- Apr 26, 2017
- 13,481
- 20,251
Since this game is going on steam, according to them, i wonder if it would be wise to not expect game versions being released on their patreon on a regular basis like what happens with Roundscape.
Thats great. the Only serious flaw in Roundscape was whenever the art would change from good to absolute crap. there was just no consistencyIt will have onlyYou must be registered to see the linksas artist.
But for how long until they decide to fall back into their old behavior? It doesn't look like they have learned anything from the past.It will have onlyYou must be registered to see the linksas artist.
Pretty much. Game is good but when some of the scenes that I could have drawn myself pop up it makes me cringe.Thats great. the Only serious flaw in Roundscape was whenever the art would change from good to absolute crap. there was just no consistency
The devs have made enough that they changed over their style from Roundscape. All of their art for this one is being done by one team I believe, so whatever assets they have now should be the same quality and style from start to finishGreat art, but seeing as it was made by the same dev as Roundscape is a huge disappointment. That game is a complete mess with all the different art styles and attempts to satisfy too many fetishes.
No offense but is it really explicit if the site they announced it on hasn't been updated in 2 fucking years? I mean the top of the page where you find that info still claims it's coming in 2017. Not to mention you have to scroll down to the bottom of the homepage to even click the button leading to that outdated info.They explicitly stated long agoYou must be registered to see the linksthat they're ditching the multiple-artist solution used in Roundscape. Gotta love all the peeps on this thread jumping to assumptions without a smidgen of homework or evidence to back it up...
Behold, the power of reading!Game has been in development for almost 2 years, I specifically remember them saying it was progressing in March 2017. How is it possible that a tech demo is all they have? What have they been doing this whole time?
No offense but schedules have no relevance whatsoever for the comical knee-jerking of "ermahgerd the art is gonna be bad and inconsistent cuz it was so in one other game they made reeeeeee", which arbitrary assumption I'd remind you is also entirely unsupported by the screenshots on display...No offense but is it really explicit if the site they announced it on hasn't been updated in 2 fucking years? I mean the top of the page where you find that info still claims it's coming in 2017. Not to mention you have to scroll down to the bottom of the homepage to even click the button leading to that outdated info.
Not a public post, so thanks for pasting it I guess. I'm still skeptical though, surely a tech demo is something you release 6 months into development? Especially if you're looking for feedback? Releasing 1% of the game, to me, seems pointless at best and a complete misrepresentation at worst.Behold, the power of reading!
You must be registered to see the links
Hey folks!
Today is a special day, you'll be able to get your hands on Arenus for the first time.
But, please keep in mind, that this is a Tech Demo. It's purpose is to test aspects of the game, this is not a real demo.
This Tech Demo only contains 1% of the content/Assets we've created for Arenus.
The Tech Demo consists of three aspects:
After you've completed the Tech Demo, please make sure to fill out the following survey to help us, making Arenus a better game.
- A Battle Test
- A Dialogue Test
- A Perfomance Test
Thank you for your help!
- Kaliyo
The site and info pertaining to the game being outdated by years is hardly a scheduling problem and I'm amazed you were able to interpret it as such. The selection of screenshots doesn't mean much when you consider Roundscape has a completely cohesive art style outside of the sex scenes and only 2 of the 5 shown here are actually pornographic. Also yeah "arbitrary assumption" after Ass Effect and Roundscape both had mixed art..lmao alright dude whatever you say.No offense but schedules have no relevance whatsoever for the comical knee-jerking of "ermahgerd the art is gonna be bad and inconsistent cuz it was so in one other game they made reeeeeee", which arbitrary assumption I'd remind you is also entirely unsupported by the screenshots on display...
You could just look at the Patreon page and see it only list one lead artist for this game. I don't see this assumption that they will do multiple artist if their Patreon page says differently.The site and info pertaining to the game being outdated by years is hardly a scheduling problem and I'm amazed you were able to interpret it as such. The selection of screenshots doesn't mean much when you consider Roundscape has a completely cohesive art style outside of the sex scenes and only 2 of the 5 shown here are actually pornographic. Also yeah "arbitrary assumption" after Ass Effect and Roundscape both had mixed art..lmao alright dude whatever you say.
It's not supposed to represent anything, it's a public test of the game systems especially the performance, Kal is using a lot of plugins and add-ons. And as seem in RS, there's only so much closed testing can do.Not a public post, so thanks for pasting it I guess. I'm still skeptical though, surely a tech demo is something you release 6 months into development? Especially if you're looking for feedback? Releasing 1% of the game, to me, seems pointless at best and a complete misrepresentation at worst.
You're literally the only one making it an issue LOL. My entire point is that there is no up to date information for non-patrons. I made that point specifically because you were complaining about people not reading a page that hasn't been touched since 2016. I'm not complaining about the predicted dates on the page, I'm saying the dates indicate the developers definitely don't maintain the page so how would people know about it?Would point out that the RSA screenies on the thread here are pretty up front about the art consistency thing which is conspicuously not on display here. But hey, why look at evidence when jumping to assumptions is so much easier?
And whatever timetable issues the devs may have is utterly irrelevant to this topic. Kindly drop that red herring already.
Opening post.You're literally the only one making it an issue LOL. My entire point is that there is no up to date information for non-patrons. I made that point specifically because you were complaining about people not reading a page that hasn't been touched since 2016. I'm not complaining about the predicted dates on the page, I'm saying the dates indicate the developers definitely don't maintain the page so how would people know about it?
You're literally the only one making it an issue LOL. My entire point is that there is no up to date information for non-patrons. I made that point specifically because you were complaining about people not reading a page that hasn't been touched since 2016. I'm not complaining about the predicted dates on the page, I'm saying the dates indicate the developers definitely don't maintain the page so how would people know about it?