After Aiden, Dylan is the second creepiest kid in this VN, he keeps provoking Sophia into intimate situations by making her clean his room for the porno mag, grabbing her during tickle, the forceful bikini show, sneaking into Sophia and her friends' sauna, etc. In every interaction he has with Sophia, it feels like he wants to collect her as a body count and he has a creepy stare among the kids. inmo
- Thread starter CobraSGT
- Start date
- May 6, 2017
- 1,713
- 5,337
Now once again for you. Dylan was actually planned as the antagonist. Until there was an outcry from his patreons when the twist was released. He deleted the twist, but kept the original twist story going for Dylan until PD13. That's why Dylan makes such a shitty appearance.
Then its a good job this is all fantasy then and we don't need to worry about Sophia going to jail unless she is going to visit Larry again as that was very hot!!!!
Dylan still doesn't look like he has a long-term plan for a relationship with Sophia on the other hand Sam is a genuine romantic and he brings her musician hobbies and is the closest guy when it comes romance in this VN.
- May 6, 2017
- 1,713
- 5,337
Did you read my comment carefully? L&P had no new storyline for Dylan and basically had major issues with incest between M/S.
With the tree-house-stalker next door, he has no problem telling a story that is well thought out from the start. If you play AWAM carefully, you should have noticed that he has turned Sam into a jack-of-all-trades. Totally nonsense. Which in turn suggests that Sam personifies L&P.
- Jan 10, 2019
- 678
- 1,911
Bro what are you talking about Dylan forces Sophia even grabbing her hands to get ready for the date. There is no romance just pure dominance by Dlyan to see what can he get away with it, Sam doesn't demand her to do stuff for him.
Even to avoid Dylan getting bullied by Aiden, she puts herself to get groped by his bullies. Dylan will always look bad overall.
- Oct 1, 2022
- 135
- 317
you're right about this point but ambitious is right about dylan being a creep, if he did that to girls he had a crush on in school they'll most likely keep away from him or report him to a teacher.
- Oct 1, 2022
- 135
- 317
- May 6, 2017
- 1,713
- 5,337
yeah so? don't be weird, if you are not turn on by Sophia you must be gay or a retard
- Dec 2, 2018
- 111
- 292
- Jan 20, 2022
- 241
- 586
Who used cello lessons as a threat to make Sofia his secret girlfriend
- Jul 31, 2018
- 590
- 1,278
End of September is a hope. That is only five weeks away. I hope you are right, but I doubt it.Relax it’s going to be released end of September as scheduled
If you want to feel old, Dakota Fanning (the little girl in that movie) turned 30 earlier this year...
- Dec 9, 2020
- 166
- 527
I don't think that the reasons you've mentioned are really comparable.
Sex ed class is illegal, no doubt. It's felony.
Too many passangers in one car is illegal. It's misdemeanor.
Foul in basketball is illegal. It's breaking rules of the game (by the way, there is nothing about groping in basketball rules
. At least in their versions I know).So the real issue is probably not the legal/illegal but what makes sense (at least some sense, contrary to nonsense) for Sophia and for the story. Sex ed class is not only seriously illegal but it's also stupid. Sitting in a car on somebody's lap... allowing for excessive contact in a game... this is completely different category, and I don't have any problem with this, especially if it's necessary for the plot. Let's hate or ignore any character from the game - because they are inconsistent, badly written, behaving in a nonsense way, but not because of a single unimportant incident.
No offence, just talking like cat to cat
.I wouldn't call it a threat as much as it is a scheme. It may not be obvious to some but for me, it seems like a well devised plot to screw the hot MILF neighbor next door. Creeps are not always defined by the obvious. In RL, stalkers, after being apprehended and their homes raided, were found to have had elaborate plots, numerous documents of a victims activities, et.al. People in RL have been, and still do, get charmed by the handsome, smooth-talking, intelligent sounding scammers of all time. The Enron scandal proved that as well as the guy involved in the cryptocurrency debacle. So I'm not willing to give Sam a pass on not being a creep just yet. At least with Dylan, we know where he's coming from. Both Dylan and Sam are responding to their hormones but Sam has the advantage of being able to tamper his down a notch to get the ultimate prize, Sophia's body.Who used cello lessons as a threat to make Sofia his secret girlfriend
Last edited:
- Aug 19, 2022
- 340
- 738
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,714
- 4,105
I avoided this debate because I didn't expect anyone here to be able to debate me on creation.
1. I used to think that creation and discovery were areas of scientific debate, but I later learned that they were areas of philosophical debate. (I learned this after I stopped arguing.)
2. The word "creative" is being used interchangeably, but I don't have the ability to separate them.
- We also call people who make videos creators. However, the term creator used here is closer to maker or producer.
- When the debate first arose, he said that humans created something new from nothing, so I took it in a religious sense, and the term creator at that time was different from maker or producer to me.
3. I tried to say, "Most human actions are imitations, and this is also possible for AI," but I didn't think I could explain it in English.
Here are the limitations of what I am trying to say in English:
"The concept of the number zero was created and established by humans, but it was not created by humans, it was discovered by humans."
I wrote this not to start a debate, but to avoid one.
I do not believe that this debate is possible with people who say, "Every country calculates its wealth or taxes in dollars," or "Sex is sex, and foreplay is sex too." Also I don’t want to do it.
For those who change dictionary definitions at will and ignore legal definitions based on a single word from L&P, this argument is too high-level and I don't want to be bothered by them.
This is why I was hysterical when I saw the word creation.
(No matter what anyone says about this later, I declare my abstention in advance.)
1. I used to think that creation and discovery were areas of scientific debate, but I later learned that they were areas of philosophical debate. (I learned this after I stopped arguing.)
2. The word "creative" is being used interchangeably, but I don't have the ability to separate them.
- We also call people who make videos creators. However, the term creator used here is closer to maker or producer.
- When the debate first arose, he said that humans created something new from nothing, so I took it in a religious sense, and the term creator at that time was different from maker or producer to me.
3. I tried to say, "Most human actions are imitations, and this is also possible for AI," but I didn't think I could explain it in English.
Here are the limitations of what I am trying to say in English:
"The concept of the number zero was created and established by humans, but it was not created by humans, it was discovered by humans."
I wrote this not to start a debate, but to avoid one.
I do not believe that this debate is possible with people who say, "Every country calculates its wealth or taxes in dollars," or "Sex is sex, and foreplay is sex too." Also I don’t want to do it.
For those who change dictionary definitions at will and ignore legal definitions based on a single word from L&P, this argument is too high-level and I don't want to be bothered by them.
This is why I was hysterical when I saw the word creation.
(No matter what anyone says about this later, I declare my abstention in advance.)