That is an outdated image that has been changed and proof it wouldn't take much to age up the youngest tutor boy. The two older tutor boys are the same age as Dylan, Sam, Zach and Aiden. It hasn't been outright stated they are but they look the same age.The reason they are called shota's is that is how they are presented. They're meant to be the opposite of the old men in the 1st side job.
However, early game Dylan/Sam aren't far off from them. Especially Dylan with his Justin Bieber hairdo. He could practically be the 4th Myer. Many of the characters in this game are meant to be below 18. Sophia is literally a school teacher. His route is even based around "sex ed" too. As well as LP literally made 2 versions of the game, because he had the "real" Dylan model (and other younger male LI"S) and the "aged up" ones to get around Patreon rules. People just choose to ignore that for the most part.
View attachment 4043623
doesn't mean they're shota, that just means L&P screwed himself by not properly explaining them and left himself open for some eejit reporting AWAM because they can't stand L&P.If the apostles were the proper age they would still be in the game, right now the only way to play there scenes is through a patch
No I'm not, underage and age of consent are the same thing but are like the different sides of the same coin. You're either underage or you're of age of consent, it's one or the other. I'm saying the tutor boys are age of consent but the youngest might not be, age him up like Dylan and Sam and completely sorted.You're mixing up 'underage' with 'age of consent'. You're talking about the age of consent, which doesn't mean they are not underage.
That said, Dylan for example clearly does look older than these children, and even Dylan is portrayed to be like 16-17 at most. There's a reason L&P's written his upcoming birthday to be his 1X'th. Let's not shit ourselves here. We all know this kind of content makes him alot of money. Some people would probably argue 'the younger the better'....
L&P has backed himself into a corner so many times by not properly explaining things, its almost like he is trying to be too clever with his answers.That is an outdated image that has been changed and proof it wouldn't take much to age up the youngest tutor boy. The two older tutor boys are the same age as Dylan, Sam, Zach and Aiden. It hasn't been outright stated they are but they look the same age.
doesn't mean they're shota, that just means L&P screwed himself by not properly explaining them and left himself open for some eejit reporting AWAM because they can't stand L&P.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are these things called pose libraries. Making the effort of clicking a different thumbnail before rendering must be some ground breaking shit.Hahahahah, Dude expects real life facial expressions from cartoon renderings.
Their lack of general knowledge is enough to say they're maybe 12. Certainly not Dylan's age.That is an outdated image that has been changed and proof it wouldn't take much to age up the youngest tutor boy. The two older tutor boys are the same age as Dylan, Sam, Zach and Aiden. It hasn't been outright stated they are but they look the same age.
18 is still the opposite of the old guy and Sophia is a teacher but I don't recall anywhere in AWAM saying she was a high school teacher, we presume she is but it easily could be (or changed to) a college.
doesn't mean they're shota, that just means L&P screwed himself by not properly explaining them and left himself open for some eejit reporting AWAM because they can't stand L&P.
No I'm not, underage and age of consent are the same thing but are like the different sides of the same coin. You're either underage or you're of age of consent, it's one or the other. I'm saying the tutor boys are age of consent but the youngest might not be, age him up like Dylan and Sam and completely sorted.
Then at the start of the tutor boys route, when Sophia and their mother are talking, add their ages in there, and sorted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At the end of the day, my point is they shouldn't be called shota boys because they're not and that is a fact. For every sign that they are, there are other signs that they aren't. This brings me back to the same point I'm sure we can all agree on, L&P left it open for interpretation and should've defined it better.
Care to show us your work in Daz? Or any VN you've worked on?There are these things called pose libraries. Making the effort of clicking a different thumbnail before rendering must be some ground breaking shit.
"Cartoon"... cartoon is only a part of the full character. You have a whole lot of cartoons to use as layers over the 3D model. YOU are cartoon rendering! The rendering of a boomer cartoon
You can get some really great expressions for 3d characters as it can make or break your picture.There are these things called pose libraries. Making the effort of clicking a different thumbnail before rendering must be some ground breaking shit.
"Cartoon"... cartoon is only a part of the full character. You have a whole lot of cartoons to use as layers over the 3D model. YOU are cartoon rendering! The rendering of a boomer cartoon
if you mean general knowledge of sex and women, I've always said that they know more than they let on and I wouldn't be surprised if that turns out to be true that they're manipulating Sophia, just like they did with every other tutor they had that has quit.Their lack of general knowledge is enough to say they're maybe 12. Certainly not Dylan's age.
wait... is this your guess or is it certain that tutoring ends after this update?if you mean general knowledge of sex and women, I've always said that they know more than they let on and I wouldn't be surprised if that turns out to be true that they're manipulating Sophia, just like they did with every other tutor they had that has quit.
At the start, I'm sure MS Myers (they're mum) stated that there had been other tutors but they kept quitting, can't remember the text for 100% certainty.
L&P should confirm this in the next update by having their sister outing them and then the tutor job comes to an end.
We know that both side jobs will end with the care home being the first but when this will happens I cannot remember.wait... is this your guess or is it certain that tutoring ends after this update?
i don't read the thread much, maybe i missed something?
This is a guess but L&P was talking earlier in the year about removing the side jobs and since the tutor job is part of why he just lost his patron, I could see him bringing it to an end in the next update and I think he should.wait... is this your guess or is it certain that tutoring ends after this update?
i don't read the thread much, maybe i missed something?
I would like that also but considering what it could cost him in Patrons.This is a guess but L&P was talking earlier in the year about removing the side jobs and since the tutor job is part of why he just lost his patron, I could see him bringing it to an end in the next update and I think he should.
yes, but the patreon option has already failed... so why get rid of a story path that has its share of audience.This is a guess but L&P was talking earlier in the year about removing the side jobs and since the tutor job is part of why he just lost his patron, I could see him bringing it to an end in the next update and I think he should.
yeah, L&P will continue to milk AWAM and I don't blame him. If he keeps making money from it, he should keep it going.I would like that also but considering what it could cost him in Patrons.
because it could cost him subscribe star and other ways he makes money and the side jobs don't have much story life in them.yes, but the patreon option has already failed... so why get rid of a story path that has its share of audience.
Maybe patron is easier for his patrons but SS does seem to have more flexible rules.yes, but the patreon option has already failed... so why get rid of a story path that has its share of audience.
Actually the filthy path is the bad ending for the gw route.yeah, L&P will continue to milk AWAM and I don't blame him. If he keeps making money from it, he should keep it going.
I think he should go a different route though and actually bring AWAM to an end after a few more updates, then do spin-offs after that, there is NO CHANCE he does this but its what I would do.
The Ending of AWAM
Depending on the choices you make, it ends with Sophia having sex with Dylan or Ellie, or both in a 3some.
Spin-off - AWAM: Aiden Side Jobs
It's very easy to bring this to an end after the alley scene we last saw, and Dylan should be able to protect himself now, so really doesn't make sense to continue it but the spin-off explores Sophia continuing with it because she wants to.
Spin-off - AWAM: Ellie Bitch
We know there is a setting for this and this spinoff explores how much of a bitch Ellie will be to Sophia, and how far Sophia goes with it.
Spin-off - AWAM Good Wife
Sophia and Liam focus on swinging with other couples and both agreeing to have sex with other people, could have more scenes with Dylan, Ellie, Sam etc on this route.
Spin-off - AWAM All the way
Pretty much Sophia goes all out and becomes addicted to sex, loses herself in it and it becomes a story of her family trying to stop her going too far.
He basically develops one spin-off at a time until it's finished.
because it could cost him subscribe star and other ways he makes money and the side jobs don't have much story life in them.
yes but it seems strange to me... since there is also the incest problem and therefore patreon is out of reach anyway. or am I wrong?Maybe patron is easier for his patrons but SS does seem to have more flexible rules.
That is an outdated image that has been changed and proof it wouldn't take much to age up the youngest tutor boy. The two older tutor boys are the same age as Dylan, Sam, Zach and Aiden. It hasn't been outright stated they are but they look the same age.
18 is still the opposite of the old guy and Sophia is a teacher but I don't recall anywhere in AWAM saying she was a high school teacher, we presume she is but it easily could be (or changed to) a college.
doesn't mean they're shota, that just means L&P screwed himself by not properly explaining them and left himself open for some eejit reporting AWAM because they can't stand L&P.
No I'm not, underage and age of consent are the same thing but are like the different sides of the same coin. You're either underage or you're of age of consent, it's one or the other. I'm saying the tutor boys are age of consent but the youngest might not be, age him up like Dylan and Sam and completely sorted.
Then at the start of the tutor boys route, when Sophia and their mother are talking, add their ages in there, and sorted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At the end of the day, my point is they shouldn't be called shota boys because they're not and that is a fact. For every sign that they are, there are other signs that they aren't. This brings me back to the same point I'm sure we can all agree on, L&P left it open for interpretation and should've defined it better.