- Jan 5, 2023
- 1,446
- 3,602
I'd rather imagine Vanessa with a Whip in one hand and a Collar in the other. Would be a shame if Cleo fell deeper into debt to her.Just imagine Barbara whit a whip in her hands.
I'd rather imagine Vanessa with a Whip in one hand and a Collar in the other. Would be a shame if Cleo fell deeper into debt to her.Just imagine Barbara whit a whip in her hands.
Yes.... yes. A real, ahem. Shame. I wouldn't want to see that at all....I'd rather imagine Vanessa with a Whip in one hand and a Collar in the other. Would be a shame if Cleo fell deeper into debt to her.
That is the one downside for me with Vanessa, I'm not all that keen on findom. (financial domination)I'd rather imagine Vanessa with a Whip in one hand and a Collar in the other. Would be a shame if Cleo fell deeper into debt to her.
How the domination happens is completely up to Static, domination and can be a bit tricky without a good story and reason behind it. It can't be so absurd where no reasonable person wouldn't immediately go to the police. IT also has to be strong enough to get the MC to go along for at least awhile without to much resistance and they fall deeper into the Dom/blackmail. This is obviously a path that has been done before but if the writing is good and the heroine is great it is usually fun.That is the one downside for me with Vanessa, I'm not all that keen on findom. (financial domination)
I'll still really enjoy her content though, a plus sized curvy babe dominating a beauty like Cléo?
That is simply poetry in motion, though it would be perfect if Cléo was a stuck up bint.
Then it would be perfect punishment, but here, she is a beautiful kind hearted woman, dreaming of becoming a dancer. Vanessa is the bitch, and that makes things deliciously interesting.
Poo I am out of REACTIONS for today! So just imagine a series of hearts below that post lol.Eheh you'll see what a bitch Vanessa can be in the next update (snapshot.2).
you can disable themLooks like an interesting game, good luck to the Dev. Not for me though with the minigames.
thanks, I will make Gwen submissive for my gamesGwen is the best candidate for this kind of approach so far.
you can find the roadmap on subscribestarIs the update comin soon?
I don't have a Subscribestar account.you can find the roadmap on subscribestar
Ok, let’s talk about something called semantic versioning because it’s clear almost nobody knows what those numbers really mean.I'm sorry, how is the game in version 1+ and has this atrocious system with white text on white backgrounds when you can't see letters?
Is it possible to increase the size of the dialogue fonts? Currently, it is too small to read.Ok, let’s talk about something called semantic versioning because it’s clear almost nobody knows what those numbers really mean.
Semantic versioning is a way to version your project by using 3 sets of numbers:
- major (you can relate this number to the edition of a project. It’s like saying Lord of the rings 1, 2 or 3. It starts from 1, not 0)
- minor (you can think of it as the update number which is incremental but it’s allowed, if needed, to skip numbers if a particular release contains multiple updates. It starts from 0)
- bug fixing (you release a project, there’s a bug, you fix it, this number increases by one. it starts from 0.)
- snapshots (it’s a release of your project which is not yet finalized (so you can’t increase your minor number) but represents a “snapshot” of your project at a specific moment of your development.
That explains CleoTorresTheDanceOfLife-1.1.0-snapshot.2
When you see things like 0.18 just know that it doesn’t make any sense.
With that being said, since I’m always open to suggestions I’ll think about adding a dark background to the text as an option to toggle in the game settings, hoping this soul who experienced such atrocious reading experience will find some relief.
Regards,
SFA
Okay, but we have some standarts here, as you might have noticed. Most of the games here use another versioning. That's why it confuses everybody.Ok, let’s talk about something called semantic versioning because it’s clear almost nobody knows what those numbers really mean.