MrBubu
Active Member
- Mar 31, 2022
- 654
- 4,747
- 350
Speaking from my experience with software open source, it's not because it's free that you are free to do what you want with it.
Everything comes with a license that explains what you are allowed to do and what are your obligations (if any).
If artlist specified in their license that they grant themselves the right to alter the condition of use at a later date retrospectively, they can.
If you think they have no right to do that you can fight them in court but is it worth it?
Free/open source is great, but you always have to beware of people that use it to gain popularity and then try to squeeze you.
Normally, at least with software, the license is packaged with it and should apply for perpetuity for that version. I have no idea about artlist, but if the developers can afford it, it would probably be preferable to pay and get a perpetual license with terms that cannot change.
Everything comes with a license that explains what you are allowed to do and what are your obligations (if any).
If artlist specified in their license that they grant themselves the right to alter the condition of use at a later date retrospectively, they can.
If you think they have no right to do that you can fight them in court but is it worth it?
Free/open source is great, but you always have to beware of people that use it to gain popularity and then try to squeeze you.
Normally, at least with software, the license is packaged with it and should apply for perpetuity for that version. I have no idea about artlist, but if the developers can afford it, it would probably be preferable to pay and get a perpetual license with terms that cannot change.