No I'm not, underage and age of consent are the same thing but are like the different sides of the same coin. You're either underage or you're of age of consent, it's one or the other. I'm saying the tutor boys are age of consent but the youngest might not be, age him up like Dylan and Sam and completely sorted.
Then at the start of the tutor boys route, when Sophia and their mother are talking, add their ages in there, and sorted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At the end of the day, my point is they shouldn't be called shota boys because they're not and that is a fact. For every sign that they are, there are other signs that they aren't. This brings me back to the same point I'm sure we can all agree on, L&P left it open for interpretation and should've defined it better.
Oh boy, you really are trying hard to make these kids older than they obviously are. As for age of consent and underage being the same thing; you're just wrong. Age of consent is a term specifically used to describe a person's ability to give their consent for sexual activities. Underage has so many different meanings. It's not different sides of the same coin. Or are you saying that you can consent to drinking alcohol legally once you've reached the age of consent?
Underage: Younger than the lowest age at which a particular activity is legally allowed (for example Alcohol)
Age of consent: The age at which someone is considered by the law to be old enough to agree to have sex with someone
So like I said, you can be underage (as in not an adult) and still have the age of consent. You were arguing that they are not underage, and while technically underage with it's various meanings could also mean 'too young for sex', this discussion was particularly about their age of consent. But I guess we're just talking semantics here at this point, so fuck it.
The important thing is that; The shota boys are very clearly pubescent (or pre-pubescent even) kids, and L&P is portraying them as such. The only reason he's writing them to be highschoolers and whatnot is for legal reasons, and you know it. And not even that stopped Patreon from banning him for CSAM. Everyone knows that they are not of age, and there's a reason L&P removed them from the game making it a Patch-only addition that's supposed to cut the connection between this underage content and AWAM.
Now, as for your "fact" in regards to them not being shota boys and your "counter signs", I'd love to hear some arguments and examples. Thank you!
shall we expect this in new update are we?
