- Oct 20, 2019
- 1,767
- 10,133
Plot twist: Madame Rose is Jill's mom alter egoTrue , although I will remain cautious, since she does appear on the opening segments with the other strippers. But I do hope she is just an optional Troll character.
Plot twist: Madame Rose is Jill's mom alter egoTrue , although I will remain cautious, since she does appear on the opening segments with the other strippers. But I do hope she is just an optional Troll character.
DPC does not create a character for nothing.But don't you find it strange that she is very much a totally optional character then? How would an important turn of events like that fit in when it's absolutely possible to not meet her character in the first place?
I have the same doubts that Jumbi expressed. Even on most of my DIK runs I choose the nursing house, Madame stayed only in the most ancient saves and where 100% DIK choices.I repeat: sooner or later we will discover Madame's connection to BADIk's story, who she really is. and it is unlikely to be a pleasant surprise
LIME! You're back!Plot twist: Madame Rose is Jill's mom alter ego
Until I ask N7 for another banLIME! You're back!
DPC does not create a character for nothing.
if you're not in Jill's run you hardly know who Bianca (and all Jill's friends) is, yet still going forward she will find her importance.
Nora was only known to those who had seen her on the "tinder" but then everyone will meet her and she will be a teacher to everyone.
Madame will also have her role.
Dudes. What's with you and STDs? Stop giving that kind of ideas to the doc, please.
I can see your point but in this case it's a very thin argument. I mean think about it, if you lost to Derek, he refuse the price, the V.I.P ticket, even he refuse it, and you wont meet her in that case either, that's why I always believed She is rather a punshiment, may be for a potential STD for MC , but other than that I don't think she is anything more.
IRL Riona isFound real life Riona. View attachment 2653884
You take that back!Madame will also have her role.
Dude, He came up with it on his own . Trust me, if I would have wrote that Jill scene it would play out something like this.Dudes. What's with you and STDs? Stop giving that kind of ideas to the doc, please.
, well , obviously in my screenplay, Jill i s better character, something like this'sucking'
View attachment 2654426
the definition of "Just the tip"'sucking'
View attachment 2654426
And than sadly, you woke up and realised, well , obviously in my screenplay, Jill i s better character, something like this
Some would say Jill is a blue ball queen but that would mean she got it up
scene ep6_surprise68 with dissolve
mc "(I can think about that tomorrow.)"
mc "(I'm happy things are turning around for the better.)"
scene ep6_surprise70 with dissolve
$ renpy.pause(0.5)
scene ep6_surprise71 with dissolve
$ renpy.pause(0.5)
scene ep6_surprise72 with dissolve
$ renpy.pause(0.5)
scene ep6_surprise73 with dissolve
$ renpy.pause(0.5)
scene ep6_surprise70 with dissolve
I honestly think the first 2 photos are just voyeurism and exhibitionist camera angles respectively. The last four pics, That's just a classic example of pareidoliaPlayed AL and got PTSD? Well, here is some creepy shit in BADIK too. It could be an another bad joke / trolling, like how DPC is shitting players, which played AL before. But something tells me that it's not the case.
The only and one moment in AL which highlighted and revealed the fact, that somebody is watching for MC:
View attachment 2654529
We got all other evidences later, closer to the end of game.
There are 2 particular scenes in BADIK, which have only one such suspicious render in both of whole sequences. All is shown from "outside" and from distance, like somebody is watching:
View attachment 2654561 View attachment 2654562
Both times it's done like a somebody's sight through window. For scene posing terms and the point of distance - It's useless, because it's possible to move "camera" 2-3 feet forward and get a similar view and angle for the scene still, but w/o showing any windows.
And the most suspicious scene (imo) is this one:
View attachment 2654591 View attachment 2654593 View attachment 2654599 View attachment 2654601
MC returned to DIKs mansion from his home, celebrate his birthday with DIKs and then places his new phone on charge and goes to sleep.
Scene was made via showing us the sequence of renders above, there are no any dialogues, we have to click 5 times to get through it. The original images are too dark to examine anything on them, so I added some brightness in PS.
Script for this part:
We know that behind the MCs room windows is literally a backyard, some DIKs walks there from time to time, etc. But then it also have absolutely no sense to show all this in a such way and waste a 4 renders for it. If DPC would make an animation - it would be to suspicious and attract additional and unwanted attention. He preferred to make sequence of 4 renders which were dark enough to examine nothing in them.Code:scene ep6_surprise68 with dissolve mc "(I can think about that tomorrow.)" mc "(I'm happy things are turning around for the better.)" scene ep6_surprise70 with dissolve $ renpy.pause(0.5) scene ep6_surprise71 with dissolve $ renpy.pause(0.5) scene ep6_surprise72 with dissolve $ renpy.pause(0.5) scene ep6_surprise73 with dissolve $ renpy.pause(0.5) scene ep6_surprise70 with dissolve
I'm not agreeing that it definitely is someone... But it's a fact that's four different pictures. Ground lights clearly visible in the first one then a different light disappears/has something covering it in each pic. The light's aren't simply flickering off and on either as you can see the light still on while something is in front of it.I honestly think the first 2 photos are just voyeurism and exhibitionist camera angles respectively. The last four pics, That's just a classic example of pareidolia
seems like everyone agrees with cat hoodie, but I don't particularly like the pants. Dr.p should do a second round of 4 cat hoodie outfits with different pants.You must be registered to see the links
View attachment 2653592
The winning option gets featured in episode 10. Vote in the polls you're eligible for.
even if it was someone, it was probably just Jacob visiting his favorite TreeI'm not agreeing that it definitely is someone... But it's a fact that's four different pictures. Ground lights clearly visible in the first one then a different light disappears/has something covering it in each pic. The light's aren't simply flickering off and on either as you can see the light still on while something is in front of it.