Becoming more life-like means that AI will be able to create 8 billion faces.
My understanding is they're intended to be about 15. But look and act, so effectively, 12. Hence easily considered kiddie porn, as seen with the recent shutdown of his Patreon account
Get rid of both. Neither do anything for the story
Only male I don't think is cringe af is probably Carlany1 else think this sam character is cringe n creepy af? i dont understand why the game dev is writing him like a hero? and why is sophia even bothering with this noob? not only is he cringy n creepy but he looks like! the post man looks better than him lol. i just joined today and im still on part one and i already cant stand him.
AFAIK an 18+ male who looks underage, loli is the corresponding term for women. Misused in the case of the 2nd side job. Dylan and Sam could probably be considered shota, whereas in the 2nd side job they're obviously children
A minigame where you have to shake your mouse during the scene with Dylan/Marie in a laundromat.
Dont search. Thats an edited pic.
That's exactly what I thought as I looked at the window behind the trees to the left of the Myers house.
Oh, I get so disgusted if I see another MD-43 for the ranger... it's so easy to changeThat's exactly what I thought as I looked at the window behind the trees to the left of the Myers house.
But damn it, the guys are right when they say, don't give L&P hints to create a new plot.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The only problem is that you don't need any hints, all this messing with a bitch is not for nothing, probably someone should catch her. Which makes me extremely sad. He gets more and more immersed in some kind of jungle instead of having fun.
(same for missing furniture, other people, cars, etc.) (not just LP - there are a lot out there)
I don't think you understand the software used for producing the games. Yes, Sophia is a model made by others for use by anyone who wants to purchase it. However, an artist can start from a blank model in the same software and make their own character completely from scratch... Meaning a human artist can also create the same 8 billion faces if they choose... AI, and let's be clear, we are actually talking about AGI, only generates what it can find already done by others (Humans).. A human artist can produce something from nothing, from an imagined idea from their own mind... No AGI can do this.
It is either foolish or arrogant to say that humans can create something completely new from nothing.
and with that originality dead... AI will keep regurgitating the same old stuff the large language models can scrape from the web.
Humans do not create. they discover.
If there was still the facepalm icon, that would have been enough for her last two posts. So I have to write that I think your last two posts are complete nonsense. Either that or we have a translation problem here.
wow..... I weep for the future.
Don't worry....certain people won't get far in the future!!
