Desty_Nova
New Member
- Dec 2, 2025
- 3
- 3
- 3
More mods yes, but in regards of the performance I would have to disagree.For now HC has more mods, simply because it come out first and AC is relatively new. And HC has a studio as well (DigitalCraft), AC hasn't. This will probably change over time, and AC might get a studio too eventually. Gameplay-wise similar, but HC has just three scenes with minimal, menu-like dialogs (exactly the same as HS2), while AC has lot more ground, cutscenes and elaborate dialogs (more like KK/KKS).
More importantly, while HC runs smooth and nice (60 or more FPS no probs), AC is so laggish that it's literally unplayable on my computer (the very long loading times make you loose your boner, which kinda counterproductive and an epic fail for a h-game, and even after it's loaded it's about 3-4 FPS only, looking around is a PITA and doing any interaction with a jogging girl is nearly impossible).
Be warned, unless you have a top-shelf gamer PC with superfast disks, cutting-edge top-of-the-line GPU and zillion gigabytes of RAM, don't even bother trying AC, it just won't run properly.
Haven't played HC in a while but as far as I'm concerned AC is playing fine on a non top shelf gamer pc.
Perf in those type of games are a touchy subject. I've always had second hand pc and always managed to play Ill-something games mostly without issues while seeing people complaining their top of the line leet gamer pc a xK$ was burning with just the intro.
Is it optimized ? no
Is it more/better optimized than previous product ? debatable.
Loading time is long but not that much longer than for exemple KKS (which is the latest I played).
So far and as far as I'm concerned, I enjoy it much more than HC and more than KK/KKS/SVS.
Mainly du to the village context that I find well done.
Last edited: