Brothel King - Girl packs and Mods Collection
- Thread starter Kite80
- Start date
- Apr 17, 2020
- 13
- 3
Can anybody share a link for real girls in
These are all Mega
You must be registered to see the links
please?I cannot download from Mega……
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
These are all Mega
Could you upload the unconverted version of the pack? that is if you still have it.
- May 30, 2017
- 1,082
- 1,079
cacowang if you mean jpeg files instead of webp, I'm afraid I can't since original files are deleted during conversion, but you can reverse the process if you like, I used visipics software (it's free and easy to use)
eddiemumu you can download Leortha's RL girls packs
eddiemumu you can download Leortha's RL girls packs
You must be registered to see the links
, but for the other two mega links there's too much stuff to to this, try to ask respective pack makers directly to share them on mediafire
Last edited:
- Feb 21, 2020
- 159
- 178
All of this reminds me to ask... Why most of the Packmackers preffer Mega?
I know the simple answer might be "personal preference" but i wonder what other specific reasons you guys have.
I personally use Mediafire more cause it's easier to download from (Since it doesn't ask you for an account to download big/many files) and you can keep track of how many downloads your files get.
Nevertheless, i think Mega has bigger (Free) Capacity and you can upload "Preview Images" in your Pack's folder like Leortha does.
I know the simple answer might be "personal preference" but i wonder what other specific reasons you guys have.
I personally use Mediafire more cause it's easier to download from (Since it doesn't ask you for an account to download big/many files) and you can keep track of how many downloads your files get.
Nevertheless, i think Mega has bigger (Free) Capacity and you can upload "Preview Images" in your Pack's folder like Leortha does.
You listed some reasons. Another big one for Mega is the sync tool. I have a folder on my local system that is continuously synced with my Mega. I have it running all the time. So publishing a new pack is simply a matter of copying it into the appropriate spot on the local directory. Similarly changing up the directory structure is a matter of editing things locally. Within minutes or seconds the changes are reflected on the Mega. I also use the Mega regularly for downloading stuff. I just Import a copy to my own Mega (in a directory not accessible publicly) and the sync tool brings it down soon enough.
Because the Mega mirrors a local directory, if anything happens to the Mega I have a complete copy of it locally for recovery.
But likely the biggest reason is the simplest. It's where I started, it's what I'm used to, and with well over 200 packs the idea of building out the same uploads somewhere else is daunting.
- May 30, 2017
- 1,082
- 1,079
there are multiple options for cheating in the game under "?".
- Jul 17, 2019
- 2,295
- 964
Which is a PITA to access regularly, and lacks a lot of girl-specific functionality (changing stats, traits, fixations, etc). Power users can use the console, but not everybody is one.
The '?' cheats also disable achievements, if you care about those.
are we talking about cheating or modding? ur talking about modding. wasnt there a _bk.ini for that what u wanted to rewrite?
and are u talking about version 0.2 or 0.15b? so much questions.
and are u talking about version 0.2 or 0.15b? so much questions.
- Jul 17, 2019
- 2,295
- 964
Cheating, primarily. Modding can be used to cheat, but we're not discussing anything as advanced as that here (i.e. no changing satisfaction thresholds, group sex chances, farm training results, trainer effects, etc). Just the girls, MC and the brothel.
_BK.ini indeed controls a girl's stats, so you can slightly cheat that way. But the .ini files are still processed by the game, and the returns are not great. First, there is no guarantee you'll even find the girl whose .ini file you just changed. And second, there are clear limits to what you can accomplish that way (traits and personality are the strongest, I think, since you can set them to be non-random).
Cheating does not differ very much between 0.2 and 0.15b. Most of the underlying data structures are still the same, and can be changed in the same way. I figure MonkOne's trainer might even be straight up usable for 0.2.
_BK.ini indeed controls a girl's stats, so you can slightly cheat that way. But the .ini files are still processed by the game, and the returns are not great. First, there is no guarantee you'll even find the girl whose .ini file you just changed. And second, there are clear limits to what you can accomplish that way (traits and personality are the strongest, I think, since you can set them to be non-random).
Cheating does not differ very much between 0.2 and 0.15b. Most of the underlying data structures are still the same, and can be changed in the same way. I figure MonkOne's trainer might even be straight up usable for 0.2.
So.
I love this game, like i really love this game and i want to add my contribution on it. I did packs a month ago, and i wanted to do well. But obviously, making packs is a closed circle and i was insulted in the forum because, and i'm here to learn, that was mediocre. I was upset and i deleted the tool. But i'm note done yet... I want to share packs like i want to discover new packs....
I study the googledoc for beginners and i will create a new pack, because i want to.
Apparently, the problem is the"nude" tag, i will study that, don't hesitate to tell me what i don't understand.
Please, be nice, and please, don't be so rude against news arrivals.
PS : I'm not a native english speaker, so it's not easy to understand all the informations !
I love this game, like i really love this game and i want to add my contribution on it. I did packs a month ago, and i wanted to do well. But obviously, making packs is a closed circle and i was insulted in the forum because, and i'm here to learn, that was mediocre. I was upset and i deleted the tool. But i'm note done yet... I want to share packs like i want to discover new packs....
I study the googledoc for beginners and i will create a new pack, because i want to.
Apparently, the problem is the"nude" tag, i will study that, don't hesitate to tell me what i don't understand.
Please, be nice, and please, don't be so rude against news arrivals.
PS : I'm not a native english speaker, so it's not easy to understand all the informations !
- May 30, 2017
- 1,082
- 1,079
Wenth don't give up because of someone's harsh judgements, I was just like you when I started to follow BK and make my packs, learning ren'py from 0 (and still having a lot to learn) and figuring out how tags worked. Feel free to make your packs, choose characters you like, test your packs and don't be afraid to ask for advice ;-)
- Jul 17, 2019
- 2,295
- 964
When were you insulted? In private messages? Because all I can see from your public record is you inviting criticism and Leortha providing it, with nothing even vaguely insulting anywhere.
There was a brief (and non-flattering
) discussion of your ability as a pack maker on the other forum, but you did invite criticism yourself... If you can't take any, just state it outright and everyone will gladly ignore your mistakes. Maybe no-one will use your packs (for long), either, but that's the way it is with free content.As an aside, this also shows that making packs for BK is not a 'closed circle'. There are people who do that here, and there are others over at HHS, and the overlap is not too great.
The 'naked' tag is Leortha's personal pet peeve (and mine as well), but not everyone gets so worked up about it. That being said, it is still probably the most dangerous tag of all, and you'd do well to study Leortha's comments again.
- Sep 5, 2020
- 199
- 639
Really? I'm a fairly new pack maker and I haven't had a single person (other than Leortha) give any feedback, positive or negative. Not a single word. I don't really mind since I started making packs for myself, but I'm pretty curious how many people are using my packs, if any.
Let me try to write up my view of the "Naked" tag in one spot. I've said repeatedly that it is the single most complicated tag in the game. I will also note that there are some distinctly different viewpoints among the packmakers and outspoken game players as to exactly what level of nudity would qualify for the tag. So the following is just my opinion on the matter.
First I will note that one of the things that complicates the tag is that it works in three different ways given what other tags it is with. The three are 1) Normal use, 2)use with a sex act tag, and 3) use with a farm tag.
Naked is a modifier tag. It is meaningless by itself. Instead it is used to modify when the pic will appear given the other tags on the pic.
I'll start with the last, since the first is the most complicated.
3) For Farm use, Naked is effectively a sex act of it's own. The scary elf lady actively trains in enduring nakedness. (Group and Bisexual are also sex act tags when in farm settings) In this specific case it is not a modifier tag. "Beast Naked.jpg" is perfectly valid. Beast says it's a bestiality farm pic, and Naked says to use it in that setting for Naked training.
2) Outside of the farm, if any of the four core sex act tags are used, the game automatically acts as if the Naked tag is present, whether or not it actually is. End result for this is that "Naked Sex.jpg" and "Sex.jpg" will function identically in the game. The Naked tag is pointless and redundant in combination with any of the four sex act tags (Sex, Anal, Service, and Fetish)
1) Ignoring for the moment the issue of what level of nakedness qualifies for the Naked tag. For it's use, with some exceptions it means that the pic should be used when the game expects the girl to appear naked. This comes up in Nakedness training, but also once you reach the point of being able to tell the girl to stay naked all day or all the time. (Or she's a Naturist.)
I tend to, in my mind, work like there is a scale. Normal < Libido < Naked. Normal is regular pics. No tag for that. Libido is for pics that are getting a bit sexy, but she's not at the point of actually being naked. Finally Naked is for pics where she is showing herself. I'll note that the game makes a big deal about the effort it takes to get her to the point of being willing to show skin. Thus it's also a big deal to me to not have pics without the Naked tag when what is shown should not be happening in the context of the game. If she is waitressing while topless, that should be Naked, or the pic will get used at other times.
So, finally the issue of what qualifies as enough nakedness. And I'll say again, there are definitely some divided views on this issue. Ultimately, as a pack maker, you need to decide where you draw the line yourself.
For me, I tend to go by what was in the BK Name tool's tool-tips for a long time. If the image is showing tits, pussy, or asshole of the girl, it qualifies as Naked. Note that if tits are showing, but covered with thin cloth, I'll often tag Libido instead of Naked. Remember that Naked is about the state of mind of the girl. In that she's being sexy, but still is technically covered, even if nothing is left to the imagination.
First I will note that one of the things that complicates the tag is that it works in three different ways given what other tags it is with. The three are 1) Normal use, 2)use with a sex act tag, and 3) use with a farm tag.
Naked is a modifier tag. It is meaningless by itself. Instead it is used to modify when the pic will appear given the other tags on the pic.
I'll start with the last, since the first is the most complicated.
3) For Farm use, Naked is effectively a sex act of it's own. The scary elf lady actively trains in enduring nakedness. (Group and Bisexual are also sex act tags when in farm settings) In this specific case it is not a modifier tag. "Beast Naked.jpg" is perfectly valid. Beast says it's a bestiality farm pic, and Naked says to use it in that setting for Naked training.
2) Outside of the farm, if any of the four core sex act tags are used, the game automatically acts as if the Naked tag is present, whether or not it actually is. End result for this is that "Naked Sex.jpg" and "Sex.jpg" will function identically in the game. The Naked tag is pointless and redundant in combination with any of the four sex act tags (Sex, Anal, Service, and Fetish)
1) Ignoring for the moment the issue of what level of nakedness qualifies for the Naked tag. For it's use, with some exceptions it means that the pic should be used when the game expects the girl to appear naked. This comes up in Nakedness training, but also once you reach the point of being able to tell the girl to stay naked all day or all the time. (Or she's a Naturist.)
I tend to, in my mind, work like there is a scale. Normal < Libido < Naked. Normal is regular pics. No tag for that. Libido is for pics that are getting a bit sexy, but she's not at the point of actually being naked. Finally Naked is for pics where she is showing herself. I'll note that the game makes a big deal about the effort it takes to get her to the point of being willing to show skin. Thus it's also a big deal to me to not have pics without the Naked tag when what is shown should not be happening in the context of the game. If she is waitressing while topless, that should be Naked, or the pic will get used at other times.
So, finally the issue of what qualifies as enough nakedness. And I'll say again, there are definitely some divided views on this issue. Ultimately, as a pack maker, you need to decide where you draw the line yourself.
For me, I tend to go by what was in the BK Name tool's tool-tips for a long time. If the image is showing tits, pussy, or asshole of the girl, it qualifies as Naked. Note that if tits are showing, but covered with thin cloth, I'll often tag Libido instead of Naked. Remember that Naked is about the state of mind of the girl. In that she's being sexy, but still is technically covered, even if nothing is left to the imagination.
I think a big part of the reason people had issues before was not that you were making mistakes, but that you did not appear to be learning from the feedback you were given. You continued to make the same mistakes in additional packs. That is why people were dismissing your packs. If you were learning from your mistakes, that would not have happened.
The language issue gives some reasoning for that. But there is also a communication issue. Each bullet point I gave had meaning. Each was there to give you information of how to make your next pack better. If you don't understand a given point, say so! Please. You can see that I'm willing to type out walls of text. I (and likely others here) would be willing to work point by point through things to try to help you understand them.
I would suggest that you make another pack, submit it here, and I'll go through it again. And I'll again give a bullet-point list of issues. Then, as you read that list, give feedback to the feedback. If something does not make sense, ask about it. Then, when you think you understand the list of issues, go through your pack and fix them. Do not move on to another pack until you get a better understanding of the reasons people were critical of your pack.
I'm absolutely willing to put the time and effort into critiquing packs. But I do it out of a hope to ending up with more good pack makers. Previously it appeared like you were ignoring that critique and just moving forward. The language barrier can be tough. But this time let's try to work past that.
- Feb 21, 2020
- 159
- 178
Ok, i have been reading some heated discourse about the "Quality" for WebP conversion on the main BK forum.
And since i'm way more familiar here than there, i want to ask to the WebP users, what level of "Quality" do you preffer?
Here are the settings i was planning to use for my Haachama pack. (which uncompressed is right now over 1GB)
On other things, i will close my holopack poll tomorrow at 9:00am - PE time. (little more than 10 hours from now)
Last time reposting the poll, cause the winner so far is someone i cAn't post here:
Finally, any idea what tags could i give to these kind of images?
I was planning to give them the "Dirty" tag, specially since this kind of "dirty play" would fit with Haachama's cooking theme.
Same goes for any image that involve the use of food elements during foreplay/pre-sex.
The same question, but now for images that use Body Writing, like some "Public WC" images.
Which i think to go for some "public + sub" combination, but wonder what you guys recomend?
Oh, and i finished this small thing i was making for my packs releases.
That's all!
And since i'm way more familiar here than there, i want to ask to the WebP users, what level of "Quality" do you preffer?
Here are the settings i was planning to use for my Haachama pack. (which uncompressed is right now over 1GB)
On other things, i will close my holopack poll tomorrow at 9:00am - PE time. (little more than 10 hours from now)
Last time reposting the poll, cause the winner so far is someone i cAn't post here:
You must be registered to see the links
Finally, any idea what tags could i give to these kind of images?
I was planning to give them the "Dirty" tag, specially since this kind of "dirty play" would fit with Haachama's cooking theme.
Same goes for any image that involve the use of food elements during foreplay/pre-sex.
The same question, but now for images that use Body Writing, like some "Public WC" images.
Which i think to go for some "public + sub" combination, but wonder what you guys recomend?
Oh, and i finished this small thing i was making for my packs releases.
That's all!