Another college game, another sandbox, another AI description, another "5 stars because potential" review
wow
Fun how the spamming 5 star reviews are allowed on F95 from people who clearly either didn't play the project or are connected on a personal level to the Dev. Yet they nitpick anything that isn't gaslighting or ass kissing. You're not allowed to mention that something that walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... is a duck.
You want originality and creativity so much, feel free to make your own game and see how easy it is to work on something so seemingly trivial that's a hit-or-miss like porn games are. Won't complain too much about those two after the bills begin piling up and reality knocks on your front door coming to do her thing.
Lazy ass rebuttal. I would have more appreciate for this comment if it was indeed coming from a project that at least tried to be it's own entity versus the standard around here.
There's no wonder there's a shit ton of copycats out there. Quality wise some of these newer games are up to par but storywise we as a community have been stuck for years in the same place with the exception to a handful of Devs that at least try to challenge the status quo. Are people just supposed to ignore glaring similarities like: Characters that have striking similar traits to the ones of Badik? The fonts? The Secret renders and free roam elements?
Everyone is too busy trying to copy off the same test but the problem with that is the test they're copying from is barely a passing grade.
Slap a huge dick on a female character.. 5 stars!!!
Make a Male character aimlessly fuck anything that moves... 5 stars!!!
Make a guy a giant cuck... 5 stars!!!
And everyone who doesn't except should just make their own game. Got it!