Yes, the post has already corrected version. You can see the original with extra appendage in the OP.Or am I missing something and the picture I am referring to is already the corrected one?
Yes, the post has already corrected version. You can see the original with extra appendage in the OP.Or am I missing something and the picture I am referring to is already the corrected one?
"extra appendage in the OP" ... hmm.Yes, the post has already corrected version. You can see the original with extra appendage in the OP.
extra appendage in the OP ... hmm.
I don't get what you mean. Your OP? Ordo you mean the picture previous in the initial post? That's where I checked. It looks exactly the same. I don't see any difference.
Sorry if I opposed your message unfairly.
View attachment 2711182
Thing is, would people scrutinize pics this deeply for non-AI generated content? I would've probably let something like that pass and not noticed it if I was editing an illustrator's work. And from a porn consumer POV, I'd rarely look at any one image longer than a few seconds.
They wouldn't, but to be fair the content produced with other methods rarely comes with errors which would warrant such scrutiny -- you can generally trust/expect the artist to know the basics of anatomy (or for 3d renderer not to hallucinate things) even if they'll sometimes botch or exaggerate proportions and such.Thing is, would people scrutinize pics this deeply for non-AI generated content?
They all look identical... It's just farting out variations of the same images over and over again.Really nice AI generated pics. This looks very promising.
Sheesh, just how far AI-generated imagery has come in this short time frame!
I'm looking forward to this one to see more gorgeous girls, monsters, erotic interactions and a good story arch
stop ruining it...My OCD couldn't find any deeply unsettling inconsistencies with the CG's,
Except this lady had a flesh growth from her left wrist towards her butt, I fixed it for you. Feel free to use it in the game!
View attachment 2710526
I hope so, since they are all images of the girl.They all look identical... It's just farting out variations of the same images over and over again.
In fairness, when I saw that picture at a glance, I didn't see any issue with it. With the left thigh being forward and the knee being out of frame, I just assumed she was standing with her knee bent and foot hooked on the top of the bed, with the lace frill of the sleeve hiding the toes.Yes, the post has already corrected version. You can see the original with extra appendage in the OP.
The orange haired girl looks to have an eye for a belly button in her preview pic. Though it's admittedly subtler than a lot of times I see it do that.My OCD couldn't find any deeply unsettling inconsistencies with the CG's,