I avoided this debate because I didn't expect anyone here to be able to debate me on creation.
1. I used to think that creation and discovery were areas of scientific debate, but I later learned that they were areas of philosophical debate. (I learned this after I stopped arguing.)
2. The word "creative" is being used interchangeably, but I don't have the ability to separate them.
- We also call people who make videos creators. However, the term creator used here is closer to maker or producer.
- When the debate first arose, he said that humans created something new from nothing, so I took it in a religious sense, and the term creator at that time was different from maker or producer to me.
3. I tried to say, "Most human actions are imitations, and this is also possible for AI," but I didn't think I could explain it in English.
Here are the limitations of what I am trying to say in English:
"The concept of the number zero was created and established by humans, but it was not created by humans, it was discovered by humans."
I wrote this not to start a debate, but to avoid one.
I do not believe that this debate is possible with people who say, "Every country calculates its wealth or taxes in dollars," or "Sex is sex, and foreplay is sex too." Also I don’t want to do it.
For those who change dictionary definitions at will and ignore legal definitions based on a single word from L&P, this argument is too high-level and I don't want to be bothered by them.
This is why I was hysterical when I saw the word creation.
(No matter what anyone says about this later, I declare my abstention in advance.)