- Dec 16, 2022
- 668
- 2,363
Well, this is a clear distortion and falsification of facts on your part. There's a clear difference between mini-games outcomes and real choices which is given to player throughout the game. And those choices are separated between major and minor ones.Yes, DPC wrote about decisions. It is the player's decision whether he has turned off the mini-games, whether he lets the MC learn or whether the MC cheats. Think along these lines. They are the player's decisions.
Turning mini-games off doesn't prevent player from getting the same outcomes in compare with playing with mini-games on. It's so obvious... Cheating on regular classes only gives you a +1 DIK point and nothing more. It's not tracked in any way. Only major choice of cheating on midterms is tracked, cause this event have a particular variable, and it leads to a known consequences (one of 3). As a coincidence it was a major choice.
In short - turning mini-games off changing the gameplay style and speed, but doesn't change the story and the plot. It's almost the same as changing resolution or setting the volume of music.
I'm not ignoring it. But so far it brings mostly a cosmetic differences here and there. Well ok, it prevents MC from getting a lewd scene with Quinn. But... that scene changes really nothing, while MCs answer on Quinn's question changes a lot for her sub-branch in a perspective. Then it brings a couple of different renders and dialogue lines during date with Sage - even less significant. And I heavily doubt that it will change in the future. Even in case with such major and really important mini-game like mansion renovation. While our conversation started from tennis match... You suppose that the tennis match outcome is changing MC's past or what?DPC has already incorporated the results of mini-games into the story. Why are you ignoring that? Example: villa renovation. Can Rusty keep his car or not? This results in different stories in retrospect.
I'm not fixated on anything. I just trying to constantly remind you that game is not an abstract thing, it's a product which have a a lot of limitations in different directions due to game engine, programming as is, pryncipals of operation and development as well as developer view on it. The Season 1-2 is a finished product, period. Update at THIS moment is only possible to fix and adress some bug, but since no bugs were found for years already it's quite unprobable. And bug fixing updates are not equal to altering the plot and story or code itself ones, like by adding/modifying variables, etc. So, just accept that a bunch and set of variables transferred and remembered in the end of Season 2 are cemented till the game development is finished. DPC may change something in first two seasons after he will complete the whole game - would do a remaster, for example. You like to quote DPC, so find out some of his quotes about it too.You just don't understand it. DPC can twist and turn his story as he pleases. You are far too fixated on the existing code and forget that with every new EP, new lines of code are added that build on the older variables and can lead to completely different results in the story.
I know what example you're going to bring up now, but, firstly, current (3) season is still in development, and secondly, the feature that DPC added required the consistency. Some lewd scenes were forgotten and skipped, and he fixed it in episode 10. This is not a hint that anything can change spontanely in previous episodes and seasons. This was just a bug fix routine, which some interpreted in a wrong way (you). You see, if you as a developer indroduce feature like the "with whom MC get laid with" function - so that the player gets a kind of memo, then not indicating that the player had put his dick into Quinn is a bug, not a trick or an attempt to confuse the players. It's quite logical that such list would be used in situations like truth-drink-dare game with J&M in EP9. It's convinient and usefull. And it also adjusted a bit the Hell-week tasks capabilities and win/lose possibility for particular scenarios and requirements and players playstyle. Because situation when you have a Quinn in your "list" in the phone and when it's not counted when you tell truth to girls about how many your MC fucked before is strange and looks like a bug. But you continue to construct your deductions and theories even in such straight forwarded situations and circumstances. Did DPC altered in some way Season 1-2 because of it? Nope, he just fixed the bug for the previous episode (9) by introducing the new feature in episode 10 during the whole season 3 development process.
Haha! I knew it!As you yourself write, the MC may later talk to someone about it so that he won the tennis matches and this person then suddenly says to the MC that it is no surprise because he had tennis lessons in his childhood and was pretty good at playing. Well, Neil couldn't have afforded that.
Let's take the other side, so that the MC lost. This person then says that it's no surprise because Jill has years of practice and the MC just hit a few tennis balls against a wall because Neil couldn't afford the MC's tennis lessons.
Do you notice something? Your (won/lost) variables generated two different pasts for the MC. Oops.
As I mentioned above - current branching with LIs, their permutations and all accumulated choices throughout the game are quite enough, but you want/expect to add multi-branching based on multiple past of MC here as well. Good luck... Don't forget to get this idea to DPC and most of us won't see game finale due to death of old age
... not remembering details about something from the past makes a person dumb or what? I suppose that everything about Lynnette for Neil is a kind of memories that are painfull and the ones he want to forget rather than remember. While memories of his son is a different thing.Yes, you're right that the MC said in EP1 so that his father has a bad memory, but you forget that in EP10 the MC says that his father is the smartest person he knows. Neil also remembers well that the MC was a female ghost and other embarrassing situations. Ever thought about whether Neil intentionally has a bad memory when it comes to Lynette and her family because the MC shouldn't know all the details.
In EP10 the MC says that his father must have intentionally left out the detail about Lynette being naked.
Regarding naked... you suppose that Neil should shared such a details with MC about his mother? It would be kinda embarrassing even when mom is alive, and it's mostly inappropriate when she is dead for almost 2 decades. MC is reading Lynnette's diary where she describes all from her person perceptual and experience.