- Mar 12, 2021
- 7
- 10
How can I play the game on iPhone 13
Sell it n buy androidHow can I play the game on iPhone 13
Buy „Spark” on App StoreHow can I play the game on iPhone 13
Not true. To avoid Dylan getting bullied by Aiden, just don't accept the tasks. Aiden has done fuck all to Dylan on the boarding school pathEven to avoid Dylan getting bullied by Aiden, she puts herself to get groped by his bullies. Dylan will always look bad overall.
My only point is that some options in the game appear completely opposite to how we are presented Sophia would act. One of the main reasons I don't play Aiden's blackmail is that I don't believe Sophia would submit to it when her brother-in-law is a well-connected, practically billionaire. Apparently, Carl has something like a half-dozen lawyers of Aiden's uncle's caliber on his payroll. He more or less signs a blank cheque to the boarding school to get Dylan accepted.I don't think that the reasons you've mentioned are really comparable.
Sex ed class is illegal, no doubt. It's felony.
Too many passangers in one car is illegal. It's misdemeanor.
Foul in basketball is illegal. It's breaking rules of the game (by the way, there is nothing about groping in basketball rules . At least in their versions I know).
So the real issue is probably not the legal/illegal but what makes sense (at least some sense, contrary to nonsense) for Sophia and for the story. Sex ed class is not only seriously illegal but it's also stupid. Sitting in a car on somebody's lap... allowing for excessive contact in a game... this is completely different category, and I don't have any problem with this, especially if it's necessary for the plot. Let's hate or ignore any character from the game - because they are inconsistent, badly written, behaving in a nonsense way, but not because of a single unimportant incident.
No offence, just talking like cat to cat .
Normally rendering is 5% behind. Why it is 15% now?Progress Report Ver. 0.210
40% - 25% - 0%
0% - 0% - 0%
View attachment 3948966
First of all, L&P wrote at some point that Sam is honest with Sophia. So even if it looks like that, there is no conspiracy!I wouldn't call it a threat as much as it is a scheme. It may not be obvious to some but for me, it seems like a well devised plot to screw the hot MILF neighbor next door. Creeps are not always defined by the obvious. In RL, stalkers, after being apprehended and their homes raided, were found to have had elaborate plots, numerous documents of a victims activities, et.al. People in RL have been, and still do, get charmed by the handsome, smooth-talking, intelligent sounding scammers of all time. The Enron scandal proved that as well as the guy involved in the cryptocurrency debacle. So I'm not willing to give Sam a pass on not being a creep just yet. At least with Dylan, we know where he's coming from. Both Dylan and Sam are responding to their hormones but Sam has the advantage of being able to tamper his down a notch to get the ultimate prize, Sophia's body.
What do you mean by that? Can you explain it?…is that his route is closest to an NTR or Mom-NTR route in terms of content
Just a feeling I have!What do you mean by that? Can you explain it?
The thing is that the chicken fight is just a small consolation prize for Dylan. Choosing to send him to boarding school is like saying without notifying the player that this is the end of Sophia and Dylan events for the rest of the game. Only it tricks the player by peppering in some Dylan+ points for Sophia in a couple of scenes after but essentially leading to nothing there.Just a feeling I have!
A man with a big cock and outstanding skills in the art of sexual love takes away a woman from a man with a smaller cock (who is therefore by definition a loser), who already feels neglected and longs for a new life with lots of sex.
The only thing that doesn't fit is that Sam isn't a dark-skinned person.
And with Dylan, the scene of the chicken fight in the swimming pool fits in quite well.
But as I wrote, these are just vibes and not worth a big discussion.
In return, Dylan takes Sam's mother in a specific path. I wonder if Dylan suspects something about his mother and Sam and is therefore now going after Sam's mother out of revenge?Just a feeling I have!
A man with a big cock and outstanding skills in the art of sexual love takes away a woman from a man with a smaller cock (who is therefore by definition a loser), who already feels neglected and longs for a new life with lots of sex.
The only thing that doesn't fit is that Sam isn't a dark-skinned person.
And with Dylan, the scene of the chicken fight in the swimming pool fits in quite well.
But as I wrote, these are just vibes and not worth a big discussion.
It didn't seem like it. Amber has the hots for Dylan and initiated the naughtiness. If Dylan knew about Sam and Sophia, given his jealousy in their pool, he'd have a cow and he and Sam would be in a fight.In return, Dylan takes Sam's mother in a specific path. I wonder if Dylan suspects something about his mother and Sam and is therefore now going after Sam's mother out of revenge?
My question, is why bother? What's the point in playing any of the boring af Dylan events, if not to play the Sophia/Dylan storyline?The thing is that the chicken fight is just a small consolation prize for Dylan. Choosing to send him to boarding school is like saying without notifying the player that this is the end of Sophia and Dylan events for the rest of the game. Only it tricks the player by peppering in some Dylan+ points for Sophia in a couple of scenes after but essentially leading to nothing there.
Go to the nearest store, sell your iPhone, buy a android phone, install the game.. enjoy..How can I play the game on iPhone 13
Just seach AWAM on xhamster and you'll have itHow can I play the game on iPhone 13
We are people on an adult forum, from across this big globe that come from backgrounds and beliefs that differ in huge ways with beliefs stemming from religion, politics and a myriad of other diversities... I never looked for an argument, I only wanted to give a view to promote discussion on what is only to give an opinion... If through translation to you this has not transposed to something that you hold true, I fear it is because, face to face we have not been able to properly discuss...This I fear is the world we live in... and from this I fear is the world the AI dreams some of you have for instant gratification of games, will lead to issues down the track... tofhdns you need not make excuses for what was a translation miss understanding... I hold no issue and for me the matter is closed... Thanks for your explanation for your response.I avoided this debate because I didn't expect anyone here to be able to debate me on creation.
1. I used to think that creation and discovery were areas of scientific debate, but I later learned that they were areas of philosophical debate. (I learned this after I stopped arguing.)
2. The word "creative" is being used interchangeably, but I don't have the ability to separate them.
- We also call people who make videos creators. However, the term creator used here is closer to maker or producer.
- When the debate first arose, he said that humans created something new from nothing, so I took it in a religious sense, and the term creator at that time was different from maker or producer to me.
3. I tried to say, "Most human actions are imitations, and this is also possible for AI," but I didn't think I could explain it in English.
Here are the limitations of what I am trying to say in English:
"The concept of the number zero was created and established by humans, but it was not created by humans, it was discovered by humans."
I wrote this not to start a debate, but to avoid one.
I do not believe that this debate is possible with people who say, "Every country calculates its wealth or taxes in dollars," or "Sex is sex, and foreplay is sex too." Also I don’t want to do it.
For those who change dictionary definitions at will and ignore legal definitions based on a single word from L&P, this argument is too high-level and I don't want to be bothered by them.
This is why I was hysterical when I saw the word creation.
(No matter what anyone says about this later, I declare my abstention in advance.)
I don't enjoy discussions here anymore.We are people on an adult forum, from across this big globe that come from backgrounds and beliefs that differ in huge ways with beliefs stemming from religion, politics and a myriad of other diversities... I never looked for an argument, I only wanted to give a view to promote discussion on what is only to give an opinion... If through translation to you this has not transposed to something that you hold true, I fear it is because, face to face we have not been able to properly discuss...This I fear is the world we live in... and from this I fear is the world the AI dreams some of you have for instant gratification of games, will lead to issues down the track... tofhdns you need not make excuses for what was a translation miss understanding... I hold no issue and for me the matter is closed... Thanks for your explanation for your response.
A bit nihilistic or god like don't you think??? If you do not wish to debate then do not express a view in the first place.I avoided this debate because I didn't expect anyone here to be able to debate me on creation.
1. I used to think that creation and discovery were areas of scientific debate, but I later learned that they were areas of philosophical debate. (I learned this after I stopped arguing.)
2. The word "creative" is being used interchangeably, but I don't have the ability to separate them.
- We also call people who make videos creators. However, the term creator used here is closer to maker or producer.
- When the debate first arose, he said that humans created something new from nothing, so I took it in a religious sense, and the term creator at that time was different from maker or producer to me.
3. I tried to say, "Most human actions are imitations, and this is also possible for AI," but I didn't think I could explain it in English.
Here are the limitations of what I am trying to say in English:
"The concept of the number zero was created and established by humans, but it was not created by humans, it was discovered by humans."
I wrote this not to start a debate, but to avoid one.
I do not believe that this debate is possible with people who say, "Every country calculates its wealth or taxes in dollars," or "Sex is sex, and foreplay is sex too." Also I don’t want to do it.
For those who change dictionary definitions at will and ignore legal definitions based on a single word from L&P, this argument is too high-level and I don't want to be bothered by them.
This is why I was hysterical when I saw the word creation.
(No matter what anyone says about this later, I declare my abstention in advance.)
I regret it now.A bit nihilistic or god like don't you think??? If you do not wish to debate then do not express a view in the first place.