Kirill86

Member
Nov 22, 2019
490
1,665
A wise old man once said :

''as long as the sheep stays in lane and trust their master - and the master will shave wool from the sheep''

(p.s, im not saying followers and everyone who support him is sheep or stupid - just sad and pathetic little creatures)
why do you discuss over and over again the topic of how people manage their own money? for me, this $65.5 is just dust in the wind
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,435
18,596
wait let me get this right it took 6 years to make this and those 6 years the game as went no where
If you're into the GW side (Sophia/Liam) or you want to see cast members (Filthy side) besides Sophia having sex unless you count "Antonio," Other than that... Yeah, it didn't go anywhere on the Filthy side.
 

Kirill86

Member
Nov 22, 2019
490
1,665
If you're into the GW side (Sophia/Liam) or you want to see cast members (Filthy side) besides Sophia having sex unless you count "Antonio," Other than that... Yeah, it didn't go anywhere on the Filthy side.
just HJ for Dylan and full nude for Sam and groping for Aiden and his gang
 

Kirill86

Member
Nov 22, 2019
490
1,665
If you read the board, people are more interested in when the sex scene is going to start with Sophia with others, not the foreplay leading up to it.
it has long been known that waiting at least another 5 years until at least a semblance of Sofia's sex scene with a man who is not her husband
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,435
18,596
it has long been known that waiting at least another 5 years until at least a semblance of Sofia's sex scene with a man who is not her husband
It has been known since the start, yes, but he also stated that Sophia couldn't be corrupt so quickly, but that went out the window when the second side job was added, for example, as she did sexual things with them on the 2nd PD of meeting them. She went from 0 to 100 mph on the corruption scale. So, if that is possible, how come sex isn't possible now? He blew up his rationale for Sophia's slow corruption.
 
Jul 6, 2023
72
195
It has been known since the start, yes, but he also stated that Sophia couldn't be corrupt so quickly, but that went out the window when the second side job was added, for example, as she did sexual things with them on the 2nd PD of meeting them. She went from 0 to 100 mph on the corruption scale. So, if that is possible, how come sex isn't possible now? He blows up his rationale for Sophia's slow corruption.
Because dev lost his concept. There is other wise man quote that says :

'' only worse than TOO FAST is to be , TOO LATE my friend '' . He lost momentum.
He start to milk after 2 years, then got - either rushed or lost in translation (with it, he lost plot and concept) also typical dev pre mature cum , he wanted quick money grab so he added more and more chars into game and instead of continuation of some side task and stories - he lost himself once more then decided (PANIC MODE) to jump from stories to some random side character (mom of Sam) JUST TO GIVE SOMETHING TO PATREONS FOLLOWERS SO THEY DONT QUIT ON HIM!!

Chars like janitors, rapist in metro, husband of Sophi' sis , workers etc.....BY THIS POINT ARE WASTED ASSETS AND TIME TO GAME PLOT - TO FUCKING NO REASON AT ALL TO PROLONG MILIKING AND HE WILL NEVER FINISH THE GAME !!
 

Old Dog

Message Maven
Donor
Jul 20, 2017
15,993
99,094
His original reason was to see who was the most popular supporting character, which is why Sophia wasn't in the poll. I guess he might be using it now to start trimming the fat after he was told numerous times to "trim the fat" as the story is too large for him to handle, and he's making comments now on how the AV is too large for him to abide by himself.
The poll is useless as a giude as people will mainly remember the last couple of updates so characters we have not seen in quite sometime will score low.
 
Jul 6, 2023
72
195
The poll is useless as a giude as people will mainly remember the last couple of updates so characters we have not seen in quite sometime will score low.

Tell me then where is / are chars like :

- janitor from shower
- workers who got erection on daughter and sophi in prolog
- rapist from metro
- 3 kids infront museum that soph and sis gave numbas
- eidan gang
- 3 child pedos side job
- 2 old granpas side job
- husband of soph sis who flirt in pool
- neighbour mustache guy from WC that rubbed drunk sophi
etc etc etc ???
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,714
4,105
why do you discuss over and over again the topic of how people manage their own money? for me, this $65.5 is just dust in the wind
Assuming that updates are made once every three months on average, I don't know if it's worth paying $196.5 to receive one update.
But I understand that money may be like dust to you.

However, the reason people talk about subscribers' spending behavior is not because of the amount is large or small, but because of what the behavior means.

Sponsorship can sometimes be a way of expressing support or another way of voting.

I try not to pass judgment on this, as each individual may have different standards as to whether this developer is worthy of sponsorship.

However, if the subscribers' actions mean that this developer's actions are justified or that this developer's way of doing things should be maintained, then I am against it.

I never said "don't let support this developer," but I did say "some of their subscribers are either zombies or don't seem to care about what they're spending."

Because, as you said, to me it is not 'money' but 'votes'.

The way to change developer behavior is for subscribers to change their own behavior first.
If subscribers don't change, there's no reason for developers to change.
This is so common sense.

And when I looked at the recent graph, it seems like subscribers are starting to change.
 

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,927
6,089
why do you discuss over and over again the topic of how people manage their own money? for me, this $65.5 is just dust in the wind
Your reply is the very exact core of the issue. It's not about wiping one's ass with their money or lighting cigarettes with it; it's about the results they expect. If you like what you're getting for your dime - by all means, pay him even $1,000 per month or more. But if you don't like it (and I see no fucking reason why you would), yet you keep paying him... well, then you clearly have a problem.
 

PietruccioTheHilander

Forum Fanatic
Jul 17, 2019
5,777
14,252
Your reply is the very exact core of the issue. It's not about wiping one's ass with their money or lighting cigarettes with it; it's about the results they expect. If you like what you're getting for your dime - by all means, pay him even $1,000 per month or more. But if you don't like it (and I see no fucking reason why you would), yet you keep paying him... well, then you clearly have a problem.
wolf02.gif
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,435
18,596
The poll is useless as a giude as people will mainly remember the last couple of updates so characters we have not seen in quite sometime will score low.
That is the problem when you try to have the entire population of San Alejo trying to interact with Sophia, and Alyssa can only see her on Tuesday. :ROFLMAO: You can only fit so many characters into an event window and do so much within a 30-PD cycle.
 

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,927
6,089
Assuming that updates are made once every three months on average, I don't know if it's worth paying $196.5 to receive one update.
But I understand that money may be like dust to you.
As long as he's ok with what he gets, he can even pay $1,000,000. Why would he be ok - that is beyond my comprehension and a task for a good medical professional.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,714
4,105
it has long been known that waiting at least another 5 years until at least a semblance of Sofia's sex scene with a man who is not her husband
It has never been known as such.

The developer initially announced that he would finish the game in 5 years, and after 5 years he said that he wanted to finish it in 7 years and that he did not want to spend 10 years with it.
 
3.20 star(s) 494 Votes