What render sites do you use? (Thinking of a site where I could put my renders :c)
Brothel King - Girl packs and Mods Collection
-
Thread starter
Kite80
- Start date
- Jun 3, 2019
- 68
- 67
Thats weird, because i downloaded the tool not a long time ago. And the link that you just posted isn't accessible without making an account, do you have an alternative link? Thanks btw.
For some unknown reason my bookmarks got deleted and mixed up, i haven't found all of em yet. I got this one tho.
You must be registered to see the links
It's one of the more quality sites that are around. It even features whole render girlpacks to download.
But i don't know if it's possible for you to upload your own renders on it. Feel free to take a look.
Last edited:
Make sure you delete the .rpyc in the game folder of the tagger. It can be that your version is up to date but it still uses the old .rpyc files. Had the same issue some time ago.
- Jun 3, 2019
- 68
- 67
How do the lesbian and bisexual tags work. Should everything that is tagged lesbian also be tagged bisexual?
From what I've been trying. You don't really have to use 'bis' tag if you already have 'lesbian', but that is because the moment you use 'lesbian' tag 'bisexual' is automatically searched for aswell (probably). I recommend you to use both 'bis' and 'lesbian' just to be safe.
I already posted this on the Brothel King Forum but I redid these packs of mine:
Little Caprice
Jia Lissa
Little Caprice
- Pics: 471
- Rating: A+
- Notes: Bk.ini included
- Link:
You must be registered to see the links
Jia Lissa
- Pics: 417
- Rating: C+
- Notes: Bk.ini included
- Link:
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
I 'm looking for some Toongirls. Can anybody help to find Pocahontas, Mulan, Jessica Rabbit, Cinderella and Rayla, Claudia from Dragonprince? Thanks a lot.
I don't think those have been done. Since I'm the main one who does the Disney girls, I'll add them to my TODO directory. That does not mean they'll be done right away, though. Maybe I can prioritize one. Of the first four you list, who would you most want to see?
As for the DP ones, I'll have to see if they have enough R34 material to make even a marginally good set. Last time I looked, which was admittedly a while back, they did not.
Many thanks, Leortha! I had a look on one of te R34-Sites, a few weeks ago, there were some pics more of the DP-Girls, than the time I looked before. Would be nice to see Jessica Rabbit first, but I don´t even know, if she is a Disney-Girl.
How does the wet tag work in conjunction with the "always wet" characteristic? I'm putting together a slime-girl pack and "always wet" seems appropriate.
New girl pack
Gabbie Carter
Gabbie Carter
- Pics: 508
- Rating: B+
- Notes: Bk.ini included, this one only started porn in the beginning of 2019 so there aren't that much videos of her online as a result there are almost no fetish pics
- Link:
You must be registered to see the links
"always wet" as in naughty mind, aroused enough to always have her pussy wet (I'm assuming).
It does not have anything to do with 'wet' tag.
'wet' tag is used only during advanced training. The girl is noteably covered in water or oil
You must be registered to see the links
New pack released.
Name: Jessica Rabbit
Universe: Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Pics: 654
Type: Western Animation
Notes: None
- Jun 3, 2019
- 68
- 67
Leortha
I haven't looked yet into your new pack, but the profile pic already shows the patreon/twitter signations, why don't you crop em out? I thought about this issue too, leaving the creators name in the pics is always a good way of automaticaly saucing players that are interested in the art, but it's also not quite pleasant to look at and a bit distracting.
Thats why i decided to always crop - or even - photoshop texts out of the pictures that are not contextual based.
What is your/y'all personal take on this?
I haven't looked yet into your new pack, but the profile pic already shows the patreon/twitter signations, why don't you crop em out? I thought about this issue too, leaving the creators name in the pics is always a good way of automaticaly saucing players that are interested in the art, but it's also not quite pleasant to look at and a bit distracting.
Thats why i decided to always crop - or even - photoshop texts out of the pictures that are not contextual based.
What is your/y'all personal take on this?
Given my packs are usually 100s of pics, that's a large amount of additional effort that I just do not see as likely to ever be something I do. Sorry.
While working on a new pack, I found a pic that worked perfectly into this question.
