- Aug 1, 2022
- 2,229
- 7,385
Everyone is a piece of shit in this game...except my queen Lindsey of course
Ren'Py Another Chance [v1.49] [TimeWizardStudios]
- Thread starter Crazygamer43
- Start date
- Jan 7, 2020
- 471
- 567
Weren't you claiming that you "don't want to debate", while distorting what I said? Did you change your mind?
But let's bite it. We're talking about characters in a work of fiction; but yourself was the one bringing up "in a realistic context". Well, in a realistic context you do not have access to the thoughts of someone else, and yet you're defending a character based on their... "intentions".
Yeah, but apparently I'm the one disconnected from reality. And the Moon is made of green cheese, right.
It's easy to ignore the fact that she was considering to kill Spinach, to the point that she voiced it to the MC, right? Because it contradicts what you want to believe.
Because a person killed by accident is less dead than one killed by sadism, right?
Oh wait, Kate is not a murderer. Unlike Isabelle
The difference that you see is in Hell's pavement. It's intentions - something that not even Isabelle herself cares about (for different reasons that I don't), as shown by when she slaps Lindsey.
People should be not judged by "intenshuns", but by their impact on the world around them.
"Emotional management issues" is a cool way to justify "being a dumb fuck and causing harm towards the others."
If we're going to play this card - that it's fine for people to cause harm to others, as long as they have some "emotional reason" to do so - I'm pretty sure that we could explain Kate's behaviour based on her background. Perhaps daddy not giving her enough attention, or some other dumb shit.
But nooo, that should be only applied when convenient. Never in a fair and just way. Right? Rules for thee, not for me.
What you're calling "common sense" is "to justify harm based on esoteric shit like intentions". I'm not buying it.
A rapist, kidnapper, sadist (Kate) is a less worse person who also engages in sexual abuse, also locks someone against their will, also traumatises someone else (with the MC - the pig-ghost), also shows signs of sadism (against Spinach), and is a murderer
Yes.
You can try to justify your thoughts as much as you want friend, it won't change the fact that what you say makes no sense at all.
Let's summarize. In the end YOU still are claiming and defending that a person who rapes and enslave others ( Kate did that to 2 people, well, nearly 3 with the MC, the nurse and Isabelle ) for her own sadistic pleasure is a better human being than one who defends herself for having important stuff stolen from her.
Cause YES Lindsey DID steal the chocolate box, even if manipulated. But Isabelle can't guess that. Maxine DID steal her locker. But aight she's a monster because she pushed her in a locker and peed on her. (Is this the sexual abuse you're refering to ? If so... Well there's a clear bias of opposing this to tying someone innocent up, forcing them to act like a dog and using a strap on in their ass then their mouth) The fact that the locker slipped in the water wasn't intentional. And yes, despite you dismissing intentions characters have it is important. What is this reasoning ?? Go to court and tell the judges and lawyers that intentions aren't to be taken into account. That's why i said you're disconnected from reality. Once more, clear bias.
Again, the cat thing is not a valid argument at all but since you have none, you still have to use it. Spoiler, even if you side with her at the idea, she won't kill the cat. What ?? Someone could have overreacted out of anger and said bad things ?? Nah bro terrible person worse than the H
You are the definition of bias itself, not taking Kate's actions into account and acting like people should tend the other cheek when slapped. This is not how it works buddy.
Guys listen to this guy : If you rape, humiliate and debase people on a regular basis you're a better person than if you lock a thief in a locker and piss on them. I think this dude is sane. Definitely.
Still i'm curious why are you defending this idea. Better not overthink it, it's a porn thread after all.
Last edited:
- Jan 7, 2020
- 471
- 567
The character writing is indeed very good, the second best quality of the game after the drawings for me.
Still, there shouldn't be a debate on this precise matter. Sadly it's not really coming from the game events in themselves but rather from creepy ideas people are defending.
- Aug 12, 2023
- 123
- 262
If you have a hard time retrieving written information - as shown by the fact that you don't even know when people are talking about the stolen chocolate hearts or the stolen locker - perhaps I'm not the one to blame.
Wrooooong~
I'm attacking Isabelle but in no moment I defended Kate. Stop making shit up.
And in no moment I contradicted that.
I think that you really should improve your basic reading comprehension.
No, she can't "guess" that. But in no moment she questioned Lindsey to ask "why did you do this?" - she instead jumped at the gun, with her "IMMA GOING JUSTEEEEESSE", and slapped Lindsey. Acting without thinking, or without enough information to act, is itself immoral - it's how you get people harming each other while babbling "but my intenshuns were sooo good~ I should get a free pass to harm others!".
And killed her. By drowning. Oopsie, it's so convenient to not list it alongside the rest~
[As I said it was actually her homunculus, that is an attenuating factor; however Isabelle had no way to know it.]
The info that you're asking to be spoonfed is easily retrievable from the context.
It was still the consequence of her actions. She's still killing someone, regardless of her "intenshuns" or zodiacal sign or the name of her sister or any other irrelevancy.
If we had access to her thoughts, perhaps we could judge her based on her "intentions".
But that doesn't work here, with a first person narrator. Nor it would in real life unless you have a crystal ball to know someone else's intentions (or if you're a liar claiming to know them).
You're conflating morality with legality.
You don't even know what you're trying to debate. But yeah, I'm apparently I'm the one disconnected from reality... sure.
...anyway, since you brought legality up: in most countries she'd be still condemned. For example, in her native UK, it would be manslaughter. Her defendant could (and should) bring up the absence of malice in her actions to avoid elevating the crime to what's legally considered murder, but note that the difference is presence/absence of malice, not "intentions". Think on why.
Congrats for shooting your own foot. Twice.
It is because it shows that she's still willing to harm innocents in her pseudo-justice.
I do have arguments as shown over and over. Things don't magically stop existing because you want to pretend that you don't see them.
Refer to the above.
She is not just "overreacting out of anger and saying bad things". She is planning it.
["Since you brought legality up", part II: legally that's called premeditation. It is an aggravating factor behind crimes. Still, I'm discussing this from a moral point of view, not a legal one.]
A person who causes more harm to the others around them.Nah bro terrible person worse than the H
And we know how Kate turned out in the end. The MC mentions it (I think that it's at the start?)
Now you're just lying, given that I mentioned Kate's actions over and over and over.
Still "conveniently" omitting that she killed someone. Or planned to kill Spinach, even acknowledging her innocence. Riiiiiight. But I'm totally the one being biased~.
It's blatantly obvious that you don't even know what I'm defending. (Or what you're defending yourself.)
I'll spoonfeed it for you. I'm saying that:
1. People like Kate cause harm.
2. People like Isabelle cause MORE harm than people like Kate.
3. People should be considered "good" or "bad" based on the result of their actions, not on irrelevancies like intentions.
Have you ever considered that one of the joys of fiction is that you can experience things that never happened, and get to know people who don't exist?Better not overthink it, it's a porn thread after all.
That is why everyone is here - you can become a chad who fucks 9001 women by playing a game, you can follow your darkest fetishes (rape included) without actually harming someone else, you can even live what would never happen in real life.
Discussing what happens in a fictional work, including the morality of the characters - yes, even in a porn game! - only comes naturally from that.
Unless you think that those threads are better suited for "ANDRAID HWEN? WHY DEVELOPER ARE OF HATE PHONE USERS?" spam. ...I wouldn't be surprised if you do.
I rest my case.
Last edited:
- Jan 7, 2020
- 471
- 567
Such a condensed of bad faith, even the way you're writing smells the frustrated.If you have a hard time retrieving written information - as shown by the fact that you don't even know when people are talking about the stolen chocolate hearts or the stolen locker - perhaps I'm not the one to blame.
Wrooooong~
I'm attacking Isabelle but in no moment I defended Kate. Stop making shit up.
And in no moment I contradicted that.
I think that you really should improve your basic reading comprehension.
No, she can't "guess" that. But in no moment she questioned Lindsey to ask "why did you do this?" - she instead jumped at the gun, with her "IMMA GOING JUSTEEEEESSE", and slapped Lindsey. Acting without thinking, or without enough information to act, is itself immoral - it's how you get people harming each other while babbling "but my intenshuns were sooo good~ I should get a free pass to harm others!".
And killed her. By drowning. Oopsie, it's so convenient to not list it alongside the rest~
[As I said it was actually her homunculus, that is an attenuating factor; however Isabelle had no way to know it.]
The info that you're asking to be spoonfed is easily retrievable from the context.
It was still the consequence of her actions. She's still killing someone, regardless of her "intenshuns" or zodiacal sign or the name of her sister or any other irrelevancy.
If we had access to her thoughts, perhaps we could judge her based on her "intentions".
But that doesn't work here, with a first person narrator. Nor it would in real life unless you have a crystal ball to know someone else's intentions (or if you're a liar claiming to know them).
You're conflating morality with legality.
You don't even know what you're trying to debate. But yeah, I'm apparently I'm the one disconnected from reality... sure.
...anyway, since you brought legality up: in most countries she'd be still condemned. For example, in her native UK, it would be manslaughter. Her defendant could (and should) bring up the absence of malice in her actions to avoid elevating the crime to what's legally considered murder, but note that the difference is presence/absence of malice, not "intentions". Think on why.
Congrats for shooting your own foot. Twice.
It is because it shows that she's still willing to harm innocents in her pseudo-justice.
I do have arguments as shown over and over. Things don't magically stop existing because you want to pretend that you don't see them.
Refer to the above.
She is not just "overreacting out of anger and saying bad things". She is planning it.
["Since you brought legality up", part II: legally that's called premeditation. It is an aggravating factor behind crimes. Still, I'm discussing this from a moral point of view, not a legal one.]
A person who causes more harm to the others around them.
And we know how Kate turned out in the end. The MC mentions it (I think that it's at the start?)
Now you're just lying, given that I mentioned Kate's actions over and over and over.
Still "conveniently" omitting that she killed someone. Or planned to kill Spinach, even acknowledging her innocence. Riiiiiight. But I'm totally the one being biased~.
It's blatantly obvious that you don't even know what I'm defending. (Or what you're defending yourself.)
I'll spoonfeed it for you. I'm saying that:
1. People like Kate cause harm.
2. People like Isabelle cause MORE harm than people like Kate.
3. People should be considered "good" or "bad" based on the result of their actions, not on irrelevancies like intentions.
Have you ever considered that one of the joys of fiction is that you can experience things that never happened, and get to know people who don't exist?
That is why everyone is here - you can become a chad who fucks 9001 women by playing a game, you can follow your darkest fetishes (rape included) without actually harming someone else, you can even live what would never happen in real life.
Discussing what happens in a fictional work, including the morality of the characters - yes, even in a porn game! - only comes naturally from that.
Unless you think that those threads are better suited for "ANDRAID HWEN? WHY DEVELOPER ARE OF HATE PHONE USERS?" spam. ...I wouldn't be surprised if you do.
I rest my case.
Honestly, i'm not going through it when the first lines are either ad hominem or misunderstandings from your parts ( for example when you think i said you defended Kate, i said you defend the IDEA of her being a better person then isabelle. Or even when your dissociating legality with morals when these two concepts are obviously linked. You should really think about extenuating circumstances by the way but this concept might be too complex for you to understand )
Your only argument which holds any value is the fact Isabelle could have killed Maxine. Then, if tomorrow you fight with a guy who just snatched your phone out of your hands and you unfortunately kill him by pushing him or anyting that could happen, will you think of yourself lower than a rapist and a slaver ?
You clearly have a vision too limited of things, just taking the details which go your way. I'll stick to my first feeling of not going further now, nobody wants to read an essay with probably big flaws. I'll just end this by asking you a question, answer truthfully.
If you were forced to be with a person, would you rather chose :
- Someone who is used to humiliate, degrade, rape people for his entertainment on a regular basis. A big maniac.
- Someone with anger issues, who also can hurt you badly if you hurt him. But who helps people around him and says he wants to make the world a better place. Maybe not using the good means tho.
Hmm ?
Last edited:
- Jan 26, 2023
- 12
- 10
- Aug 12, 2023
- 123
- 262
Definitively not. They're planning four seasons for the game; one is complete, another is at the start.
At this rate you're simply grasping at straws, and can be safely brushed off as noise instead of someone actually discussing something.
It will be completed once my grandson has his heir.
I don't think anyone can think straight if someone stole their close relatives offering.
- Aug 12, 2023
- 123
- 262
Losing some rationality under strong emotions is natural, but she clearly overdoes it.
Indeed.But I think thats some kind of artistic exaggeration to let MC have more participation(you need to do more stuff than just tell her to calm down or tell her the truth without think about what could happen) and magnify her personality no matter good side or bad side. It is still a porn game afterall.
1.39 has been released
A Kate Quest
You must be registered to see the links
A Kate Quest
You must be registered to see the links
Lindsey, wtf
My first time seeing this, don't know how rare this sprite is, but I have never seen it on my previous playthrough, lol
My first time seeing this, don't know how rare this sprite is, but I have never seen it on my previous playthrough, lol
- Jul 1, 2022
- 1,240
- 3,503
Still no recovery for Lindsey..
Last edited:
- Jun 5, 2019
- 417
- 1,098
v1.39 changelog:
- Added Kate's Vicious Intrigue quest
- Added a Kate kissing Isabelle special scene
- Added a Kate looking down domineeringly special scene
- Added a Kate feet worship special scene
- Added a MC spanking special scene
- Added a Kate pegging special scene
- Added a location: Kate's Room
Need a hero for this update fr