Cool, thanks. Then I'll just continue like my first post, then upload a package when I'm done with this series.They like for you to use thumbnails for the most part.
Then upload the whole package in a rar or 7zip file.
Cool, thanks. Then I'll just continue like my first post, then upload a package when I'm done with this series.They like for you to use thumbnails for the most part.
Then upload the whole package in a rar or 7zip file.
yea i gave up getting the nutsac to look good. it was a pain in the ass (pun intended )I laughed so hard at that nutsac. Oh my god.
When quality is most important regardless of file size, PNG is the better choice over JPEG, which sacrifices accuracy for a smaller file. And if you need alpha channel transparency, PNG can do it but JPEG cannot.So, two questions. Does this community prefer PNG or JPG files?
How do I upload full-size images to the forum. I had been clicking Upload, then either Thumbnails or Fullsize reduces to 1600x960.
Thanks
I haven't thought about this since 08, but isn't the size more dependent on the dpi? I never worked in 3D, but there must be an equivalent there. I do know I use PNG for transparencies and when I convert to JPG they compress, but not that (50X) much.When quality is most important regardless of file size, PNG is the better choice over JPEG, which sacrifices accuracy for a smaller file. And if you need alpha channel transparency, PNG can do it but JPEG cannot.
But if it's important that the file be small, it can be surprising how good JPEG can look even at very small sizes. The PNG below is 1.4 MB. The JPEG is 26K. That's more than 50 times smaller.
PNG:
View attachment 22757
JPEG:
View attachment 22758
Both were cropped from the 4K original of this image:
View attachment 22772
Story: Kira and Alice invite Lisa to go with them on Friday night. She's trying on suitable dance club attire and walks into the bathroom to see it in the mirror, but the bathroom is already occupied by Max who doesn't mind at all. Lisa's heard the stories about Alice losing her panties on these Friday night excursions, and she figures she can't lose her panties if she's not wearing any at the start . . .
good story!! but too short broWhen quality is most important regardless of file size, PNG is the better choice over JPEG, which sacrifices accuracy for a smaller file. And if you need alpha channel transparency, PNG can do it but JPEG cannot.
But if it's important that the file be small, it can be surprising how good JPEG can look even at very small sizes. The PNG below is 1.4 MB. The JPEG is 26K. That's more than 50 times smaller.
PNG:
View attachment 22757
JPEG:
View attachment 22758
Both were cropped from the 4K original of this image:
View attachment 22772
Story: Kira and Alice invite Lisa to go with them on Friday night. She's trying on suitable dance club attire and walks into the bathroom to see it in the mirror, but the bathroom is already occupied by Max who doesn't mind at all. Lisa's heard the stories about Alice losing her panties on these Friday night excursions, and she figures she can't lose her panties if she's not wearing any at the start . . .
holly hell ! incredible !lisa gave some of the throbb to olivia , Then lookt fore max to have a little fun
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
DPI is the measure of pixel size but it is meaningless without also stating viewing distance. The smartwatch at the end of my arm has 300 DPI. The 40 foot wide electronic billboard on the side of the highway has maybe 1-2 DPI. Both have about the same number of pixels and can convey about the same amount of information. JPEG does make assumptions about pixel size and viewing distance so that it can bet on whether our pathetic human eyesight will be able to see where it is hiding the noise. The Find Edges filter in Photoshop reveals the loss.I haven't thought about this since 08, but isn't the size more dependent on the dpi? I never worked in 3D, but there must be an equivalent there. I do know I use PNG for transparencies and when I convert to JPG they compress, but not that (50X) much.
Levitation sex Kinky
Yeah I just realized that I posted an earlier render and I fixed the scene later. Is it something I just haven't learned yet or am I going to remain forever frustrated that Daz has no "Snap this fucking surface flush to that fucking surface, goddammit!" command?Levitation sex Kinky
Ann and Max! The subject have never been endDPI is the measure of pixel size but it is meaningless without also stating viewing distance. The smartwatch at the end of my arm has 300 DPI. The 40 foot wide electronic billboard on the side of the highway has maybe 1-2 DPI. Both have about the same number of pixels and can convey about the same amount of information. JPEG does make assumptions about pixel size and viewing distance so that it can bet on whether our pathetic human eyesight will be able to see where it is hiding the noise. The Find Edges filter in Photoshop reveals the loss.
PNG:
View attachment 22813
JPEG (quality 10):
View attachment 22814
Anyway, back on topic!
View attachment 22819
I'm not sure whether this fits in with the story of my previous renders of Ann helping prepare Max to deflower Lisa. Maybe this happens after that. Maybe Lisa already wants more.
4K version here.
You must be registered to see the links
You skewed the statement. In this paradigm we have a fixed 3D image being presented in a fixed 2D image, thus the alteration of distance is moot. The discussed factor was compression of image in multiple formats, not multiple distances.DPI is the measure of pixel size but it is meaningless without also stating viewing distance. The smartwatch at the end of my arm has 300 DPI. The 40 foot wide electronic billboard on the side of the highway has maybe 1-2 DPI. Both have about the same number of pixels and can convey about the same amount of information. JPEG does make assumptions about pixel size and viewing distance so that it can bet on whether our pathetic human eyesight will be able to see where it is hiding the noise. The Find Edges filter in Photoshop reveals the loss.
PNG:
View attachment 22813
JPEG (quality 10):
View attachment 22814
Anyway, back on topic!
View attachment 22819
I'm not sure whether this fits in with the story of my previous renders of Ann helping prepare Max to deflower Lisa. Maybe this happens after that. Maybe Lisa already wants more.
4K version here.
You must be registered to see the links
The fact that the original source has anything to do with 3D is also irrelevant. The bottom line is that the jpeg format was designed for the purpose of producing small file size. The png format was designed to retain maximum information.You skewed the statement. In this paradigm we have a fixed 3D image being presented in a fixed 2D image, thus the alteration of distance is moot. The discussed factor was compression of image in multiple formats, not multiple distances.
These are epic, my friend! Are you planning on Hi-Res releases or are these a WIP series project for you?So Max, you keep cuffing me and stuffing your cock in my mouth, so... Mmmmmph
View attachment 22961
Mmmmmm Continue
View attachment 22962
Oh Max, you have a magic tongue Thanks Lisa
View attachment 22963
Now this is the best one yet. :heartcoveredeyes:Oh Lisa, You Go Girl:heartcoveredeyes:So Max, you keep cuffing me and stuffing your cock in my mouth, so... Mmmmmph
View attachment 22961
Mmmmmm Continue
View attachment 22962
Oh Max, you have a magic tongue Thanks Lisa
View attachment 22963