- Apr 8, 2019
- 107
- 120
It's just me or there are some lines that repeat themselves in this update? And some are abrupt, like you're getting off museum that you sudden appears at the bar.
Cause if you look at his discord/patreon, how he words things, it's a team not a 1 man show. He doesn't even know the answer to questions about specific parts of game cause he isn't the one writing the story lolPretty sure I've already expressed my own theory on that a while back when the pre-release hype sale pitches started really ramping themselves up and reading more like an always exagerrated late night infomercial.
Just because a developer making one of these games throws up a "donate more money" goal and reaches it doesn't mean they actually end up fully following through on what was promised. Especially on things you typically have to take them on their word with after-the-fact. More then anything else that all came across to me as a (smart) guy playing out the standard patreon game aiming to milk more money into his mostly one man show minus some outside freebie cut costs contributions, and nothing I've seen in the development as a whole since then has done much to change that perception belief that he essentially did more there then sell people a "team" concept idea
I would really recommend u to play the update, before giving ur analysis of it.And yeah, tomatoe or tomato or however you want to present it on the anti mc stuff. Point was I don't need to play the latest update to already rationally conclude that the point to any such character this dev added was to indeed create internal game drama. That people like you with that tendency to throw around terms like 'ruining characters" here and while being trigger happy with those facepalm emotes are so worked up about it also just further rationally suggests he accomplished his underlying goal there. Especially when I'm pretty sure he at one point already generally eluded to the possibility of such in early development as one of the "real world aimed" ways he wanted his game to be and play different. Whether that goal is something that personally appeals to *you* or I specifically,......again, the bottlom line point there was that he doesn't care one iota about the posted outrage on the job he did with that or your facepalm emojis here. They hold no power or influence over his game.
Cause if you look at his discord/patreon, how he words things, it's a team not a 1 man show. He doesn't even know the answer to questions about specific parts of game cause he isn't the one writing the story lol
he's just the guy who's name is plastered on the game, that's all
even if it's not a team and it's just him, what difference does it make? the game has been trash since act 2 started. all he's interested in is making marketing vids to continue milking patreons
I might make a guide if I cba for an optimal "bang everyone" path cause you guys all seem to have multiple playthrough's for different characters. Yet I managed to get every scene in the game in one run apart from (Riley Prom) (Amber Prom) which weren't accessible due to choosing Chloe and one other (Riley Sex Scene) but still sleeping with her. Only other scene I didn't get was (Samantha First Scene) in Act 3 due to her being Gorilla exclusive.For the life of me I can't seem to get the 3 Amber scenes. Anyone know Amber's route? Searched in the thread and didn't see one.
The fact he's called "Charli" and not "Charlie" tells you everything you need to know about himMan there's a lot of schizophrenic hoes......I mean love interests in this game.
And Charli should stop pretending to be gay.....not cool bro.
If you've actually played the game and actually paid 2 seconds to the words others are writing, you would've know the issue isn't the existence of an antagonist, hell drama is sometimes needed to avoid monotony, the issue is the out of character immediate reaction of your supposed LIs and friends to this guy's speeches. In a game like this, this twist out of nowhere takes the logic and immersion out of the window."I don't need to play the latest update to already rationally conclude that the point to any such character this dev added was to indeed create internal game drama."
Terms like "ruining characters" are thrown because issues you don't seem to know because as you wrote before you didn't play the episode before criticizing others here. The character development doesn't match the actions of a lot of the girls around MC after spending minutes with the out of nowhere new antagonist with plot powered jedi mind tricks. Plus the story nerfs the MC who was already slapping respect back into people for way less than this. There's just 2 girls as far as I know that openly tells the MC they don't fall for Charli's BS (Lauren and Nora) and Lauren even tells the MC about Charli's MO. He sweet talks the girl and act charming, then switches to bashing MC's name and reputation. So this makes players realize this friends of MC for sometime by now also got this BS speech and still defends Charli when MC is skeptical about him. That's kinda fucked up.That people like you with that tendency to throw around terms like 'ruining characters" here and while being trigger happy with those facepalm emotes are so worked up about it
Yet, you seem to care a lot, even mentioning the damn facepalms twice. Again, criticism during a game in the making is as good or as bad as the dev wants to take it. Personally; when behind the criticism there's reasons pointed out and way more than one person mentioning the same points as an issue, I think is with the best intentions possible. Does they "sound" harsh or rude? Maybe it's tough love. The people criticizing are usually the ones who want the game to be great the most."he doesn't care one iota about the posted outrage on the job he did with that or your facepalm emojis here."
Helped a lot dude thanksIf you already have a previous version, rename your game folder to "CollegeKings-11.0.1-pc"
Now open your torrent client and indicate path where you named the folder.
It will recheck and download the missing files.
Didn't you understand? ignore it if you didn't understand my explanation above and lower it completely.
Game is already extracted in case someone wants to do my explanation above, to avoid downloading the 17.1GB
I'm seed for the first 24 hours.
Download:
You must be registered to see the links
I pointed out the facepalm thing to him specifically because that's a core part of his and others common complaints routine here, and as an underlining acknowledgement that the whole process in which they present such distaste here essentially amounts to a meaningless effect one that at this point shouldn't even be worth their expended emotional energy on. If anything and from my own personal point of view on that I actually tend to take a no facepalm emoji out of a reply I aimed at people who do that as more a failure to adequately get my counter point across I don't expect them to likeIf you've actually played the game and actually paid 2 seconds to the words others are writing, you would've know the issue isn't the existence of an antagonist, hell drama is sometimes needed to avoid monotony, the issue is the out of character immediate reaction of your supposed LIs and friends to this guy's speeches. In a game like this, this twist out of nowhere takes the logic and immersion out of the window.
Terms like "ruining characters" are thrown because issues you don't seem to know because as you wrote before you didn't play the episode before criticizing others here. The character development doesn't match the actions of a lot of the girls around MC after spending minutes with the out of nowhere new antagonist with plot powered jedi mind tricks. Plus the story nerfs the MC who was already slapping respect back into people for way less than this. There's just 2 girls as far as I know that openly tells the MC they don't fall for Charli's BS (Lauren and Nora) and Lauren even tells the MC about Charli's MO. He sweet talks the girl and act charming, then switches to bashing MC's name and reputation. So this makes players realize this friends of MC for sometime by now also got this BS speech and still defends Charli when MC is skeptical about him. That's kinda fucked up.
I won't comment much about the facepalm thing, you seem to be triggered about that to even mention it, unless you lose "forum point" for facepalms or whatever and that would be new to me. About the "writer accomplishment of his underlying goal", again; the issue never was the antagonism happening, but the way it's happening. It breaks what we knew by far about a lot of characters. This may be what Dev wanted, but as an open to discussion forum, everybody can write what they think about it. If I was a dev I would check at least portions of the comments even if I find them against my story. Everybody screw up sometimes. Not so far ago, even the "not to be mentioned here", the "Voldemort" game's dev had to fix a fuck up because after feedback it was clear that move wasn't the best option and made no sense story wise.
Yet, you seem to care a lot, even mentioning the damn facepalms twice. Again, criticism during a game in the making is as good or as bad as the dev wants to take it. Personally; when behind the criticism there's reasons pointed out and way more than one person mentioning the same points as an issue, I think is with the best intentions possible. Does they "sound" harsh or rude? Maybe it's tough love. The people criticizing are usually the ones who want the game to be great the most.
If the larger scale of player base was happy with the game, why were there like 3+ marketing vids that talked about why CK team learned from their mistakes in Act 2 and the next update is gonna be amazing?If the rest of what you wrote there is your way to try and salvage yourself out of what was a blatantly flawed and terrible choice of game examples you tried to use and apply as supporting logic within your clearly intended insinuation that College Kings better somehow "be mindful of the f95 backlash"...I was good with letting you have that last word win if you really want or need it btw. It's why I didn't bother to reply your initial post to me in the first place. Since again there wouldn't be much more to say there on my end then again pointing out that you seemingly are having a hard time comprehending that a subsection of people making a lot of repetitive post dislike noise here about things that "ruin characters" is typically a poor and fairly misleading representation of any "mountain" that actually matters within a game like College King's larger scale paying player base and/or meaningful financial structure. Subtract that out and I have zero issues with you ripping the game here over your own personal dislikes of it or it's recent content inclusions.
"because that's a core part of his and others common complaints routine here"I pointed out the facepalm thing to him specifically because that's a core part of his and others common complaints routine here, and as an underlining acknowledgement that the whole process in which they present such distaste here essentially amounts to a meaningless effect one that at this point shouldn't even be worth their expended emotional energy on. If anything and from my own personal point of view on that I actually tend to take a no facepalm emoji out of a reply I aimed at people who do that as more a failure to adequately get my counter point across I don't expect them to like
If the rest of what you wrote there is your way to try and salvage yourself out of what was a blatantly flawed and terrible choice of game examples you tried to use and apply as supporting logic within your clearly intended insinuation that College Kings better somehow "be mindful of the f95 backlash"...I was good with letting you have that last word win if you really want or need it btw. It's why I didn't bother to reply your initial post to me in the first place. Since again there wouldn't be much more to say there on my end then again pointing out that you seemingly are having a hard time comprehending that a subsection of people making a lot of repetitive post dislike noise here about things that "ruin characters" is typically a poor and fairly misleading representation of any "mountain" that actually matters within a game like College King's larger scale paying player base and/or meaningful financial structure. Subtract that out and I have zero issues with you ripping the game here over your own personal dislikes of it or it's recent content inclusions.
There really is no *if* there. At least among those without an underlying need here to talk themselves into believing some narrative that his patreon totals and game sales keep going up based on their own desired conclusion instead of what is easily the most logical one on the table. Which on that note I believe those patreon subs even went up another couple of hundred since I last checked a day or 2 ago before even starting this post release discussion with you guys continually pointing out how much he ruined the game with it. But yeah....*THAT* is clearly what you expect to see happening when the larger scale player base isn't happy with the game, right?If the larger scale of player base was happy with the game, why were there like 3+ marketing vids that talked about why CK team learned from their mistakes in Act 2 and the next update is gonna be amazing?