- Jul 13, 2017
- 30
- 58
Microsoft Defender found trojan on the last version of this game. Be careful when you download it.
you are so late that it's beyond fashionable. it's false positive.Microsoft Defender found trojan on the last version of this game. Be careful when you download it.
I like that about this gameyep, Lara's cheating options seem to only be enabled with low relationship score.
Microsoft Defender is able to find "trojans" literally everywhere, including plain text *.txt filesMicrosoft Defender found trojan on the last version of this game. Be careful when you download it.
Blowjob is on Strict path if I'm not wrong as for Lara and Miranda blowjob scene you should be on Cuckqueen path (may work on swingers path not sure) and send John away.How to have Angelica blowjob instead of footjob in the photoshooting scene? Also how to have both Lara and Miranda blowjob in the massage scene?
Thanks! One more question; what about the two scenes before Angelica's anal in the fantasy scene? There are two images in front of that in the gallery that I couldn't unlock. Are they on the strict path as well?Blowjob is on Strict path if I'm not wrong as for Lara and Miranda blowjob scene you should be on Cuckqueen path (may work on swingers path not sure) and send John away.
I don't really remember two images (would help if you screenshot the scene from gallery you are referring to. I just deleted the game) but if they are the same variations than they are either on Strict path (Angelica's Pussy fantasy scene ) or Angelica's handjob scene.Thanks! One more question; what about the two scenes before Angelica's anal in the fantasy scene? There are two images in front of that in the gallery that I couldn't unlock. Are they on the strict path as well?
Can someone put in a spoiler on what kind of sexy time is there for angelica in the latest update?
What makes you say dev might abandon the project due to difficulty? The code in Babysitters is less convoluted than Babysitter, but that managed to be completed.Yep, sorry, I've just read the first line you have writen with the gallery unlocked...
But I think Scrappy, will need more time to update the mod, because the game is really poorly written and hard to maintain.
And I suspect the dev to abandon the project soon, due to the difficulty
Because the dev create double entry for each scene 1 for the game and 1 for the gallery with questions removed.What makes you say dev might abandon the project due to difficulty? The code in Babysitters is less convoluted than Babysitter, but that managed to be completed.
Yeah, I don't understand where that comes from either. Every update the dev add a new nuance, improved animation and the speaking bits among the newest. He improves his craft every update. The update cycle is what it is and the updates, when they come out, are content heavy (compared to most) and overall worth the wait. To speculate he's on the verge of abandonment makes no sense.What makes you say dev might abandon the project due to difficulty? The code in Babysitters is less convoluted than Babysitter, but that managed to be completed.
Sure, the gallery could have been handled differently, but it's not like it takes more than 5 minutes to copy-paste and edit out the conditionals for any one of the gallery scenes. And the file size is big because it's all in one script. For the most part that makes it easier to find your way to a new label/scene. I don't see how a single 2MB script is harder to manage than five ~400KB scripts.Because the dev create double entry for each scene 1 for the game and 1 for the gallery with questions removed.
It had multiple declaration which is totally unnecessary and slow down the game. Check the size of the script.rpy, which about more than 2 MB...
I want to see her get bent over by the pizza boy, pool boy, cable guy, mail man & of course the plumberHad misfortune of reading some of the comments about latest update and I gotta disagree with most of them. I actually found it appealing that Lara finally starts to admit she likes the boss or rather what he does to her. I guess if people initially fell in love with the "oh i hate that we do this, this is disgusting" they may feel disappointed, but to think it would be majority or at least loud minority was surprising. Anyways, my only critique would be that this update seemed to have quite a number of animations that we could do without. Not because they look bad, but it takes away from update release date and I'm sure many would rather get faster updates with beautiful still renders, than long awaited updates with lots of animations.
P.S. Lara being shared with neighbor - kinky couple play. Lara sleeping with the boss - just a career move. I am waiting when Lara will take a stray cock that does not help her in any way or is the wish of her husband, a cock purely for fun. True mark of a slut, respectfully...![]()
Usually better to just check:Sure, the gallery could have been handled differently, but it's not like it takes more than 5 minutes to copy-paste and edit out the conditionals for any one of the gallery scenes.
if not _in_replay:
. This way, you can use the same script without worrying about making mistakes with copy-pasta crap.It can become unwieldly having everything in one giant script. Having properly named .rpy files that breaks down events/scenes can be advantageous and the more organized approach can make it easier to find/fix issues.And the file size is big because it's all in one script. For the most part that makes it easier to find your way to a new label/scene. I don't see how a single 2MB script is harder to manage than five ~400KB scripts.
There is no need to do this. You just have to check if you are _in_replay and modify the script accordingly.Sure, the gallery could have been handled differently, but it's not like it takes more than 5 minutes to copy-paste and edit out the conditionals for any one of the gallery scenes. And the file size is big because it's all in one script. For the most part that makes it easier to find your way to a new label/scene. I don't see how a single 2MB script is harder to manage than five ~400KB scripts.
Usually better to just check:if not _in_replay:
. This way, you can use the same script without worrying about making mistakes with copy-pasta crap.
It can become unwieldly having everything in one giant script. Having properly named .rpy files that breaks down events/scenes can be advantageous and the more organized approach can make it easier to find/fix issues.
The size of the file, itself, doesn't matter in terms of Ren'Py's performance, since Ren'Py loads all .rpy files once you open the game, however.
Absolutely, there could be some improvements to the code, and believe me, I understand duplicating "code" is undesirable and bad practice in a professional production setting. My copy-paste rebuttal isn't a defense of the practice, but a suggestion that's it's not such an insurmountable problem to cause the dev to drop the game.There is no need to do this. You just have to check if you are _in_replay and modify the script accordingly.
Handling such a large file can become very difficult to maintain with identical names.
Time will tell us, if I have raison.