something else as many others developers done it. Happy New Year to everyone and I hope in 2022 we will get more often updates, way more sexy than before and way more longer :)
 

uniformless

Member
Feb 20, 2021
192
515
I recently started this game after hearing a lot. I loved it in the beginning. Really, I couldn't stop devouring the story, I like the slowburn and the renders are really good. Then everything railed off with Aiden's tasks. I can't imagine the fmc feeling some lust while being blackmailed by threatening of violence toward her family or find it sexy... And you can't say no without closing the door to Dylan's scenes.
And by the top of it, add the casino debt and mafia popping out of nowhere.
Why does the story had to turn dark suddenly? A normal housewife going down, little by little (the "slowburn") and then bam, very bad things happen and you don't have control anymore (even you as the player). It feel like a real weak plot as excuse to show "more" skin than before.
 

Zuhl

Member
Aug 25, 2020
393
201
I recently started this game after hearing a lot. I loved it in the beginning. Really, I couldn't stop devouring the story, I like the slowburn and the renders are really good. Then everything railed off with Aiden's tasks. I can't imagine the fmc feeling some lust while being blackmailed by threatening of violence toward her family or find it sexy... And you can't say no without closing the door to Dylan's scenes.
And by the top of it, add the casino debt and mafia popping out of nowhere.
Why does the story had to turn dark suddenly? A normal housewife going down, little by little (the "slowburn") and then bam, very bad things happen and you don't have control anymore (even you as the player). It feel like a real weak plot as excuse to show "more" skin than before.
The story doesn't have to get dark. As an artist, you can't plan and program everything in addition to rpiute or alternative routes. but it is not a must and the game has a lot of choices. But you could tell the artist that you think it hurt that Dylant rout depends on Aiden route. I have to say so exactly I can't all reout but I don't think that the two routes are star dependent on each other. I think you can get ahead with Dylan without taking the Aidan route. But I don't swear like guest there are lots of routes and choices where I don't want to say anything wrong. But in fact the story of the game can get dark if the path is chosen it is not a must
 

uniformless

Member
Feb 20, 2021
192
515
I think if you're not doing Aiden, you can't do the shopping with Dylan and the fashion show. And these events are probably very important for Dylan's route (Sophia start to expose her body to Dylan with these). So I'm stuck as a player, I don't really have the choice anymore of playing the way I want because I need to endure some event I don't want (dark blackmail, threat of violence) to get events I want, even if those events are not in the same category at all. As a player, I don't like this.
 

Old Dog

Message Maven
Donor
Jul 20, 2017
15,970
98,968
I think if you're not doing Aiden, you can't do the shopping with Dylan and the fashion show. And these events are probably very important for Dylan's route (Sophia start to expose her body to Dylan with these). So I'm stuck as a player, I don't really have the choice anymore of playing the way I want because I need to endure some event I don't want (dark blackmail, threat of violence) to get events I want, even if those events are not in the same category at all. As a player, I don't like this.
Well after this task you will be able to dump Aiden and keep the Dylan route alive.
Also I don't think that the bikini fashion show/shopping is linked to the Aiden route.
 

Atton563

Co-Developer of Elite Garden
Game Developer
Feb 22, 2019
316
3,413
Well after this task you will be able to dump Aiden and keep the Dylan route alive.
Also I don't think that the bikini fashion show/shopping is linked to the Aiden route.
Sophia only goes shopping for a sundress if you are on the Aiden route so Dylan can't buy the bikini's otherwise plus if you don't take the Aiden deal then Dylan goes to bording school and you get the Dylan/Amber route instead.
 
3.20 star(s) 485 Votes