- Aug 4, 2020
- 3,506
- 19,695
a pussycologist i used to date (one would think it would be cheaper but noooooooooooo) explained to me that its connected with the babysitter culture where young boys still growing and not even realising they have a sexual drive watch older girls painting theit toe nails! something 4 to 7 year old boys with 12-15 year old girls, thats her entire explination for the foot fetish in the west!
I was a toddler (who here can say they were not - apologies if you were born a paraplegic and never got to toddle), but I never had a babysitter doing her nails in front of me. I definitely do not have a foot fetish.Oh nice theory from your pussycologist, but i think she is partially wrong, the foot fetish comme much sooner. Think about all those todlers who spent their whole life on their fours having only feets to look at. That's certainly the woman body part they saw the most, they look at them, they smell them. So later when they are grown up, that feet image is still deeply engraved in their mind. Momy wonderfull smelling feets so beautifully seated in highheels and nails painted in bright colors, versus the smelly daddy socks who have spend the whole day in tight shoes or worse in infamous putrid sneakers !!
I won't say feet disgust me, but I have zero interest in the foot job scenes. I just click them for completion.
I've given foot massages, but that was about giving a massage, not taking pleasure for myself.
So, due to my lack of babysitters doing their nails in front of my childhood self and the correlation of not having a foot fetish, vs having been a toddler and having seen many feet but still not having a foot fetish, I'm gonna say Warscared's pussycologist's theory holds more water for me.
Also, feet in high heels usually look shit to me. They are often cramped, the heel often looks slightly calloused... The silky smooth calves that lead to those feet, now that I get.