Not entirely all jaguars are panthers but not all panthers are jaguars. If you are referring to the classic black panther you can be referring to 2 different animals black variations, the jaguar and the leopard.
You are comparing the black variation of a leopard with a jaguar it is not the same. What the dude said is partially right.panther-vs-jaguar.jpg sure if you consider that there is a major size difference (1 is tops 130 pounds where the other can get up to 200+ pounds and than not even to talk about the height), both live on a entire different continent ,and there colours are way off sure it's your party to believe that they are 1 and the same
For me is even more simple. I don't think a man really loves a woman if he share her. So no been able to access sharing in the love route is the most obvious and natural thing.
As I said, that is not the problem here. My point is that the sharing paths can only be reached/started playing one specific way. And that is it what I see as problematic. Even if you are indifferent to a person or have basic sympathy for a former schoolmate, you are able to choose decent options which should not cancel out pragmatic options.
It goes even beyond that... a person can't share a person to begin with. People aren't objects. If I ask you to borrow me a pencil and you share it with me than yes of course why not. But a human being? Just no.
I think the NTR fans are taking it out on us vanilla peeps. Too long have our kind gone into the NTR threads asking, demanding, begging and whining for vanilla routes. They're getting us back by doing the exact same thing here.
NTR in the love patch, ok, no need. But a sharing with the two agreeing characters would be possible or an exchange of couple as at the beginning of the game, but more "consenting" version. There may be, even for other ideas, a "love" version with common agreement and another different harder version. Something like that. I say it like thatI see that you all had a nice long debate about whether or not there should be NTR in the love route and I'm glad that my game makes you react so much. As my previous messages must have been lost in the mass I'm going to redo one here in order to set things straight and make my point of view well known to all.
As many have pointed out, there will NEVER be NTR on the love path for two main reasons: Firstly because I don't want people looking for a sweet love story to have to dodge choices that would lead them to situations they didn't want but also because of the personality of the MC and Emilie. If you have started the love path, it means that you have made mostly kind and tender choices towards Emilie, that you care about her and want her to be happy. Moreover the MC is rather a dominant personality, and this even in love road, it would be incoherent at this moment to share her. As for Emilie, I saw a comment about her being able to cheat on the MC if he doesn't satisfy her often enough at night, her personality prevents that. The MC is everything to her, she has developed an obsession with him for years and even more so since she started living with him. It would never occur to her to cheat on him in this path.
As for the sharing route, which some say is too cruel in the beginning, as some have pointed out it's more pimping than sharing in the beginning. The MC is not in love with her if he makes this choice and sees her more as a way to solve his problems, so being gentle and kind to her would be inconsistent at this point. That's why I made the choice that it starts out rough but then the MC can develop feelings for her and decide to take care of her (if he wants, but if he don't, well... it can end badly for both of them), or even stop sharing her.
When I wrote the story of this game I tried to make something that would please as many people as possible by leaving as many options open and offering a nice variety of kinks/fetishes, but I'm working alone on this project and I can't create 10 different paths either. I also know that many people dodge my game because they see certain fetishes that repel them, even if they are dodgeable and it's unfortunate but I can't do much about it, if people don't read my dev notes I guess they are not made to play games where the majority of the gameplay is reading...
Well, I hope I answered all your questions and I'm going back to work on the next episode!
are you just so dense or are you unable to read? Maybe get someone else to look over that post, you quoted, again so he can explain it to you like you are five.NTR in the love patch, ok, no need. But a sharing with the two agreeing characters would be possible or an exchange of couple as at the beginning of the game, but more "consenting" version. There may be, even for other ideas, a "love" version with common agreement and another different harder version. Something like that. I say it like that
As long as in the end, you're happy with the result, keep it up, what you're doing is great
What are you talking about? My English is bad, but enough to express myself xD lmao
It has nothing to do with your English, but with our ability to absorb new information, it seems. The Dev themself explained why sharing or other NTR filth will not be part of the Love Route and why the Sharing Path is starting the way it is. If you don't like it, maybe stop playing?
The dev answered why there wont be any sharing in the love path, what is there so hard to understand about ?NTR in the love patch, ok, no need. But a sharing with the two agreeing characters would be possible or an exchange of couple as at the beginning of the game, but more "consenting" version. There may be, even for other ideas, a "love" version with common agreement and another different harder version. Something like that. I say it like that
As long as in the end, you're happy with the result, keep it up, what you're doing is great
I see where you are coming from and as I mentioned in an earlier post, I like the Love routes. But I have to disagree on this take on for the sharing route. Yes, there are full a... treating others like dirt if it helps them gaining their goals, but these are not all people.
Pardon me, but what is so hard to understand about my point? I do not want changes to the love routes, but you are forced to do choices to reach the sharing event choice, which are extremly one-sided and not logical for many. So I argue that the sharing choice is not bricked by having done a couple decent choices before! And the full "vanilla" players can still have only the choice to not accept. But some basic kindness choices should not completely negate the sharing choice, because that is not how it works in life!
