Recommending Complete Netorase & Sharing Games Master List
- Thread starter zetsupetsu
- Start date
- Mar 30, 2019
- 67
- 138
I played and read most of the games and novels I found in the comment section, the netorase contents aren't a lot, and for us who are fans is kind of annoying seeing most games are ntr, how many times any of us played games or read manga start netorase and then ended in ntr. It piss me off, so please is there any new or old novel, manga or game that is pure netorase
where the couple still in a loving relationship.
where the couple still in a loving relationship.
Netorare Sankaku Kankei ~Hatsukoi no Osananajimi ga Sefure ni Sareta~
Its about a group of trio best friends. The girl is a sexfriend with the other guy behind MC's back, so it kinda starts as a netorare? The MC catches the two of them in the act but joins in later for threesome. Eventually the MC confesses to the girl that he is in love with her all this time and turns out the feeling is actually mutual. Both of them become a couple but the girl is still sex friend with the other guy with mc's consent.
Its kinda netorase-ish I guess? Its only for a little bit just before the end of the game and we dont even get to see it. In the last scene, the girl visits the MC immedieatly after she banged the other guy and the MC finds it hot. He is aroused by her being a yariman and enjoys listening to her past experiences.
The game is a nukige and there are only two options, each leads to good or bad ending.
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
- Jul 5, 2017
- 181
- 170
There's one more wrinkle about the (lack of) communication between MC and Marina that Part 3 centers around that makes the cast of the Marina series especially compelling to me.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I still wish we got to see more of Marina's sadistic side because I felt like she had the perfect level of playful "cruelty" for her husband.
The only one i know of is the old man route in adelaide inn 2.
Could you list the ones you know of?
- Dec 24, 2020
- 450
- 1,034
The Old Man route in adelaide inn is perhaps one of my least favorites. It doesn't really make sense and something about the dynamic is really off putting to me. I think I would have preffered them messing with a younger , less likely to die, couple
- Feb 10, 2018
- 272
- 155
- Jun 2, 2018
- 1,413
- 5,203
Mods being trash that is why.
- Jun 12, 2017
- 745
- 1,290
Cause shota. If you don't think there is a kid in that porn game you are more than welcome to send mods a message.
- Jun 2, 2018
- 1,413
- 5,203
- Jul 24, 2018
- 443
- 1,567
In this thread there is a discussion about it. It appears to be deleted because of the size and supposedly likeness to a child a certain character has, the moderator said that the game was taken off because people reported it. Now, I'm no hardcore conspiracy theorist but it's very likely that people reported the game just because they don't like NTR.
I have played all completed NTRMAN games and I can say that as far as I'm aware, in Adelaide Inn, there are no children or even overly child-like characters engaging in sexual activity. The "shota" is the noble boy which I have talked about in my post on that thread, he seems to be a crossover character and in the game "The Queen and the Goblin" he states his age if I'm not mistaken, in Adelaide Inn he again says he is an adult multiple times. The character himself said he isn't a kid on more than one instance, he schemes to get what he wants and clearly doesn't talk like a child, what makes him different than a dwarf or a goblin since all of those have short stature? This is the kind of nuance you don't get by examining CG alone.
Personally, I think it shouldn't matter at all since it's all cartoon drawings and a bunch of code to begin with but even so the site ADM's shouldn't be worried about it bringing trouble to the site, despite being in two(?) games this character in particular isn't the focus of the entire game, there are also far more in-your-face content to go after than Adelaide Inn. The game truly phases in and out of existence here.
- Jun 12, 2017
- 745
- 1,290
Just because you have a character say "I'm an adult" it doesn't make him one.
It's more specifically about "Content (a game, image, video, story, animation, etc.) depicting nudity or sexualization or sexual/erotic activity involving prepubescent character(s) is prohibited. A "prepubescent character" is one that visually shows no sign of puberty, or if non-visual is otherwise clearly intended to represent a prepubescent character. 2D and 'unrealistic' depictions are generally looked upon more favorably. As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member."
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
As for why there is rule 7 exists refer to this post by staff
- Jun 2, 2018
- 1,413
- 5,203
1 - Equating anime drawings to pedo shit is dumb.
2 - The mods reasoning makes no sense either whatsoever as there are plenty of undesirables on this site already as well as the fact that this site breaks so many laws already that pretending removing anime style drawings and saying it's for the survival is just a joke at this point. It WOULD be sensible if it was just concerning 3d games and such (or in the very rare case a game that actually tries to draw in an actual realistic looking child in 2d that cannot be distinguished from a real one). As 3d games tend to be leaning towards the more realistic looking side (or at least attempts to). Frankly though even then shit like koikatsu and custom maid don't look realistic at all. Rule 7 just needs a rework for it to be banning only games and content whose goal is to look like real life children. An example would be shit like a daz game that does it as that types of renders tends to go for a more "human like" approach. At the end of the day lumping in anime style shit is just dumb and keeping plenty of good games out of the site and it's cringe to say the least.
3 - Also Let's not forget the plenty of rape, torture and many other "problematic fetishs" on this site. As well as the fact that its a fucking pirate site in the first place lmao.
- Jul 24, 2018
- 443
- 1,567
I don't want to buy a fight with you or an army of mods, especially since this thread isn't about discussions on Rule 7, however, I can't leave this unanswered. It will be my first and last reply.
There is another character, "The Quarterling", which is also quite short, shorter than the noble in fact. Is The Quarterling depicting a prepubescent character? He is a fantasy character from another race so it gives license to say that his race stays the same size throughout their whole lives. If he claims to be an adult, does it make him one? The Quarterling doesn't state his age after all.
If the noble, a fictitious character, in a fantasy world, says he is an adult, does it make him one? If a vampire loli claims that she is a thousand years old, does it make her truly a thousand years old? It may sound a little stupid to discuss this and that's because it IS stupid to discuss this in the first place. You can't possibly know for sure outside of what the author tells you, they aren't real people after all. Are you really going to impose your judgement upon other's character?
" Rule 7 is about REALISTIC depictions of PREPUBESCENT children. This is neither about drawn stuff, like Insexual Awakening, nor about young teens or anything. If we remove Rule 7 it will open up the forum to the posting of straight-up Child-Pornography and when that happens, this site won't be here for long. "
So let me get this straight, Insexual Awakening where the protagonist, his little sister, and his cousin are teenagers at best is ok because it's drawn porn and it's not realistic at all but somehow Adelaide Inn which is also drawn, is a game set in a fantasy world, with fantasy races, with characters that you can completely skip is somehow unacceptable? Right. Some 3D games here heavily violate this rule seeing as they are the closest to being realistic or semi-realistic, what about the game "Tessa"? "Parental Love"? "23 Sisters"? The game "But I'm the Bad Guy" clearly depicts the little girl, the daughter of the couple as being not only short but also having the behaviors of a child. But of course, all of those games can simply have the characters say that they are 18 anyway
.
I'm really sorry but the answer: "As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member" simply doesn't go well, it absolutely feels like the decision is coming from the whims of some staff member.
As my final point I have to say that this rule is extremely arbitrary when it comes to 2D. The users are at the complete mercy of staff, when their favorite game gets thrown off the site they get understandably angry and take it up to the forums to talk about it and what happens? Mods often delete or edit comments as it's not the user's decision to make. It's cool that the mods help keep the site up and running but there is a very real reason why this rule in specific is polemic.
This is a very curious thing to say indeed.
There is another character, "The Quarterling", which is also quite short, shorter than the noble in fact. Is The Quarterling depicting a prepubescent character? He is a fantasy character from another race so it gives license to say that his race stays the same size throughout their whole lives. If he claims to be an adult, does it make him one? The Quarterling doesn't state his age after all.
If the noble, a fictitious character, in a fantasy world, says he is an adult, does it make him one? If a vampire loli claims that she is a thousand years old, does it make her truly a thousand years old? It may sound a little stupid to discuss this and that's because it IS stupid to discuss this in the first place. You can't possibly know for sure outside of what the author tells you, they aren't real people after all. Are you really going to impose your judgement upon other's character?
Now, even IF the noble boy or other similar characters really are children, which I truly honestly doubt, there is the issue that the execution of the rule is still arbitrary, not consistent at all. The post you linked explains the reasons why the rules are in place and I agree with them, the thing though is that just below the post you linked Sam and Oiz are explaining why Vitamin Quest and Insexual Awakening aren't flagged by Rule 7. This is what's written in the thread you posted:
" Rule 7 is about REALISTIC depictions of PREPUBESCENT children. This is neither about drawn stuff, like Insexual Awakening, nor about young teens or anything. If we remove Rule 7 it will open up the forum to the posting of straight-up Child-Pornography and when that happens, this site won't be here for long. "
So let me get this straight, Insexual Awakening where the protagonist, his little sister, and his cousin are teenagers at best is ok because it's drawn porn and it's not realistic at all but somehow Adelaide Inn which is also drawn, is a game set in a fantasy world, with fantasy races, with characters that you can completely skip is somehow unacceptable? Right. Some 3D games here heavily violate this rule seeing as they are the closest to being realistic or semi-realistic, what about the game "Tessa"? "Parental Love"? "23 Sisters"? The game "But I'm the Bad Guy" clearly depicts the little girl, the daughter of the couple as being not only short but also having the behaviors of a child. But of course, all of those games can simply have the characters say that they are 18 anyway
.I'm really sorry but the answer: "As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member" simply doesn't go well, it absolutely feels like the decision is coming from the whims of some staff member.
These are made up added offenses. First of all, you don't apply rules for developers themselves unless they did some really unforgivable, atrocious stuff. You apply rules for projects, a case-by-case judgement. Should a game be removed just because a dev previously included content in some OTHER project? No, it's not fair at all. I get it, maybe you don't like this type of content, maybe you have to give the diplomatic answer, that's ok. I'm not your typical Rule 7 complainer either, in fact I care more about NTRS, but that's just unreasonable.
As my final point I have to say that this rule is extremely arbitrary when it comes to 2D. The users are at the complete mercy of staff, when their favorite game gets thrown off the site they get understandably angry and take it up to the forums to talk about it and what happens? Mods often delete or edit comments as it's not the user's decision to make. It's cool that the mods help keep the site up and running but there is a very real reason why this rule in specific is polemic.
- Jun 12, 2017
- 745
- 1,290
I mean hey, if I was the one implementing the rules I would be much harsher. It's fucking weird, especially when you have younger siblings of your own. It's just the roulette you get to play if you have characters that look like kids and it's essentially the only reason I've ever seen threads get moved to trash (apart from some low quality ones). Hell at this point I've started to filter out what MC looks like because of how desensitized I am. Even then when you see a 9 year old banging some milf it takes me out for a bit.I don't want to buy a fight with you or an army of mods, especially since this thread isn't about discussions on Rule 7, however, I can't leave this unanswered. It will be my first and last reply.
This is a very curious thing to say indeed.
There is another character, "The Quarterling", which is also quite short, shorter than the noble in fact. Is The Quarterling depicting a prepubescent character? He is a fantasy character from another race so it gives license to say that his race stays the same size throughout their whole lives. If he claims to be an adult, does it make him one? The Quarterling doesn't state his age after all.
If the noble, a fictitious character, in a fantasy world, says he is an adult, does it make him one? If a vampire loli claims that she is a thousand years old, does it make her truly a thousand years old? It may sound a little stupid to discuss this and that's because it IS stupid to discuss this in the first place. You can't possibly know for sure outside of what the author tells you, they aren't real people after all. Are you really going to impose your judgement upon other's character?
Now, even IF the noble boy or other similar characters really are children, which I truly honestly doubt, there is the issue that the execution of the rule is still arbitrary, not consistent at all. The post you linked explains the reasons why the rules are in place and I agree with them, the thing though is that just below the post you linked Sam and Oiz are explaining why Vitamin Quest and Insexual Awakening aren't flagged by Rule 7. This is what's written in the thread you posted:
" Rule 7 is about REALISTIC depictions of PREPUBESCENT children. This is neither about drawn stuff, like Insexual Awakening, nor about young teens or anything. If we remove Rule 7 it will open up the forum to the posting of straight-up Child-Pornography and when that happens, this site won't be here for long. "
So let me get this straight, Insexual Awakening where the protagonist, his little sister, and his cousin are teenagers at best is ok because it's drawn porn and it's not realistic at all but somehow Adelaide Inn which is also drawn, is a game set in a fantasy world, with fantasy races, with characters that you can completely skip is somehow unacceptable? Right. Some 3D games here heavily violate this rule seeing as they are the closest to being realistic or semi-realistic, what about the game "Tessa"? "Parental Love"? "23 Sisters"? The game "But I'm the Bad Guy" clearly depicts the little girl, the daughter of the couple as being not only short but also having the behaviors of a child. But of course, all of those games can simply have the characters say that they are 18 anyway
I'm really sorry but the answer: "As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member" simply doesn't go well, it absolutely feels like the decision is coming from the whims of some staff member.
These are made up added offenses. First of all, you don't apply rules for developers themselves unless they did some really unforgivable, atrocious stuff. You apply rules for projects, a case-by-case judgement. Should a game be removed just because a dev previously included content in some OTHER project? No, it's not fair at all. I get it, maybe you don't like this type of content, maybe you have to give the diplomatic answer, that's ok. I'm not your typical Rule 7 complainer either, in fact I care more about NTRS, but that's just unreasonable.
As my final point I have to say that this rule is extremely arbitrary when it comes to 2D. The users are at the complete mercy of staff, when their favorite game gets thrown off the site they get understandably angry and take it up to the forums to talk about it and what happens? Mods often delete or edit comments as it's not the user's decision to make. It's cool that the mods help keep the site up and running but there is a very real reason why this rule in specific is polemic.
Unless F95 adds RULES RULES like, "no smaller than half of other characters", there is no way to really enforce it. The fact that there is no objective way to judge it is horrible. Even then devs would just circumvent them given that F95 is the driver of popularization of many NSFW games. When does it really stop, otherwise if you keep giving them benefit of doubt, infants?
I fail to see why you want to separate projects from the dev, as the past behaviour is a predictor of future behaviour. Dev shouldn't be punished for content he provided in previous game/s but it sure as hell should be taken as context if necessary IMO, as it helps establish what dev thinks of stuff
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
In the end, this is pirate website based on some African web servers and in the end it's up to staff discretion. What if the staff responsible actually like the dev/project? What if said staff is more lenient compared to others?
It's nothing to really consider for too long, as it's pretty clear that if they wanted to, they could let all stuff in. As long as you stay in Off topic I doubt you'll face any repercussions for discussing the games
- Jul 24, 2018
- 443
- 1,567
A new Suzuya game just got posted, it's Being kidnapped by aliens and becoming a hero on the night I lent my wife to my junior. If I remember correctly potatogod did a long summary about it, it may be worth checking out given the history of this developer.
- Aug 3, 2017
- 1,473
- 5,773
You are indeed remembering correctly. This is the post you're thinking of: https://f95zone.to/threads/90458/post-7571614.
For others, potatogod put a lot of thought and effort into it, and it is an interesting read (but expect heavy spoilers, and less than adequate use of paragraph breaks to parse the information to make things easier for readers, lol). Great post if memory serves. Read it if you're interested in that game and don't mind spoilers; otherwise, skip it.
Every translated Suzuya game brings us one step closer to enlightenment. It is a beautiful day to be alive.