i understand, and this strategy (vanilla patreon front, kinky subscribestar back) has worked for some devs for some time, MrDots or drbones to name 2 from the top of my head. but they don't talk about the banned games in patreon ever, not even to say that they are banned. as far as they know, those games don't exist in that reality. they talk about them in discord, in their personal websites or here.
I though this was standard practice at this point, since the
Patreon purge. Just don't leave or state any refences of the subscribestar account like user name or context of use on other platforms or it may put the
Patreon account into "account review" status.
Rancies, Ziptiefun and pleanty other devoplers have had this happen to them or learned from it.
Patreon is not for games was never desgined nor its intendend use case for games; digital or otherwise it is by the excutives
own admittance during a court hearing they stated (parphraseing) "Our platform is for companies interested in designing of pyisical products seeking financial backing too implement the design and production then go to market with such products". Later when this excutive was ask on the defining of product priorities within the first sentence was stated "Games or gaming culture is not a priority".
Now lets say you go to doctor and he/she flatout stated your health is no concern to me and here take this and call me in two weeks, leaving the room.
What would you do, go back to that same doctor again?
"Stay Alone, Stay Alive" -
Martian Gothic: Unification